Photo via Al Jazeera

Israel is killing the people who could end its wars

Read the original at Al Jazeera ↗
Cite

Zweiri, M. (2026, September 18). Israel is killing the people who could end its wars. Al Jazeera. https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2026/9/18/israel-is-killing-the-people-who-could-end-its-wars?traffic_source=rss

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Al Jazeera · collected 2026-09-18 · by Mahjoob Zweiri

Quick Summary

Sir John Sawers, a former head of Britain’s foreign intelligence service, recently claimed in The Financial Times that Israel deliberately killed Ali Larijani in March 2026. According to Sawers, Larijani was targeted not because of his role in Iran's war effort but due to his potential as a negotiator who could facilitate peace talks. This analysis suggests a pattern where Israel removes key diplomatic figures at critical moments when negotiations are possible, thereby undermining prospects for conflict resolution. The article draws parallels with historical instances such as the assassination of Count Folke Bernadotte in 1948 and Mohsen Fakhrizadeh in 2020, arguing that eliminating potential negotiators creates a vacuum filled by less flexible successors, thus reinforcing perceptions that diplomacy is futile.
Written by AI on 2026-09-18, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In early September 2026, Sir John Sawers, former head of Britain’s foreign intelligence service, told The Financial Times that Israel had deliberately killed Ali Larijani, not because he led Iran's war efforts but because he was one of the few Iranian figures capable of negotiating a deal both sides could accept. This raises questions about whether such targeted killings are part of a larger strategy to eliminate potential peace negotiators at critical moments. Diplomacy requires key interlocutors who have the authority and standing to negotiate; removing these individuals makes it nearly impossible for wars to end through diplomatic means, as seen with Larijani's assassination. This tactic might win battles but could prolong conflict indefinitely by eliminating the possibility of a settlement.

Written for “Palestinian Peace Activists At Risk” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Palestinian Peace Activists At Risk
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly left and hedges 9% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
BBC News
Hedges 3 of 24 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles describe different events; Article A focuses on the Israeli minister's threat to revoke citizenship of filmmakers for their Gaza documentary, while Article B discusses an assessment that Israel deliberately killed Ali Larijani.”
Al Jazeera
Hedges 4 of 19 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Article A discusses Israeli actions in clearing rubble in Gaza and criticism from the UN, while Article B focuses on a claim that Israel deliberately killed Ali Larijani as part of diplomatic figures being targeted.”
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 1 of 13 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different events: one about a deliberate killing of Ali Larijani as mentioned by Sir John Sawers, and another about an Israeli strike on a motorcycle in Gaza City that killed a Palestinian and injured others.”
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 0 of 9 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe two different events: one about the alleged targeted killing of Ali Larijani by Israel, and another about an Israeli military operation in Jenin resulting in a Palestinian fatality.”
The Free Press
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 0 of 6 claims Outlet record 96/100
“The articles discuss different topics and do not describe the same specific incident.”
The Dispatch
Hedges 0 of 4 claims Outlet record 61/100
“The articles discuss different topics and do not describe the same specific incident.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
47
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
9%
4 of 47 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
60/100
Al Jazeera's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-18 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Al Jazeera · 4815 article(s) · 3 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 3 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Mahjoob Zweiri
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 In his reading, Larijani was targeted not because he ran Iran’s war effort, but because he was among the few Iranian figures capable of reaching a deal both sides could accept.
2026-09-18 · assertive framing · Israel is killing the people who could end its wars
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Britain Iran Iranian Israel The Financial Times

Subjects

Israel GPE · 7× Iran GPE · 3× Larijani PERSON · 3× Ali Larijani PERSON · 1× Britain GPE · 1× Folke Bernadotte PERSON · 1× Iranian NORP · 1× John Sawers PERSON · 1× The Financial Times ORG · 1× United Nations GPE · 1×

Narrative

But if the figures capable of closing a deal are removed as fast as they emerge, and the centres through which adversaries govern and negotiate are hollowed out by design, one question becomes unavoidable: who is left to make peace with — and does a strategy that keeps winning on the battlefield by emptying the negotiating table eventually run out of anyone able to end the war at all?
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-18
🔮 In his reading, Larijani was targeted not because he ran Iran’s war effort, but because he was among the few Iranian figures capable of reaching a deal both sides could accept.
2026-09-18 · Al Jazeera
Israel is killing the people who could end its wars · assertive framing

Claims (47 extracted, 4 hedged)

In international politics, it is often assumed that wars end when the fighting becomes unbearable and the parties turn to diplomacy. asserted
parties → assume → diplomacy
But diplomacy requires interlocutors — figures with the standing to negotiate and the authority to deliver. asserted
diplomacy → require → standing
Remove them, and a war loses not only its potential mediators but the very possibility of a settlement. asserted
war → remove → settlement
This is worth keeping in mind after a striking recent assessment. asserted
This → keep → assessment
In early September 2026, Sir John Sawers, the former head of Britain’s foreign intelligence service, told The Financial Times that Israel had deliberately killed Ali Larijani. asserted
Israel → tell → Larijani
In his reading, Larijani was targeted not because he ran Iran’s war effort, but because he was among the few Iranian figures capable of reaching a deal both sides could accept. uncertain
sides → target → deal
Coming from a career intelligence officer rather than an advocate, the judgement invites a larger question: does the killing of Larijani belong to a pattern in which Israel removes, at moments of possible negotiation, the very people through whom a war might have been ended? uncertain
war → come → whom
A pattern, not an incident Consider what such killings actually produce. asserted
killings → consider → what
Assassinating the head of a government or an army opens a vacuum that others rush to fill. asserted
others → assassinate → that
Assassinating a designated negotiator opens a narrower and more damaging one: a vacuum of moderation. asserted
Assassinating → assassinate → moderation
The successor to a killed negotiator is rarely more flexible than the person removed. asserted
successor → kill → person
More often, he is harder, because the hardliners are the ones who survive and inherit. asserted
who → survive → ?
The channel loses its author, and the hardening that follows is then read, on both sides, as proof that diplomacy was never possible in the first place. asserted
diplomacy → lose → place
The tactic becomes self-fulfilling: it does not merely interrupt a negotiation; it manufactures the evidence that negotiation was futile. asserted
negotiation → become → evidence
In September 1948, Count Folke Bernadotte, the United Nations mediator for Palestine, was assassinated in Jerusalem by members of Lehi, the Zionist underground whose leaders included the future Israeli prime minister, Yitzhak Shamir. asserted
leaders → assassinate → minister
Bernadotte had been shuttling between the parties with truce and partition proposals. asserted
Bernadotte → shuttle → proposals
His killers regarded any compromise as betrayal. asserted
killers → regard → betrayal
The same logic reappeared in November 2020, when Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, the leading figure in Iran’s nuclear programme, was killed near Tehran in an operation widely attributed to Israel. asserted
Fakhrizadeh → reappear → Israel
The timing — weeks after Joe Biden was elected president of the United States, having committed to reviving the 2015 nuclear agreement — led many to read it less as counterproliferation than as an obstacle deliberately placed in the path of diplomacy. asserted
Biden → elect → diplomacy
Larijani’s killing in March 2026 fits the same template. asserted
killing → fit → template
He had been Iran’s nuclear negotiator two decades earlier and had defended the 2015 deal as speaker of parliament. asserted
He → defend → parliament
After the assassination of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei on the war’s opening day, he had become the country’s effective decision-maker. asserted
he → become → day
Western diplomats who dealt with him described him as tough but pragmatic — precisely the kind of counterpart with whom an American off-ramp might have been negotiated. uncertain
ramp → deal → whom
This is not a method confined to states. asserted
This → confine → states
Israel applies the same logic to the non-state actors it fights, and the results reveal both the strategy and its ambiguities. asserted
results → apply → strategy
In February 1992, Israel killed Hezbollah’s secretary-general, Abbas al-Musawi. asserted
Israel → kill → general
His successor was Hassan Nasrallah, who, over three decades, built the movement into the most capable non-state armed force in the region — a vacuum filled by a far harder man. asserted
who → build → man
In July 2024, Israel assassinated Ismail Haniyeh, the head of Hamas’s political bureau and its lead negotiator in the Gaza ceasefire talks, while that diplomacy was still under way; authority passed to Yahya Sinwar, and the negotiating track never recovered. asserted
track → assassinate → Sinwar
Weeks later, Israel killed Nasrallah himself. asserted
Israel → kill → Nasrallah
In each case, the target was the point of coordination — the figure through whom the adversary organised and, at times, negotiated. asserted
adversary → organise → times
Removing him produced the same short-term disarray and, at least twice, a successor even less inclined to a deal. asserted
Removing → remove → deal
Seen through Israel’s own strategic lens, this is coherent rather than merely vindictive. asserted
this → see → lens
For a state that regards Iran’s system as an existential threat, the preferred outcome is that system’s collapse, not a negotiated accommodation with it. asserted
outcome → regard → it
A durable deal brokered by a credible pragmatist would stabilise the very order Israel wants to see fall, and it would foreclose the American military pressure on which the hope of collapse depends. asserted
hope → broker → collapse
External pressure has tended to harden the very indecision it claims to break, widening the split between a political leadership that acknowledges the war’s costs and a security establishment that treats every strike as vindication of defiance. uncertain
that → tend → defiance
Removing the pragmatists tilts that balance further towards the second camp — and towards the conclusion that there is nothing left to negotiate. asserted
Removing → remove → conclusion
Israel’s stated rationale, in each case, has been military and preventive: the decapitation of a hostile leadership. asserted
rationale → state → leadership
Larijani was no dove — he helped run a war effort and presided over harsh repression at home. asserted
he → help → home
Haniyeh led a movement responsible for the October 2023 attack. asserted
Haniyeh → lead → attack
The intent to foreclose diplomacy is inferred, not proven, and the returns are uncertain: as the al-Musawi killing showed, removing a leader can produce a stronger and more implacable successor rather than a pliable one. asserted
removing → foreclose → one
…and 7 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support