Photo via Reason

SCOTUS May Soon Determine If California Can Force Doctors To Learn About 'Implicit Bias'

Read the original at Reason ↗
Cite

Ibrahim, R. (2026, September 18). SCOTUS May Soon Determine If California Can Force Doctors To Learn About 'Implicit Bias'. Reason. https://reason.com/2026/09/18/scotus-may-soon-determine-if-california-can-force-doctors-to-learn-about-implicit-bias/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Reason · collected 2026-09-18 · by Reem Ibrahim

Quick Summary

California requires doctors to complete CME courses that include training on implicit bias as part of their license renewal process. This mandate has been challenged by a group of California physicians who argue it violates free speech and is not scientifically grounded. The Supreme Court will consider whether the requirement should be declared unconstitutional at its September 28 conference. Physicians like Azadeh Khatibi, an Iranian-born ophthalmologist, contend that mandatory implicit bias training lacks substantial scientific evidence and may harm medical practice.
Written by AI on 2026-09-18, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In 2022, California introduced a requirement for physicians involved in direct patient care to take continuing medical education (CME) courses that include training on implicit bias. The state defines implicit bias as attitudes or stereotypes that affect perceptions, actions, and decisions, contributing to unequal treatment based on various characteristics including race, ethnicity, gender identity, and sexual orientation. A group of California doctors, including Azadeh Khatibi, an Iranian-born physician, are challenging this requirement in the Supreme Court, arguing it violates their free speech rights. The justices are scheduled to consider the case at a conference on September 28. If accepted, the case could determine whether states can mandate that medical professionals receive training on implicit bias as part of CME requirements.

Written for “Supreme Court Implicit Bias Case” on 2026-11-04, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Supreme Court Implicit Bias Case
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
39
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
8%
3 of 39 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
67/100
Reason's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-18 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Reason · 1100 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Reem Ibrahim
15 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 In European cities, I would often spend evenings hopping between bars on organized bar crawls, but this Halloween I wasn't able to because of Washington, D.C.'s prohibition on pub crawls.
🔮 Under the new plans, many departments could see staffing reductions of anywhere from 20 to 60 percent, according to the letter.
🔮 Singer says that removing barriers that prevent new companies from competing with established providers could not only increase choice but also drive down prices.
🔮 Starting next week, Pennsylvania will begin enforcing a law prohibiting the sale of e-cigarettes that have not been explicitly approved by the state.
🔮 There's no way to guarantee a risk-free environment, that there will not be major hacks, scams, or negative consequences of AI, Altman says.
🔮 On Wednesday, Sen. Rand Paul (R–Ky.) blocked efforts to pass the Senate's Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA)—a bill that would legally require platforms to "exercise reasonable care" in creating any "design feature" that could foreseeably harm minors—through unanimous consent (a fast-track procedure that would only pass if no senator objects).
🔮 And the fact that they also maybe seemed to be interacting in some way also seemed weird and not like typical bot behavior." After assuming they were bots, Blanchard deleted the comments, but then noticed new ones pop up.
🔮 Rep. William Jefferson (D–La.) was famously caught with $90,000 in cash stuffed in his freezer in 2005.
🔮 On Sunday, he said that the arch would, in fact, be a "Military Complex" with "large numbers of drones, plus Snipers.
🔮 "You could have AI deepfakes that were fine as long as they were complimentary," Schulman tells Reason.
Also by Reem Ibrahim
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 15 articles by Reem Ibrahim →

Topics

California Iranian White the Golden State the Supreme Court

Subjects

California GPE · 4× Khatibi PERSON · 3× Singleton PERSON · 3× White PERSON · 3× Reason ORG · 2× Azadeh Khatibi PERSON · 1× Iranian NORP · 1× U.S. GPE · 1× the Golden State GPE · 1× the Supreme Court ORG · 1×

Narrative

In 2022, the Golden State started requiring physicians involved in direct patient care to take CME courses that include training on implicit bias, which the state defines as the "attitudes or internalized stereotypes that affect our perceptions, actions, and decisions," contributing to "unequal treatment of people based on race, ethnicity, gender identity, sexual orientation, age, disability, and other characteristics.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-18
🔮 If that's the case, why on earth would you seek medical care, unless you could be absolutely certain of not being treated by a White physician?

Claims (39 extracted, 3 hedged)

California is notorious for intrusive laws, but when it comes to the medical field, regulatory growth is particularly sprawling. asserted
growth → come → field
As a condition of license renewal, California physicians must log 50 hours of approved continuing medical education (CME) courses every two years. asserted
physicians → log → courses
In 2022, the Golden State started requiring physicians involved in direct patient care to take CME courses that include training on implicit bias, which the state defines as the "attitudes or internalized stereotypes that affect our perceptions, actions, and decisions," contributing to "unequal treatment of people based on race, ethnicity, gender identity, sexual orientation, age, disability, and other characteristics. asserted
that → start → race
This requirement violates free speech, according to a group of California doctors who are asking the Supreme Court to hear their case and declare the law unconstitutional. uncertain
law → violate → case
The justices are scheduled to consider the petition at their September 28 conference. asserted
justices → schedule → conference
One of the plaintiffs, Azadeh Khatibi, is an Iranian-born physician who moved to the U.S. when she was 6. asserted
she → bear → U.S.
After completing her joint medical degree program at the University of California (U.C.), San Francisco, and U.C., Berkeley, she became an ophthalmology specialist in Los Angeles. asserted
she → complete → Angeles
She has taught CME courses in California for several years. asserted
She → teach → years
"I think it is dangerous for the state to mandate the speech of physicians when they are teaching other physicians, and for the state to get overly involved in the practice of medicine," Khatibi tells Reason. asserted
Khatibi → think → Reason
"I've never said I dislike implicit bias training. asserted
I → say → ?
I've actually taught mindfulness and about the power of the subconscious mind," but "the data on implicit bias training is still nascent and controversial." asserted
data → teach → training
"This law, which requires the teaching of strategies as a major part of it, is not based in science," she adds. asserted
she → require → science
"Not only is the state mandating the private speech of doctors, which is unconstitutional, it is furthermore mandating speech on a topic around which the science and methodology are poorly evidenced." asserted
science → mandate → which
Indeed, there is little evidence that compulsory implicit bias trainings actually reduce discrimination. asserted
trainings → be → discrimination
A 2019 meta-analysis covering 492 studies and more than 87,000 participants found that interventions "generally produced trivial changes in behavior," and there is "little evidence that changes in implicit measures translated into changes in explicit measures and behavior." asserted
changes → cover → measures
In some cases, these trainings have been found to increase discrimination. asserted
trainings → find → discrimination
A 2026 study published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology found that mandatory "diversity training leads to increased reactance." asserted
training → publish → reactance
To Marilyn Singleton, one of the plaintiffs in the case, these diversity requirements can also hurt patients. asserted
requirements → hurt → patients
In a 2023 Washington Post op-ed, in which she described her experience as "a Black woman in a [medical] class of mostly White men," Singleton wrote: "Black people are, in effect, being told that White physicians are likely to quite literally damage our health. asserted
physicians → describe → health
If that's the case, why on earth would you seek medical care, unless you could be absolutely certain of not being treated by a White physician? uncertain
you → seek → physician
"Requiring every instructor of continuing medical education to include discussion of implicit bias is compelled speech that the First Amendment prohibits," Caleb Trotter, a senior attorney at Pacific Legal Foundation who is representing Khatibi and Singleton, tells Reason. asserted
who → require → Reason
"This is compelling instructors to teach this specific subject matter, whether they like it, whether they agree or believe in it or not, and whether they even have any expertise on it. asserted
they → compel → it
In August 2023, the doctors, along with the medical advocacy organization Do No Harm, filed a federal lawsuit in the District Court of the Central District of California, which the court later dismissed. asserted
court → file → which
In 2025, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the plaintiffs' challenge and affirmed the district court's ruling. asserted
Court → reject → ruling
The appellate court held that California's implicit bias requirements in CME training amounted to "government speech"—a legal doctrine that says the government can speak for itself without being barred by the Free Speech Clause—and therefore did not violate the First Amendment. asserted
government → hold → Amendment
"So what they're saying is: Continuing education is government speech just as the same as if it was a state employee, a state public school teacher, or the 'Got Milk?' advertising campaign from years ago," says Trotter. asserted
Trotter → say → Milk
He argues that California is trying to stretch that principle to cover "private speakers speaking in their private capacity in private courses accredited by private organizations." asserted
California → argue → organizations
Trotter describes this law as a "massive expansion of the government speech doctrine," saying that if the Supreme Court does not prevent it, "there's nothing to stop any state in the future from requiring professionals of all kinds to include any manner of the hot social topics of the day in professional licensing." The Supreme Court has ruled in favor of free speech in similar cases. asserted
Court → describe → cases
In NIFLA v. Becerra (2018), the Court ruled that California could not force licensed pregnancy centers to advertise state abortion services simply because they were regulated professionals. uncertain
they → rule → services
The ruling stated that "this Court has never recognized 'professional speech' as a separate category of speech subject to different rules. asserted
Court → state → rules
Speech is not unprotected merely because it is uttered by professionals." asserted
it → utter → professionals
California is not the only state that now mandates implicit bias training for medical professionals. asserted
that → mandate → professionals
In 2020, Michigan Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer issued an executive directive establishing the same requirement, which the Pacific Legal Foundation is challenging in court. asserted
Foundation → issue → court
Massachusetts, Washington, and Maryland all have similar requirements, with Maryland requiring both implicit bias and "structural racism" training for all first license or certificate renewals. asserted
Maryland → have → renewals
These laws are examples of a myriad of occupational licensing restrictions that gatekeep work and push up prices. asserted
that → push → prices
Because the United States has "a very large, intrusive occupational licensing regime," says Trotter, we end up with "inevitable mission creep." asserted
we → have → creep
Roughly 1 in 5 employed Americans now need a government-issued license to do their jobs, and those barriers raise prices by restricting competition without necessarily improving public safety. asserted
barriers → employ → safety
This case does not just have implications for free speech. asserted
case → have → speech
It is also a warning about what happens when governments gain expansive power to decide who is allowed to work—and on what terms. asserted
who → happen → terms
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support