Photo via The Guardian

What Trump’s attacks on mail-in voting mean for the midterms

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Cite

Zornick, G. (2026, September 18). What Trump’s attacks on mail-in voting mean for the midterms. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/sep/17/trump-mail-voting-explained-stakes-newsletter

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Guardian · collected 2026-09-18 · by George Zornick

Quick Summary

Donald Trump’s March executive order aimed to restrict mail-in voting by instructing the US Postal Service to deny delivery to ballots from individuals deemed ineligible by federal authorities. This move was met with legal and logistical challenges, including criticism from state election officials and a whistleblower complaint detailing implementation issues. On Monday night, the Supreme Court rejected Trump's plan, leading him to lash out on Truth Social against conservative justices who did not side entirely with him. Trump’s response highlights his ongoing efforts to undermine faith in voting systems and asserts that federal entities should follow his directives rather than constitutional law or established norms.
Written by AI on 2026-09-18, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Postmaster General David Steiner announced that the U.S. Postal Service has halted work on a controversial computer system developed under President Donald Trump's executive order, aimed at limiting voting by mail. This decision follows Supreme Court rulings striking down the executive order and issuing injunctions against implementing it. The suspension was confirmed in an interview with The Associated Press, where Steiner, who previously worked as CEO of Waste Management, emphasized his agency’s role as independent from political directives despite navigating financial hardships and political turbulence caused by Trump's policies. Unlike Trump, who criticized the court decisions, Steiner avoided commenting on the rulings' merits or implications for voter eligibility ahead of critical midterm elections in November.

Written for “Trump Mail Voting Restrictions” on 2026-11-05, grounded in this article and the 46 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Trump Mail Voting Restrictions
Politics · 47 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 6% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Mother Jones
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 9 of 73 claims Outlet record 60/100
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 7 of 43 claims Outlet record 66/100
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 6 of 36 claims Outlet record 60/100
The Guardian
Hedges 4 of 39 claims Outlet record 66/100
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 7 of 33 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of voting issues under President Trump's administration, but do not describe the same specific incident.”
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 4 of 16 claims Outlet record 60/100
The Independent
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 8 of 32 claims Outlet record 59/100
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this Hedges 3 of 26 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of voting and elections without focusing on the same specific incident.”
Washington Examiner
Hedges 0 of 21 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss different actions: one about Trump's executive order on mail-in voting and its legal challenges, while the other is about California's governor signing bills in response to perceived threats to election integrity.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 4 of 23 claims Outlet record 66/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
36
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
6%
2 of 36 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
The Guardian's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
47
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-18 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Guardian · 2073 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

George Zornick
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 For the millions of Americans who vote by mail – almost a third of the country – the week began with significant uncertainty that they would be able to easily submit their ballot this fall, thanks to a March executive order from Donald Trump that aimed to restrict mail-in ballots.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Americans North Carolina The Department of Homeland Security the Social Security Administration the US Postal Service

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 11× GOP ORG · 2× Guardian ORG · 2× North Carolina GPE · 2× Americans NORP · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× Sam Levine PERSON · 1× The Department of Homeland Security ORG · 1× the Social Security Administration ORG · 1× the US Postal Service ORG · 1×

Narrative

Don’t take our word for it: only hours before Trump’s arrival in Gastonia, North Carolina, the White House blasted out a press release correctly noting: “In North Carolina, crime fell across all four major categories in the first half of this year compared with the same period last year, including a 12.4% drop in murders, an 18% drop in robberies and a 23% drop in motor vehicle thefts.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-18
🔮 For the millions of Americans who vote by mail – almost a third of the country – the week began with significant uncertainty that they would be able to easily submit their ballot this fall, thanks to a March executive order from Donald Trump that aimed to restrict mail-in ballots.
2026-09-18 · The Guardian
What Trump’s attacks on mail-in voting mean for the midterms · assertive framing

Claims (36 extracted, 2 hedged)

For the millions of Americans who vote by mail – almost a third of the country – the week began with significant uncertainty that they would be able to easily submit their ballot this fall, thanks to a March executive order from Donald Trump that aimed to restrict mail-in ballots. asserted
that → vote → ballots
By Monday night, the supreme court restored a measure of order by rebuking the president and rejecting his plan – but Trump’s frothing response portends more danger for the rapidly approaching midterms. asserted
response → restore → midterms
Trump’s March order forbade the US Postal Service from delivering mailed ballots to anyone the administration deemed ineligible. asserted
administration → forbid → anyone
The Department of Homeland Security, working with the Social Security Administration, would have devised that list of supposedly ineligible, noncitizen voters. asserted
Department → work → voters
On its face, the move appeared plainly illegal. asserted
move → appear → face
One expert told the Guardian’s Sam Levine, “This is a wholly unconstitutional EO,” because ultimately the federal government cannot set election rules; only states can. asserted
states → tell → rules
A whistleblower told Congress earlier this month that the Postal Service simply didn’t have the ability to implement the system safely, and that the whole plan was “perilously rushed and potentially unlawful”, according to Richard Blumenthal, the senator who handled the whistleblower complaint. uncertain
who → tell → complaint
State election officials also complained they would be unable to implement Trump’s restrictions this close to an election, even if they were deemed lawful. asserted
they → complain → election
Alabama, North Carolina and Wisconsin had already begun mailing out ballots before the supreme court ruled, and chaos would have reigned there and across the country had the court blessed Trump’s plan. But it didn’t – and that sent Trump into a furor. asserted
that → begin → furor
In a lengthy post on Truth Social, in which he called mailed ballots “corrupt and out of control”, he singled out the conservative justices who had gone against him on that issue and this year’s ruling on tariffs. asserted
who → call → tariffs
(Only the justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissented from the mailed ballot ruling; Amy Coney Barrett and Neil Gorsuch, both nominated by Trump, did not.) asserted
Barrett → dissent → Trump
“These are not the people I interviewed to serve on the United States Supreme Court, they are merely a shell of their original selves,” the president fulminated. asserted
president → interview → selves
His position is clear: the federal courts, the states that administer elections, the USPS – all of them should bow to his whims, regardless of what the constitution says. asserted
constitution → administer → what
Trump has already shattered legal norms by appointing his former personal lawyer to head the Department of Justice and then continuing to treat him as a personal attorney. asserted
Trump → shatter → attorney
Just this week, in a remarkable scene at the White House, the US attorney general, Todd Blanche, served the role of White House press secretary, answering a wide range of questions from reporters on behalf of the president. asserted
general → serve → president
A day later, a smiling Blanche attended a Trump rally for the GOP Senate candidate Michael Whatley in North Carolina, flashing an enthusiastic thumbs-up from the crowd. asserted
Blanche → smile → crowd
The extraordinary danger of this moment is that a president who believes he is the law, and the law is him, remains intent on disrupting the electoral process. asserted
law → believe → process
Trump’s claims about mail-in voting are false, as the Guardian’s George Chidi explained. uncertain
Chidi → mail → voting
The Brookings Institution has found: “An average total mail voting fraud percentage across the 2016, 2018, 2020, and 2022 general elections of only 0.000043%, or about four cases of mail voting fraud out of every 10 million mail votes.” asserted
Institution → find → votes
But Trump has been obsessed with the issue since 2020, when mailed ballots – which are typically counted last – evaporated his slim lead in some key states on election night. asserted
which → obsess → night
(Incidentally, Trump has voted by mail at least three times since then.) asserted
Trump → vote → mail
And more Democrats than Republicans vote by mail, so restricting mailed ballots also tilts the playing field towards the GOP. asserted
restricting → vote → GOP
State election officials are now working to assure voters that they can safely vote by mail this year, as Levine reported this week. asserted
Levine → work → mail
But one can safely assume Trump will not stop pushing democracy to the brink. asserted
Trump → assume → brink
Watch this race: Florida’s 27th congressional district Trump won this Miami district by 15 points in 2024, when he aggressively promised a campaign of “mass deportations”. asserted
he → watch → deportations
María Elvira Salazar, a Republican representative, easily held the seat, vanquishing her Democratic opponent by 20 points. asserted
Salazar → hold → points
But Salazar is distancing herself from Trump this time around. asserted
Salazar → distance → Trump
“Mr President, some of your immigration enforcement efforts have gone too far,” she says to the camera in a remarkable ad released on Thursday. asserted
she → go → Thursday
“In July, 50% of the 50,000 people that were detained had no criminal record. asserted
that → detain → record
Be careful what your advisers are telling you about immigration policy.” asserted
advisers → tell → policy
She is facing a significant challenge this year from Eliott Rodriguez, a Democrat and former news anchor. asserted
She → face → Rodriguez
During Trump’s speech address at a rally in North Carolina on Wednesday, which the Charlotte Observer described in an op-ed as a “dark, divisive” speech, he painted the Tar Heel state as a crime-ridden hellhole. asserted
he → describe → hellhole
“So nobody used to think of North Carolina as a dangerous state, criminally dangerous,” Trump said. asserted
Trump → use → state
And now it’s one of the most violent and one of the worst in the whole nation.” asserted
it → ’ → nation
But crime has fallen dramatically in North Carolina. asserted
crime → fall → Carolina
Don’t take our word for it: only hours before Trump’s arrival in Gastonia, North Carolina, the White House blasted out a press release correctly noting: “In North Carolina, crime fell across all four major categories in the first half of this year compared with the same period last year, including a 12.4% drop in murders, an 18% drop in robberies and a 23% drop in motor vehicle thefts. asserted
crime → take → thefts
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support