Photo via New York Post

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle warned to be ‘discreet’ as security risk to royal family is ‘severe’

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Bitsky, L. (2026, September 18). Prince Harry and Meghan Markle warned to be ‘discreet’ as security risk to royal family is ‘severe’. New York Post. https://pagesix.com/2026/09/18/royal-family/prince-harry-and-meghan-markle-warned-to-be-discreet-as-security-risk-to-royal-family-is-severe/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-09-18 · by Leah Bitsky

Quick Summary

Simon Morgan, a former Met Police bodyguard for the British royal family, has warned Prince Harry and Meghan Markle to be discreet upon their return to the UK due to severe security risks facing the royal family. Morgan cites both actual threats related to Harry’s past military service and perceived risks stemming from public sentiment towards the Sussexes since they left royal duties in 2020. He emphasizes the need for an adaptable security plan given the evolving nature of potential dangers, noting that a failure to adjust such plans could lead to increased vulnerabilities, like compromising personal information.
Written by AI on 2026-09-18, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

A former British Met Police bodyguard, Simon Morgan, has warned Prince Harry and Meghan Markle to be discreet upon their return to the UK in August 2023. Morgan founded special security team Trojan Consultancy and noted that since the Sussexes quit royal duties and moved to California in 2020, they have become polarizing figures. He emphasized the current severe threat level to the UK and its assets, including the Royal Family. The specific concern for Harry stems from his status as a prince and former military officer who served two tours of duty, particularly given his public discussion about killing Taliban fighters in his memoir, potentially exposing him to "genuine security threats." Additionally, Morgan highlighted that being a high-profile figure with significant wealth creates perceived risks to their family's safety and financial stability.

Written for “Royal Family Security Concerns” on 2026-11-04, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Royal Family Security Concerns
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 10% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Daily Mail
Hedges 9 of 59 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Prince Harry and Meghan's situation in Britain, with one focusing on their social media presence and brand relaunch, while the other addresses security concerns.”
Evening Standard
Hedges 2 of 12 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the Sussexes' situation regarding their security and schooling, not the same specific incident.”
Daily Mail
Hedges 11 of 66 claims Outlet record 69/100
“Article A discusses a specific security incident involving Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet's school route, while Article B is about general advice given to Harry and Meghan regarding security concerns.”
Evening Standard
Hedges 4 of 21 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the Sussexes' situation and do not describe the same specific incident.”
New York Post
Hedges 6 of 27 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of security related to Prince Harry and Meghan Markle but describe distinct incidents.”
Fox News
Hedges 1 of 6 claims Outlet record 68/100
“Article A discusses security concerns for Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, while Article B focuses on a 'line in the sand' drawn by King Charles regarding the couple's actions.”
The Sydney Morning Herald
Hedges 3 of 20 claims Outlet record 61/100
“The articles discuss different perspectives on security concerns for Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, but they are not reporting on the same specific incident.”
BBC News
Hedges 0 of 5 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss related security concerns but describe different aspects: Article A is about a review of Harry and Meghan's security, while Article B focuses on advice from a former royal security staffer.”
Fox News
Hedges 3 of 48 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of guidance and warnings related to Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's return to the UK, but they describe distinct events with different sources and focuses.”
BBC News
Hedges 1 of 17 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles cover related but different aspects of the Sussexes' security situation upon their return to the UK, rather than a single specific incident.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
29
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
10%
3 of 29 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-18 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 16741 article(s) · 36 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 36 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Leah Bitsky
39 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have been pushing RAVEC — the UK committee responsible for royal security arrangements — to grant them armed police protection while living in Britain, but a source exclusively told Page Six that their security would only be upgraded if a credible threat to their family emerged.
🔮 “Jack could be very particular about how he liked things,” a source shared with us.
🔮 “And they were able to time it so that they could do it right then.”
🔮 “She was at home and would spend the mornings reading the New York Times, listening to [WQXR Radio], talking to us as though she were herself,” Jane said while getting choked up.
🔮 “I wouldn’t describe Meghan as having fled the UK following the allegations against her father,” royal journalist Andrea Caamano exclusively told Page Six.
🔮 The royal family is expected to wash their hands of any drama surrounding Meghan Markle’s father, Thomas Markle Sr., after he was accused of possessing a collection of child pornography, according to multiple royal insiders.
🔮 “This may give King Charles III the ammunition to take a firmer stance in distancing the monarchy from Harry and Meghan,” royal commentator Kinsey Schofield exclusively told Page Six.
🔮 She added, “When you love someone who is struggling, you want so desperately to find the right words, the right solution, the one thing that might make everything better.”
🔮 “Will William respond?
🔮 Last week, a judge ruled that Maceo would be testifying in court.
Also by Leah Bitsky
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 39 articles by Leah Bitsky →

Topics

British Met Police Page Six Taliban the Royal Family

Subjects

Morgan PERSON · 10× Harry PERSON · 7× Sussexes NORP · 3× Markle PERSON · 2× Page Six ORG · 2× British NORP · 1× Meghan Markle PERSON · 1× Met Police ORG · 1× Prince Harry PERSON · 1× the Royal Family ORG · 1×

Narrative

Morgan, who founded special security team Trojan Consultancy, factored in how the Duke and Duchess of Sussex became polarizing people after they quit their royal duties and moved to California in 2020 — only to return to the UK six years later in August.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-18
🔮 “[Harry] publicly discussed killing Taliban fighters in his memoir,” Morgan noted, saying that the royal vet could expose himself to “genuine security threats.”

Claims (29 extracted, 3 hedged)

A former royal security staffer is urging Prince Harry and Meghan Markle to proceed with caution amid a perceived threat to the royal family following the Sussexes’ return to the UK. asserted
staffer → urge → UK
“The threat to the UK and its assets, of which the Royal Family is one, is currently severe,” former Met Police bodyguard to the British royal family, Simon Morgan, exclusively told Page Six Thursday. asserted
bodyguard → tell → family
“Being discreet and unobtrusive is really important — you don’t want to unsettle the environment, as that causes problems,” he said. asserted
he → want → problems
Morgan further assessed that Harry’s recent security concerns stem from both concrete threats and his understanding of the risks associated with his royal ties. asserted
concerns → assess → ties
Describing them as “actual risks,” Morgan pointed to Harry’s status as a prince, as well as a former military officer who served two operational tours. asserted
who → describe → tours
“[Harry] publicly discussed killing Taliban fighters in his memoir,” Morgan noted, saying that the royal vet could expose himself to “genuine security threats.” uncertain
vet → discuss → threats
At the same time, being a public figure with a high net worth inherently creates “perceived risks” to Harry’s family, finances and social standing, Morgan continued. asserted
Morgan → create → family
“Therefore, they seek to reduce and mitigate the risks by using security [and] professionals whose job it is to deal with these threats,” he said. asserted
he → seek → threats
Morgan, who founded special security team Trojan Consultancy, factored in how the Duke and Duchess of Sussex became polarizing people after they quit their royal duties and moved to California in 2020 — only to return to the UK six years later in August. asserted
they → found → August
“If we look at the Sussexes’ visibility over recent years, they have alienated large sections of the public [and] everyone has an opinion,” he said. asserted
he → look → opinion
“Most are negative, some positive and some don’t care.” asserted
some → care → ?
But negative public sentiment does not necessarily translate into a credible threat of physical harm, Morgan explained, adding that determining whether that hostility poses an actual danger is a matter of intelligence. asserted
hostility → translate → intelligence
Having worked in royal protection as well as the private sector, Morgan knows that the Sussxes’ security team most likely created an “operational plan.” asserted
team → work → plan
Morgan said the most effective security team would be one that “can adapt when things change.” asserted
things → say → ?
“That plan needs to be evaluated and it needs to evolve according to changes, intelligence, environmental, media, principals, global events. uncertain
it → need → changes
You can’t just create a plan and stick with it no matter what,” he said. asserted
he → create → it
“Ultimately, the Sussexes’ team has done that by changing schools. asserted
team → do → schools
It wasn’t working, the risks were too great, they couldn’t be mitigated, so a change was needed,” he said. asserted
he → work → ?
“Given who the Duchess is, her personal number should not have been given out, as that is now compromised and could lead to all sorts of problems based on intelligence leakage around that number,” Morgan said. uncertain
Morgan → give → number
“A third-party option should have been considered.” asserted
option → consider → ?
As for whether Harry and Markle will be able to maintain a private life despite being public figures, Morgan said “it is possible.” “Many people do it, but there are risks associated with A-listers … asserted
people → maintain → listers
And you have to identify the risks and create a security plan accordingly,” he urged. asserted
he → have → plan
“That ultimately takes time and money in reality.” asserted
That → take → reality
“The higher the profile, the more factors to consider, the more resources that are needed and ultimately the greater financial resources and commitment that is needed,” he said. asserted
he → consider → ?
His father, King Charles III, made it clear that his son and daughter-in-law would remain private citizens upon their return, reminding the public that they abandoned their working royal roles in 2020. asserted
they → make → 2020
On Thursday, Harry made his first official appearance after relocating to the UK, attending the Invictus Spirit Gala Dinner & Awards at the Old Royal Naval College in Greenwich, London. asserted
Harry → make → Greenwich
Page Six reached out to reps for Harry and Markle. asserted
Page → reach → Harry
Conversation Your voice matters. asserted
voice → matter → Conversation
Discussions are moderated for civility. asserted
Discussions → moderate → civility
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support