Photo via Daily Mail

Parliament bell ringer ordered to sell his £1million London mews home after losing court battle over decision to rip out his banker neighbour's gate on the day he moved in

Read the original at Daily Mail ↗
Cite

Brady, J. (2026, September 18). Parliament bell ringer ordered to sell his £1million London mews home after losing court battle over decision to rip out his banker neighbour's gate on the day he moved in. Daily Mail. https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16141831/parliament-bell-ringer-ordered-sell-home-gate.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Daily Mail · collected 2026-09-18 · by Jon Brady

Quick Summary

Adrian Udal, a 66-year-old Parliament bell ringer, has been ordered by the High Court to sell his £1 million London home after refusing to compensate his banker neighbors for damaging their property. In August 2023, Udal removed a gate and door belonging to Nicholas Patrick-Hiley upon the latter’s move into his newly purchased mews cottage in Fulham. The court ruled that Udal's actions were "wanton destruction," and he was initially ordered to pay £10,000 plus legal fees of £85,000. When Udal failed to comply with these payments, the judge today enforced an order for the sale of his home to recover the debt owed to the Patrick-Hileys, now totaling around £129,500 including additional costs.
Written by AI on 2026-09-18, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In August 2023, Adrian Udal, a 66-year-old Parliament bell ringer, tore out the front gate and door of his new banker neighbor's £2 million mews cottage in Fulham just as the financier was arriving at his newly purchased home. This act led to a bitter legal battle that spanned three years. The Patrick-Hileys, who bought the property intending it for their retirement, sued Udal after learning he had a dispute with the previous occupant but thought it resolved.

In November 2023, Judge Nicholas Parfitt ruled in favor of the Patrick-Hileys, describing Udal's actions as "carefully pre-planned" and "wanton destruction." Despite this verdict, Udal refused to pay any compensation or cover his neighbors' legal expenses. Consequently, in June 2025, he was ordered by the High Court to sell his £1 million London home, along with an initial payment of £85,000 for the Patrick-Hileys’ legal fees and daily accruing interest, bringing the total owed to around £129,500. Udal's defiance in not paying a penny has resulted in this extreme measure by the court.

Written for “Property Dispute UK” on 2026-11-02, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Property Dispute UK
Crime & Law · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
23
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
9%
2 of 23 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
68/100
Daily Mail's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Crime & Law
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-18 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Daily Mail · 8751 article(s) · 21 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 21 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Jon Brady
25 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Football fan Stephen Crean bravely offered assurance to fellow travellers on a train as Anthony Williams, 33, allegedly launched what prosecutors called a 'rampage' onboard the LNER service from Doncaster to London on November 1 last year.
🔮 Discount chain Poundland is reportedly set to enter administration after its owners, who bought the firm for £1, rejected a rescue deal.
🔮 From April, vape shops will no longer be eligible for the 5p discounted rate offered to retail, hospitality or leisure businesses, nor can they claim SBRR.
🔮 But suppliers are concerned that the Be Ready campaign could encourage the kind of hoarding seen during Covid as shelves run bare and online retailers run out of stock.
🔮 Criminologists have warned that the show – which has produced three spin-offs – could be providing a 'how-to script' for copycat killers and would-be murderers.
🔮 The website for the poppy also features a video carrying the slogan 'from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free', which has been interpreted by Jewish organisations as a call for the destruction of Israel.
🔮 The 45-year-old, who had been a friend of Prince William at university, died without making a will, according to documents reviewed by the Daily Mail. The High Court granted letters of administration to his mother Monica Duncan, of Frome in Somerset, in July this year.
🔮 Lord Archer had been entertaining fans at the Leicester Square Theatre in central London on Sunday as he promoted what he had said would be his final book, Adam and Eve, alongside friend Gyles Brandreth.
🔮 I love England, I love Corby,' he said, adding: 'Everyone knows that Hamas is a terrorist organisation that would kill us if we didn't speak against the Jews while living there.
Also by Jon Brady
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 25 articles by Jon Brady →

Topics

Daily Mail Fulham London Parliament the High Court

Subjects

Udal PERSON · 14× Adrian Udal PERSON · 2× Fulham ORG · 2× Patrick-Hiley PERSON · 2× Daily Mail ORG · 1× Lisa PERSON · 1× London GPE · 1× Nicholas Patrick-Hiley's PERSON · 1× Parliament ORG · 1× Patrick PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Adrian Udal (rear) is seen demolishing the roller door leading to Nicholas and Lisa Patrick-Hiley's new home in Fulham in August 2023 Mr Udal (pictured) has been ordered to sell his home after refusing to pay a penny of compensation or his neighbours' legal expenses The Patrick-Hileys (pictured) had been made aware of a dispute between Mr Udal and the home's previous occupant but had thought it resolved Today, the High Court ordered the sale of Mr Udal's home after hearing that he had yet to pay a single penny of the £129,500 he now owed to the Patrick-Hileys – and had 'no intention' of paying anything to them at all.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-18
🔮 - See more Daily Mail on Google - save us as a Preferred Source A Parliament bell ringer who tore out the front gate to his banker neighbour's house will lose his £1million London home after a court ordered its sale.

Claims (23 extracted, 2 hedged)

- See more Daily Mail on Google - save us as a Preferred Source A Parliament bell ringer who tore out the front gate to his banker neighbour's house will lose his £1million London home after a court ordered its sale. asserted
court → see → sale
Adrian Udal, 66, tore out the roller gate and door leading to Nicholas Patrick-Hiley's £2million mews cottage in Disbrowe Road, Fulham in August 2023 – just as Mr Patrick-Hiley was arriving at his new home after completing the purchase. asserted
Hiley → tear → purchase
The financier had planned to make the property a dream retirement home for himself and wife Lisa, 63 – but Mr Udal's actions pitched the couple into a bitter legal battle that has run for three years. asserted
that → plan → years
Mr Udal, whose home sits adjacent to and above the entrance to the mews, insisted he had a right to do what he did as he owned the land the gate was on. But the Patrick-Hileys sued and won last year over what Judge Nicholas Parfitt labelled Mr Udal's 'carefully pre-planned' act of 'wanton destruction'. asserted
Parfitt → sit → destruction
The bell ringer was told to pay his neighbours £10,000 in June 2025, before being handed an £85,000 bill for their legal fees, not including his own. asserted
ringer → tell → own
The order included daily accruing interest. asserted
order → include → interest
Adrian Udal (rear) is seen demolishing the roller door leading to Nicholas and Lisa Patrick-Hiley's new home in Fulham in August 2023 Mr Udal (pictured) has been ordered to sell his home after refusing to pay a penny of compensation or his neighbours' legal expenses The Patrick-Hileys (pictured) had been made aware of a dispute between Mr Udal and the home's previous occupant but had thought it resolved Today, the High Court ordered the sale of Mr Udal's home after hearing that he had yet to pay a single penny of the £129,500 he now owed to the Patrick-Hileys – and had 'no intention' of paying anything to them at all. asserted
he → see → them
Judge Deputy Master Martin Dray said: 'The claimants are out of pocket and owed a considerable amount of money, which is ever increasing. ' asserted
which → say → money
The defendant has made no attempt to repay any part of it...quite the contrary, he has disclaimed any liability to pay one penny piece.' asserted
he → make → piece
The couple were granted an order of possession and sale to obtain the money they were owed in order to recover their debts. asserted
they → grant → debts
Deputy Master Dray said there had been a 'frosty conversation' between the neighbours after Christmas last year when Mr Udal – who had already lost a bid to appeal – 'made it quite clear he had no intention of making any payments'. asserted
he → say → payments
He said Mr Udal had not engaged in the proceedings relating to the sale of his house, but that he could not be allowed to 'derail' the case, and went on to make the order in his absence. 'It seems to me that, on the evidence before the court, the scales are tipped decisively in favour of the claimants, and making an order enforcing the charging orders by way of sale and possession,' he said. uncertain
he → say → sale
The sale order is to enable the couple to enforce a debt from the original case which now stands at around £104,500, but Mr Udal was also ordered to pay a further £25,000 in costs of the hearing today. asserted
Udal → enable → hearing
The judge said that possession of the house would have to be handed over within 28 days, but that it would not be enforced if Mr Udal pays up before October 2. asserted
Udal → say → October
The entrance to the mews home, which runs underneath Mr Udal's home, before it was torn out The entrance after Mr Udal tore out the roller gate and door himself - landing himself in hot water asserted
Udal → run → water
The entrance to the home runs directly under Mr Udal's home - a passageway to which, the court ruled, they had every legal right Mr Udal is a veteran bell-ringer, whose role involved liaising with clergy when bellringing is needed for special church, state and parliamentary events, while he is proud to have 'rung in' the New Year almost every year since 2000. In 2021, he was appointed secretary of the belfry at St Margaret's Church next to Westminster Abbey, which acts as a place of worship for the Houses of Parliament. asserted
which → run → Parliament
Mr Patrick-Hiley is a retired financier and former managing director and head of sales for North America investment banking specialists Panmure Gordon. asserted
Hiley → retire → Gordon
During the trial at Mayor's and City County Court last year, Judge Parfitt was told how the two neighbouring homes are in an unusual layout, with the Patrick-Hileys' house located behind Mr Udal's property and reachable across a drive and through a passageway, which passes under part of his house and into their courtyard. asserted
which → tell → courtyard
The drive and passageway are owned by Mr Udal, but the couple have the right to pass over it to get to their house, the court heard. asserted
court → own → house
Mr Patrick-Hiley had arrived at the property on the day of completion shortly after midday in August 2023 to find Mr Udal and another man destroying the gates. asserted
Udal → arrive → gates
The couple had been made aware of a conflict between the last owner of their home and Mr Udal, but had contacted him offering him the opportunity to give input on 'better looking and more functional gates' they planned to install. asserted
they → make → gates
They considered the matter closed – until he was seen ripping out fixtures, seemingly to install his own set of metal barriers that he purchased a month prior. asserted
he → consider → that
Mr Udal said he was asserting his legitimate rights as freeholder to the land – but his defence was dismissed by an unimpressed Judge Parfitt, who described him as a 'poor witness who came across as preferring his own perception of what might be helpful to his own case, regardless of any objective reality'. uncertain
what → say → reality
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support