Selling Alcohol Isn't a Political Function

Read the original at Reason ↗
Cite

Volokh, E. (2026, September 18). Selling Alcohol Isn't a Political Function. Reason. https://reason.com/volokh/2026/09/18/selling-alcohol-isnt-a-political-function/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Reason · collected 2026-09-18 · by Eugene Volokh

Quick Summary

The Oklahoma Attorney General issued an opinion on September 8 stating that a statute requiring applicants for alcohol sales licenses to be U.S. citizens violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The opinion argues that selling alcohol does not constitute a "political function" reserved exclusively for citizens and thus the citizenship requirement is unenforceable against lawfully present non-citizens.
Written by AI on 2026-09-18, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On September 8, the Oklahoma Attorney General issued Opinion 2026-13, concluding that requiring U.S. citizenship for liquor licensing violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The opinion states that discrimination against lawfully present aliens is subject to strict scrutiny, a high legal standard where states must demonstrate that such requirements are narrowly tailored to serve a compelling state interest. The AG determined that Oklahoma failed to meet this rigorous test and thus concluded that the citizenship requirement for liquor licenses is unenforceable. This decision underscores the limited scope of exceptions to equal protection principles, particularly when it comes to nonpolitical functions like selling alcohol.

Written for “Alcohol Sales Not Political” on 2026-11-04, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Alcohol Sales Not Political
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
19
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
11%
2 of 19 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
67/100
Reason's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-18 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Reason · 1127 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Eugene Volokh
192 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 In May 2025, Harvard revoked Plaintiff's tenure and terminated her appointment with HBS.
🔮 The requirement would hold DSPs liable for their failure to adhere to state-set publication standards, not only "treat[ing] [them] as … publisher[s] or speaker[s]," but treating them as publishers subject to sweeping state controls.
🔮 From Sanchez v. Almond, decided Wednesday by Judge John McConnell (D.R.I.): Mr. Sanchez began working at the office of Rhode Island Governor Daniel J. McKee in May 2021 as a "constituent services" staffer.
🔮 Beauchamp believed that the post appeared to condone murder based on the victim's political viewpoints and statements and became concerned that this post and perception would reflect on GCAO in the public's eyes and thereby undermine the public's trust in GCAO's official duty to prosecute homicides without bias and without regard to a victim's views, statements, or affiliations.
2026-11-02 · assertive framing · Firing for "Rot in Hell Charlie Kirk" Post Upheld
🔮 After Judge Covington announced that she would be denying McClain's suppression motion, Outlaw stood up and said "the judge is a cocksucker" loud enough for Judge Covington to hear.
🔮 According to the Complaint, in August 2024, Plaintiffs and other District community members learned that then-member of the Board of School Directors of Souderton Area School District (the "Board") William Formica posted lewd comments on social media about Vice President Kamala Harris, disparaging teachers and non-English speakers, and deriding diversity programs.
🔮 Some excerpts from the long First Superseding Indictment in U.S. v. Hakim (E.D. Mich.), filed Oct. 21, alleging conspiracy to transmit threats in interstate commerce as well as, for two defendants, witness intimidation and destruction of property to prevent seizure (8 of the 12 defendants had originally been indicted in May); the targets included UM officials and businesses connected with them, as well as the Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Detroit:
🔮 Because "[t]he costs and efforts required to defend a lawsuit through [discovery] could chill free speech nearly as effectively as the absence of the actual malice standard altogether[,]" a public figure plaintiff must plausibly allege actual malice at the outset of the litigation.
🔮 The First Amendment forbids a State from using its investigative power that way, and I will not allow it while this case is pending.
🔮 The same logic could apply to nuns who had felt religious pressure to do the educational or nursing work that their order was known for, or to monks who had felt religious pressure to do agricultural work that supports the monastery.
2026-10-30 · assertive framing · Amicus Brief in OneTaste Criminal Prosecution
Also by Eugene Volokh
Open Thread
2026-11-03 · Reason
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 192 articles by Eugene Volokh →

Topics

State the Equal Protection Clause the Fourteenth Amendment the United States the United States Constitution

Subjects

State ORG · 3× Bernal PERSON · 2× the United States GPE · 2× Court ORG · 1× Fainter PERSON · 1× Graham PERSON · 1× Oklahoma GPE · 1× Richardson PERSON · 1× The U.S. Supreme Court ORG · 1× The Volokh PERSON · 1×

Narrative

This office has received your request for an Attorney General Opinion in which you ask the following question: Does the requirement in title 37A, section 2-146(A)(1) that an applicant for a wine and spirits wholesaler, retail spirits, retail wine, or retail beer license be a citizen of the United States violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution?
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-18
🔮 To survive that scrutiny, the State would have to show that the citizenship requirement is narrowly tailored to serve a compelling state interest—an onerous standard.
2026-09-18 · Reason
Selling Alcohol Isn't a Political Function · assertive framing

Claims (19 extracted, 2 hedged)

This office has received your request for an Attorney General Opinion in which you ask the following question: Does the requirement in title 37A, section 2-146(A)(1) that an applicant for a wine and spirits wholesaler, retail spirits, retail wine, or retail beer license be a citizen of the United States violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution? asserted
applicant → receive → Constitution
… The citizenship requirement violates the Equal Protection Clause and is unenforceable as applied to noncitizens who are lawfully present in the United States…. asserted
who → violate → States
[The statute] discriminates against lawfully present aliens on the basis of alienage. asserted
statute → discriminate → alienage
State classifications that disadvantage lawfully present aliens are inherently suspect and trigger strict judicial scrutiny. asserted
that → disadvantage → scrutiny
To survive that scrutiny, the State would have to show that the citizenship requirement is narrowly tailored to serve a compelling state interest—an onerous standard. asserted
requirement → survive → interest
It cannot meet that standard. asserted
It → meet → standard
The narrow "political-function" exception that sometimes allows a State to reserve a position to citizens does not extend to a private commercial licensee who sells alcohol. asserted
who → allow → alcohol
{That exception permits a State to reserve only to citizens those positions that "go to the heart of representative government" [such as the positions of police officer, probation officer, or schoolteacher -EV]. asserted
that → permit → officer
It applies only where the officeholder "would necessarily exercise broad discretionary power over the formulation or execution of public policies importantly affecting the citizen population— power of the sort that a self-governing community could properly entrust only to full-fledged members of that community." uncertain
community → apply → community
The U.S. Supreme Court has confined the exception to a relatively limited class of governmental functions and has declined to extend it to occupational licensure; in Bernal, for example, the Court held that a citizenship requirement for notaries public failed strict scrutiny and violated equal protection. asserted
requirement → confine → protection
} And the requirement is neither supported by a compelling interest nor narrowly drawn. asserted
requirement → support → interest
The Act exempts beer distributors from the same citizenship requirement it imposes on other licensees. asserted
it → exempt → licensees
That exemption undercuts any claim that citizenship is essential to the interests the Act serves. uncertain
Act → undercut → interests
The requirement is also overinclusive, because it disqualifies every lawfully present alien regardless of any individualized concern, and underinclusive, because of that same beer-distributor exception. asserted
it → disqualify → exception
The Twenty-first Amendment does not change this analysis; a State's authority to regulate alcohol does not relax the commands of the Equal Protection Clause, whether expressly or by implication. asserted
authority → change → implication
Finally, the companion requirement that an applicant be a qualified elector in this state is unenforceable as applied to lawfully present noncitizens for the same reasons. asserted
applicant → apply → reasons
The elector requirement thus rests on the same citizenship classification. asserted
requirement → rest → classification
This conclusion is confined to lawfully present noncitizens. asserted
conclusion → confine → noncitizens
Nothing in this opinion requires the Alcoholic Beverage Laws Enforcement Commission ("ABLE Commission") to license a person who is unlawfully present, or a lawfully present noncitizen whom federal law does not authorize to engage in the licensed business…. asserted
law → require → business
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support