Photo via New York Post

Microsoft, OpenAI workers privately worried their work is ‘largest theft of labor in human history’

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Herzlich, T. (2026, September 18). Microsoft, OpenAI workers privately worried their work is ‘largest theft of labor in human history’. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/09/18/business/microsoft-openai-workers-privately-worried-their-work-is-largest-theft-of-labor-in-human-history/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-09-18 · by Taylor Herzlich

Quick Summary

Microsoft and OpenAI employees are privately expressing concerns that the companies' practice of using millions of news articles to train AI systems constitutes a significant exploitation of intellectual property. Internal documents reveal fears that this could be viewed as an "astounding theft of unprecedented proportions." While one executive at OpenAI acknowledged the potential existential threat their products pose to publishers, both firms maintain they are not in violation of copyright laws since the original content is transformed into new material by AI models.
Written by AI on 2026-09-19, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In a recent court filing unsealed in Manhattan federal court, executives from OpenAI and its major investor Microsoft admitted that large language models (LLMs) are undermining news publishers' business models through what they call a "doom loop." This loop involves LLMs using vast amounts of copyrighted content without permission, which then cannibalizes readership and revenue for the original publishers. An internal Microsoft document states this is an "unusual situation where an end-product threatens the economic foundations of its essential suppliers."

Executives like Brent Hecht, director of applied science at Microsoft, warned that AI models could harm both internet integrity and their own business by undermining news outlets’ sustainability. This admission comes as part of a long-running copyright infringement lawsuit filed by The New York Times against the companies over unauthorized use of copyrighted content for training LLMs like ChatGPT. The court documents reveal executives' private concerns that scraping millions of articles without consent amounts to "the largest theft of labor in human history." Despite these internal fears, Microsoft and OpenAI continue to defend their practices publicly by arguing they are protected under fair use laws since the AI transforms original content into new material.

Written for “AI Impact on Web Copyright” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 5 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 AI Impact on Web Copyright
Technology · 6 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 75% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 3 of 15 claims Outlet record 70/100
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 1 claims Outlet record 66/100
404 Media
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 1 of 20 claims Outlet record 95/100
Persuasion
Hedges 22 of 113 claims
“The articles discuss different concerns regarding AI and its impact; one focuses on rogue AI agents committing crimes, while the other addresses workers' worries about labor theft in AI development.”
404 Media
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 11 claims Outlet record 95/100
“The articles discuss different aspects and concerns related to AI development by OpenAI, but do not describe the same specific incident.”
New York Post
Hedges 4 of 21 claims Outlet record 66/100
CBS News
Hedges 4 of 15 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different legal issues involving AI companies, one about theft of labor and the other about an alleged antitrust violation from slowing down AI development.”
The Independent
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 13 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles discuss different legal issues related to AI companies but describe distinct events and concerns.”
Mother Jones
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 4 of 46 claims Outlet record 60/100
“While both articles discuss concerns about AI companies using copyrighted material without proper compensation, they do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 3 of 21 claims Outlet record 66/100
“While both articles discuss similar concerns and court filings related to OpenAI and Microsoft's AI training practices, they appear to be reporting on different aspects or documents within a larger ongoing case.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
4
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
75%
3 of 4 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
6
Technology
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-19 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 16258 article(s) · 35 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 35 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Taylor Herzlich
64 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 “Our commitment remains unchanged: Binance will bear the financial impact of the stolen funds.
🔮 A notorious North Korean hacking unit may have compromised a single Binance employee’s laptop to pull off the record-breaking $6.3 billion hack of the cryptocurrency exchange – indicating a potential inside job or a stunning AI-powered infiltration of the company’s software.
🔮 But it wasn’t enough to squash fears over its massive spending plans, as Amazon reaffirmed its 2026 capex forecast of $220 billion.
🔮 If the stock closes down more than 9.77% in Thursday’s session, it will be the worst reaction in the company’s 22-year history and the second-largest single-day loss of any stock.
🔮 The Federal Reserve held interest rates steady Wednesday, even as inflation data has been worsening – but the central bank is largely expected to issue a quarter-point hike in December.
🔮 “Maybe we don’t have the hard power.
🔮 Trump told reporters late Wednesday that “something one way or another” will “happen fairly soon” in Iran.
🔮 Ackman said he has some friends in the Democratic Party, like New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker – but that he can’t think of a single candidate who could win his vote in the 2028 presidential election.
🔮 “Everyone’s talking about ‘tokenize this, tokenize that, tokenizing securities,’” Cuomo – who suffered a brutal defeat to NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani last year – told the Wall Street Journal earlier this month.
🔮 Defense stocks have plummeted over the past few weeks as investors grow convinced Dems will emerge victorious in the midterm elections – potentially thwarting President Trump’s plans for huge military spending.
Also by Taylor Herzlich
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 64 articles by Taylor Herzlich →

Topics

ChatGPT LLMs Microsoft OpenAI the New York Times’

Subjects

Microsoft ORG · 3× OpenAI ORG · 3× ChatGPT ORG · 1× LLMs ORG · 1× the New York Times’ ORG · 1×

Narrative

But publicly, Microsoft and OpenAI have defended their scraping of news stories off the internet, saying they did not violate copyright rules because the articles were turned into completely new content by their AI models.
framing: speculative · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-19
🔮 Microsoft and OpenAI workers privately shared concerns that their use of millions of news articles to develop AI bots could represent the “largest theft of labor in human history,” according to newly unsealed court docs.

Claims (4 extracted, 3 hedged)

Microsoft and OpenAI workers privately shared concerns that their use of millions of news articles to develop AI bots could represent the “largest theft of labor in human history,” according to newly unsealed court docs. uncertain
use → share → docs
One internal Microsoft document from 2023 warned that millions of people would consider LLMs “hoovering up” their work to be “an astonishing theft of unprecedented proportions,” according to legal filings revealed as part of the New York Times’ case against the two firms. uncertain
LLMs → warn → firms
OpenAI’s head of ChatGPT, meanwhile, acknowledged that the company’s products pose an “existential threat” to publishers, according to another internal document. uncertain
products → acknowledge → document
But publicly, Microsoft and OpenAI have defended their scraping of news stories off the internet, saying they did not violate copyright rules because the articles were turned into completely new content by their AI models. asserted
articles → defend → models
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support