Photo via Dawn

Lawyers’ body to boycott Islamabad court proceedings on Saturday in protest against Imaan, Hadi’s rearrest

Read the original at Dawn ↗
Cite

Asad, M. (2026, September 18). Lawyers’ body to boycott Islamabad court proceedings on Saturday in protest against Imaan, Hadi’s rearrest. Dawn. https://www.dawn.com/news/2030882/lawyers-body-to-boycott-islamabad-court-proceedings-on-saturday-in-protest-against-imaan-hadis-rearrest

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Dawn · collected 2026-09-18 · by Malik Asad

Quick Summary

The Islamabad Bar Association has announced that lawyers will boycott court proceedings in Islamabad on September 19 to protest the rearrest of human rights lawyer Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir and her husband Hadi Ali Chattha. The couple was arrested again shortly after their release from a previous arrest ordered by the Supreme Court, this time under charges related to another case filed at Kohsar police station in March 2025. The bar association claims that the rearrest undermines judicial proceedings and violates fundamental rights, while Amnesty International describes it as a politically motivated attempt to punish human rights defenders.
Written by AI on 2026-09-18, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On Thursday, human rights lawyer Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir and her husband Hadi Ali Chattha were rearrested hours after the Supreme Court of Pakistan suspended their 17-year sentences for charges under the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act related to social media posts. The couple was originally arrested for allegedly chanting anti-government slogans and blocking roads, leading to their arrest in a second case soon after their release from Adiala jail. An anti-terrorism court subsequently remanded them back into custody.

This swift rearrest has sparked widespread criticism and condemnation from journalists and lawyers across Pakistan, with many labeling the actions as a "mockery of justice." The Islamabad Bar Association (IBA) has announced a boycott of all court proceedings in the federal capital on Saturday, September 19, to protest against Imaan and Hadi's continued detention despite the Supreme Court’s ruling. The re-imprisonment is viewed as an attack on legal professionals and their commitment to defending victims of state abuse. Amnesty International has also weighed in, emphasizing the need for justice and human rights protection in Pakistan.

Written for “Imaan Hadi Sentencing” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 8 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Imaan Hadi Sentencing
Politics · 9 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Dawn
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 0 of 12 claims Outlet record 72/100
Dawn
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 1 of 27 claims Outlet record 72/100
Dawn
Hedges 0 of 7 claims Outlet record 72/100
“While both articles discuss Imaan and Hadi's legal situation, Article A describes the suspension of their sentences by the Supreme Court, whereas Article B reports on their rearrest after their release, indicating a different specific event.”
Dawn
Hedges 0 of 23 claims Outlet record 72/100
Dawn
Hedges 5 of 34 claims Outlet record 72/100
“The articles describe different events related to legal issues and protests, but they are not describing the same specific incident.”
Restrained court Same event
Dawn
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 1 of 20 claims Outlet record 72/100
Dawn
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 2 of 10 claims Outlet record 72/100
“The articles describe different but related events: one about delays in hearing their appeal, and another about their rearrest after being ordered to be released on bail.”
Dawn
Hedges 2 of 20 claims Outlet record 72/100
“While both articles discuss Imaan and Hadi's legal issues, Article A reports on the Supreme Court suspending their sentences and ordering their release, whereas Article B discusses their rearrest in a separate case after this development.”
Dawn
Hedges 5 of 48 claims Outlet record 72/100
“While both articles discuss the arrest and remand of Imaan Mazari and Hadi Chattha, Article A describes their immediate judicial remand after the SC suspension of sentences, whereas Article B reports on a boycott announcement in response to their rearrest later in time.”
Dawn
Hedges 5 of 53 claims Outlet record 72/100
“While both articles refer to Imaan and Hadi being rearrested after their sentences were suspended by the Supreme Court, Article A describes the immediate judicial proceedings following their arrest, while Article B reports on a subsequent protest reaction by lawyers in response to the couple's rearrest.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
18
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 18 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
72/100
Dawn's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
9
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-18 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Dawn · 2602 article(s) · 3 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 3 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Malik Asad
44 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The judgement clarified that although police could maintain internal records of criminal cases for official purposes, such information could not be disclosed in character certificates issued to citizens, particularly when these were required for travelling abroad.
🔮 Following the completion of the trial and final arguments, the court reserved its verdict and said that it would be pronounced on Oct 29.
🔮 “But we surrender ourselves before the ultimate court where we all must return one day, where all will be held accountable for what they have done.”
🔮 He will preside over a single bench at the Rawalpindi registry.
🔮 While offering yet another opportunity to human rights lawyer Imaan Zainab Hazir-Mazari and her husband Hadi Ali Chattha to record their statements in a security breach case, an anti-terrorism court (ATC) on Saturday warned them that a verdict could come even without their testimony if they refused.
2026-10-25 · assertive framing · ATC warns Imaan, husband of verdict sans testimony
🔮 Meanwhile, no prosecution witness could be cross-examined during Thursday’s hearing amid the dispute over the state counsel’s appointment.
🔮 Justice Malik remarked with a smile, “In that case, you might as well remove our badges too, as we are also currently serving as additional judges.”
🔮 Describing the charge as the foundation of a trial, Azad maintained that any defect in its framing would undermine the legality of the subsequent proceedings.
🔮 He warned that they could face imprisonment if it was not presented before the court.
🔮 On the application filed by the defence, he said, “I have received your applications; I will issue an order regarding this.
Also by Malik Asad
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 44 articles by Malik Asad →

Topics

Amnesty International IBA ISLAMABAD The Islamabad Bar Association the Supreme Court

Subjects

Imaan PERSON · 6× Hadi PERSON · 5× IBA ORG · 3× Amnesty International ORG · 2× ISLAMABAD GPE · 2× Adiala GPE · 1× Hadi Ali Chattha PERSON · 1× Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir PERSON · 1× The Islamabad Bar Association ORG · 1× the Supreme Court ORG · 1×

Narrative

The Islamabad Bar Association (IBA) has announced a boycott of court proceedings in the federal capital on Saturday (September 19) to protest the rearrest of human rights lawyer Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir and her husband, Hadi Ali Chattha, after the Supreme Court suspended their sentences and ordered their release on bail.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-18
🔮 The IBA expressed concern over the couple’s rearrest in a statement on Friday and announced that lawyers would not appear before any court in the capital on Sept 19 (Saturday).

Claims (18 extracted, 0 hedged)

The Islamabad Bar Association (IBA) has announced a boycott of court proceedings in the federal capital on Saturday (September 19) to protest the rearrest of human rights lawyer Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir and her husband, Hadi Ali Chattha, after the Supreme Court suspended their sentences and ordered their release on bail. asserted
Court → announce → bail
Imaan and Hadi were arrested late on Thursday in a second case after the SC ordered their release in a case pertaining to their posts on social media. asserted
SC → arrest → media
The couple was sentenced to 17 years on multiple charges under the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (Peca) in the case. asserted
couple → sentence → case
However, soon after their release on Thursday, Islamabad police personnel arrested the two outside Adiala jail in connection with another case and produced them before an anti-terrorism court, which sent them to jail on judicial remand. asserted
which → arrest → remand
The second case was registered at the federal capital’s Kohsar police station on March 22, 2025 on a complaint by City Magistrate Ghulam Murtaza Chandio. asserted
case → register → Chandio
Imaan and her husband were accused of chanting anti-government slogans and blocking roads and were named in the first information report (FIR). asserted
Imaan → accuse → report
The IBA expressed concern over the couple’s rearrest in a statement on Friday and announced that lawyers would not appear before any court in the capital on Sept 19 (Saturday). asserted
lawyers → express → Sept
The bar association said the arrest undermined the sanctity of judicial proceedings and amounted to a violation of fundamental rights and the rule of law. asserted
arrest → say → law
It also expressed strong reservations over the practice of arresting individuals in connection with “unknown” FIRs. asserted
It → express → FIRs
The IBA held that any attempt to circumvent or frustrate court orders was unacceptable. asserted
attempt → hold → orders
It demanded the immediate release of Imaan and Hadi and called for complete details of the cases and circumstances surrounding their arrests to be made public. asserted
details → demand → arrests
The association vowed to take every possible measure to safeguard judicial independence, uphold the rule of law and protect fundamental human rights. asserted
association → vow → rights
Amnesty International, HRCP demand immediate and unconditional release Global rights watchdog Amnesty International condemned the arrest and held that the action demonstrated “authorities’ willingness to weaponise the legal system against critical voices”. asserted
action → demand → voices
“Imaan and Hadi’s re-arrest dispels any pretence that the charges against them are anything other than a politically motivated attempt to punish them for their human rights work,” rights body’s South Asia director, Babu Ram Pant, said in a statement. asserted
director → dispel → statement
Pant held that charges were “not only absurd, but an insult to their lifelong commitment to human rights”. asserted
charges → hold → rights
The official called on the Pakistani authorities to release the couple immediately and “unconditionally, with no further charges to prolong their detention”. asserted
official → call → detention
“Imaan and Hadi should be free to meet their friends and family and to do the work they love – representing victims of human rights violations.” asserted
they → meet → violations
Meanwhile, the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, in a post on X, also demanded Imaan and Hadi’s release and withdrawal of all cases against them. asserted
Commission → demand → them
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support