Photo via Washington Examiner

Noncitizen voters have lost on the facts. Now they’re weaponizing the Constitution

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Rogers, J. (2026, September 18). Noncitizen voters have lost on the facts. Now they’re weaponizing the Constitution. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/op-eds/4731974/noncitizen-voting-federal-law-states-rights/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-09-18 · by Jay Rogers

Quick Summary

A federal judge in Miami is set to hear arguments from noncitizen voters facing charges under 18 U.S.C. Section 611, which criminalizes voting by noncitizens in elections involving federal offices. The defendants argue that enforcing citizenship requirements for voting is a state responsibility, not a federal one, based on the Constitution’s provisions regarding elector qualifications. However, the Justice Department counters that Congress has constitutional authority under the Elections Clause to regulate federal elections and has previously criminalized similar offenses. This legal battle highlights the tension between state and federal powers in election regulation.
Written by AI on 2026-09-18, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

A federal judge in Miami will hear oral arguments this week regarding five individuals accused of noncitizen voting, who argue that 18 U.S.C. Section 611, which criminalizes such actions, is unconstitutional because Congress lacked authority to enact it; instead, they claim only states can regulate voter qualifications. This statute was part of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act passed in 1996. Those convicted under this law face penalties including fines up to $100,000 or imprisonment for up to a year. Previously, enforcement was lax with some defendants receiving minimal fines such as $150; however, the Trump administration toughened enforcement by linking prosecutions to deportation proceedings. The case highlights tensions between federal and state powers over election laws.

Written for “Noncitizen Voting” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Noncitizen Voting
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 2% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Mother Jones
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 9 of 73 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different legal actions related to voting: one is about the Supreme Court blocking Trump's mail ballot scheme, while the other is about a federal judge hearing oral arguments on noncitizen voting charges.”
Fox News
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 10 of 33 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of voter fraud cases; Article A covers federal election-related cases and prosecutions, while Article B focuses on legal arguments in court regarding the constitutionality of voting statutes.”
Toronto Star
Hedges 6 of 30 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of noncitizen voting cases, with Article A focusing on a legal argument in federal court and Article B reporting on arrest statistics from an administration's initiative.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 7 of 33 claims Outlet record 66/100
“While both articles discuss the legal challenge against the statute used to prosecute noncitizens for voting, they refer to different points in time and stages of the legal process.”
Fox News
Hedges 4 of 21 claims Outlet record 69/100
“Article A discusses a legal argument being made in Miami about noncitizen voting, while Article B reports on charges filed by the DOJ against 16 people across multiple states for election crimes.”
The Independent
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 7 of 31 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles refer to legal proceedings involving multiple individuals across different locations but do not specify they are covering the exact same court hearing or arguments at the same time.”
New York Post
Hedges 4 of 20 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses a federal judge hearing oral arguments on the constitutionality of noncitizen voting charges, while Article B reports the Justice Department charging multiple individuals across several states with election and voter-related crimes, including noncitizens. The events are related but distinct.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 3 of 35 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the issue surrounding noncitizen voting, with Article A focusing on a specific legal hearing in Miami and Article B criticizing the DOJ's Civil Division for actions related to verifying voter eligibility.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
41
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
2%
1 of 41 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
70/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-18 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 3970 article(s) · 7 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 7 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Jay Rogers
22 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 I wasn’t in that control room, and Diawara may have a perfectly good explanation.
🔮 Hollywood would call it a heist hoax film.
2026-10-30 · assertive framing · Fake robberies, real bills
🔮 This week, the justices lifted a court-ordered deadline that would have forced the agency to rule on a Democratic challenge to its political advertising policy before Nov. 3.
2026-10-18 · assertive framing · One ad, one price. Congress should say so
🔮 The 6-3 order is temporary, and the justices will hear arguments on Dec. 9.
🔮 If you entered illegally, a judge ordered you out, and your homeland won’t take you, America can send you somewhere that will.
🔮 Whatever you do, never submit to the extended, adversarial questioning that might reveal what millions of Americans were forced to confront after the June 2024 debate: that the 46th president’s cognitive capacity had been degrading in the most powerful office on Earth.
🔮 That timing placed the release squarely inside the window the DOJ’s own election-sensitivity guidance identifies as the highest-risk period for any government action that could appear to influence a vote.
🔮 Texas redistricting cost him his primary in May, so this was his last lap.
🔮 In Montgomery County, Maryland, school officials swapped a test-based magnet admissions process for one weighing an applicant’s home and neighborhood, after being briefed in advance on exactly how the switch would change the racial makeup of the incoming class.
🔮 A federal judge in Miami will hear oral arguments this week on a legal theory that five people around the country are betting will spring them from noncitizen voting charges.
Also by Jay Rogers
Fake robberies, real bills
2026-10-30 · Washington Examiner
The executive branch needs an executive
2026-10-23 · Washington Examiner
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 22 articles by Jay Rogers →

Topics

18 U.S.C. Section 611 Congress Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act Miami Reuters

Subjects

Congress ORG · 7× Miami ORG · 2× Christian Erazo Valdez PERSON · 1× Ecuadorian NORP · 1× House ORG · 1× Madison GPE · 1× Reuters ORG · 1× Senate ORG · 1× Trump PERSON · 1× Wisconsin GPE · 1×

Narrative

The Constitution ties House elector qualifications to state legislative qualifications under Article I, the 17th Amendment does the same for Senate races, and Article II leaves presidential elector selection to state legislatures.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-18
🔮 A federal judge in Miami will hear oral arguments this week on a legal theory that five people around the country are betting will spring them from noncitizen voting charges.
2026-09-18 · Washington Examiner
Noncitizen voters have lost on the facts. Now they’re weaponizing the Constitution · assertive framing

Claims (41 extracted, 1 hedged)

A federal judge in Miami will hear oral arguments this week on a legal theory that five people around the country are betting will spring them from noncitizen voting charges. asserted
people → hear → charges
Their pitch: The statute that made their vote a federal crime is unconstitutional. asserted
vote → make → ?
Congress, they argue, never had the authority to touch this. asserted
they → argue → this
Only the states do. asserted
states → do → ?
In my courtroom experience, when a defendant stops arguing the facts and starts arguing jurisdiction, it’s usually because the facts are a lost cause. asserted
facts → stop → jurisdiction
That’s what’s happening here, and the public deserves to understand exactly what’s at stake before a handful of judges decide it quietly. asserted
handful → ’ → it
The law in question, 18 U.S.C. Section 611, came out of the 1996 Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act. asserted
law → come → Act
It makes it a federal crime for a noncitizen to vote in an election that includes a federal office. asserted
that → make → office
Get caught, and you’re looking at a fine of up to $100,000, a year in prison, or both. asserted
you → catch → prison
For years, enforcement was so lax that Reuters reports some defendants faced fines as low as $150. asserted
defendants → report → 150
The Trump administration changed that, pairing prosecution with deportation proceedings, and now the people caught in the net are fighting back with a states’ rights argument dressed up as principle. asserted
people → change → principle
Here’s their case. asserted
case → ’ → ?
The Constitution ties House elector qualifications to state legislative qualifications under Article I, the 17th Amendment does the same for Senate races, and Article II leaves presidential elector selection to state legislatures. asserted
Article → tie → legislatures
Every state already requires citizenship to vote. asserted
state → require → citizenship
So, the defendants argue, enforcing that requirement is a state job, not a federal one. asserted
enforcing → argue → requirement
Christian Erazo Valdez, an Ecuadorian national charged in Madison, Wisconsin, for voting in the 2024 presidential race, was the first to make the argument in March. asserted
Valdez → charge → March
Chelsea Cox, a Jamaican national facing similar charges in Miami over a 2020 ballot, is now testing it before U.S. District Judge David Leibowitz. asserted
Cox → face → Leibowitz
The Justice Department’s answer is straightforward, and it’s the one that should carry the day. asserted
that → ’ → day
The Elections Clause gives Congress power to make or alter the rules governing federal elections, a power it has used before, including criminalizing repeat voting in the same race. asserted
it → give → race
Section 611 also sits inside an immigration statute, an area where Congress has broad, well-established authority. asserted
Congress → sit → authority
The DOJ compares it to the ban on foreign nationals making campaign contributions, a restriction courts have upheld without much fuss. asserted
courts → compare → fuss
Rob a federally insured bank and tell the judge that only your state’s attorney general has jurisdiction because banks operate branches locally. asserted
banks → rob → branches
No court would buy it, because federal interests and state administration can coexist without one canceling the other. asserted
one → buy → other
Elections work the same way. asserted
Elections → work → way
States run the polling places and print the ballots. asserted
States → run → ballots
Congress protects the federal offices that those ballots decide. asserted
ballots → protect → that
That’s not a contradiction. asserted
That → ’ → ?
It’s the design the founders wrote down. asserted
founders → ’ → ?
The defendants aren’t inventing their theory from nothing. asserted
defendants → invent → nothing
States do hold the primary role in setting voter qualifications, and Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia spent a career reminding courts that enumerated powers mean what they say and nothing more. asserted
they → hold → what
But even under a strict originalist reading, the elections clause and the naturalization power both give Congress a legitimate hook here. asserted
clause → give → hook
Congress passed this law in 1996, long before anyone in this dispute had heard of the current administration. asserted
anyone → pass → administration
A win for the defendants wouldn’t legalize noncitizen voting. asserted
win → legalize → voting
It would just hand enforcement back to state prosecutors, some of whom have neither the appetite nor the budget to chase these cases. asserted
some → hand → cases
With rulings possibly landing before the Nov. 3 midterm elections, the timing raises the stakes for public confidence in an election system that’s already taking enough hits. uncertain
that → land → hits
Congress should close the door on this argument before a sympathetic judge opens it wider. asserted
judge → close → it
The right to vote in elections belongs to citizens. asserted
right → vote → citizens
That’s not radical. asserted
That → ’ → ?
It’s the whole point of citizenship, and no clever motion to dismiss should be allowed to make it optional. asserted
it → ’ → citizenship
He has a bachelor’s degree in criminal justice from Northeastern University and has completed postgraduate studies at the University of California, Los Angeles; the University of Pennsylvania; and Harvard University. asserted
He → have → Pennsylvania
…and 1 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support