Photo via Reason

Montana Is Trying To Break the FDA's Monopoly on Experimental Treatments

Read the original at Reason ↗
Cite

Pauzé, J. (2026, September 18). Montana Is Trying To Break the FDA's Monopoly on Experimental Treatments. Reason. https://reason.com/2026/09/18/montana-is-trying-to-break-the-fdas-monopoly-on-experimental-treatments/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Reason · collected 2026-09-18 · by Josh Pauzé

Quick Summary

Montana has implemented a new law allowing patients with any condition to receive experimental treatments without FDA approval through state-licensed centers, as long as the treatment has passed Phase 1 clinical trials and received private board approval. This initiative aims to reduce costs and provide quicker access to potentially beneficial therapies compared to the standard FDA process. However, critics such as ethicist Arthur Caplan argue that this program lacks proper oversight and could lead to unregulated commercial exploitation of patients seeking experimental treatments.
Written by AI on 2026-09-18, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Montana lawmakers have introduced a novel "right-to-try" program allowing patients with any condition to bypass FDA approval for experimental therapies. This contrasts with the federal Right to Try Act signed by President Trump in 2017, which restricts access to life-threatening conditions and bars companies from profiting. In Montana, Senate Bill 535 permits treatment through state-licensed centers if it has cleared Phase 1 trials and received private board approval, regardless of patient condition. The law went into effect last month when the first treatment for hearing loss was approved under this new framework. Critics like Arthur Caplan warn that such programs could undermine federal regulations and safety standards, while proponents argue they provide relief from rising healthcare costs.

Written for “Montana Fda Challenge” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Montana Fda Challenge
Health · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
31
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
19%
6 of 31 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
67/100
Reason's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Health
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-18 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Reason · 1051 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Josh Pauzé
8 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Those comments, along with an alleged shove, could land him in jail for up to five years.
🔮 We will not stop fighting until this family gets the truth," he added.
🔮 The court "seemed to take the view that any dollar spent on other educational programs like scholarships is a dollar that could be spent on public schools instead, but that's not how budgeting works," he says.
🔮 "Improperly used J-1 visa classifications to avoid employment obligations, exploit taxpayer-funded programs, and undermine American workers will not be tolerated."
2026-10-13 · assertive framing · No, Giving Immigrants Research Jobs Is Not Fraud​
🔮 Starting next year, school choice will be a more attainable option for many American families.
🔮 As Americans face rising healthcare costs, Montana is offering a novel right-to-try program that lawmakers hope will bring relief to consumers in the state.
🔮 The law, which will go into effect on October 1, 2027, was signed by Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom last month.
Also by Josh Pauzé
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 8 articles by Josh Pauzé →

Topics

Americans FDA Food and Drug Administration Montana Right to Try Act

Subjects

Montana GPE · 6× FDA ORG · 3× Anzinger PERSON · 2× Caplan PERSON · 2× Americans NORP · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× Food and Drug Administration ORG · 1× Infinita City GPE · 1× Niklas Anzinger PERSON · 1× the Montana Legislature ORG · 1×

Narrative

Arthur Caplan, former head of the division of medical ethics at New York University Grossman School of Medicine, told Business Insider, "This thing they set up in Montana is really a program to facilitate access to anybody and everybody who wants it, to novel experimental interventions for anything."
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-18
🔮 As Americans face rising healthcare costs, Montana is offering a novel right-to-try program that lawmakers hope will bring relief to consumers in the state.

Claims (31 extracted, 6 hedged)

As Americans face rising healthcare costs, Montana is offering a novel right-to-try program that lawmakers hope will bring relief to consumers in the state. asserted
lawmakers → face → state
The program allows patients with any condition to bypass the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval process and access experimental therapies. asserted
patients → allow → therapies
Last month, the program approved its first treatment for hearing loss, but the looming threat of federal enforcement could derail the experiment. uncertain
threat → approve → experiment
The federal Right to Try Act, signed by President Donald Trump in his first term, allows patients with life-threatening conditions to access experimental therapies that have passed Phase 1 of clinical trials. asserted
that → try → trials
Last year, the Montana Legislature passed Senate Bill 535, which expanded that access to any patient, regardless of condition, offering treatment through state-licensed centers. asserted
which → pass → centers
Unlike the federal program, which bars companies from profiting, Montana's law allows companies to charge what they like. asserted
they → bar → what
As long as the treatment has cleared Phase 1, has been approved by a private review board, the patient gives informed consent, and a provider recommends it, they can access it. asserted
they → clear → it
Proponents of the program argue that the expensive costs of the FDA approval process stifle competition, drive up costs, and prevent potentially beneficial treatments from reaching patients. asserted
costs → argue → patients
Niklas Anzinger, founder of Infinita City, a biotech hub in the Honduran special economic zone Próspera, worked with the Alliance for Longevity Initiatives, a Virginia-based industry group, to draft the law and assembled the only active review board. asserted
Anzinger → work → board
Anzinger described the program on the Stranded Technologies Podcast as one that could offer "a potential paradigm change in how we do science instead of top-down, more bottom-up, but still in a controlled way with oversight and everything." uncertain
we → describe → oversight
Anzinger argues that by freeing small companies from having to conduct costly clinical trials, Montana's system will give patients cheaper costs and access to therapies that they wouldn't have otherwise had. asserted
they → argue → that
According to Politico, he told lawmakers that by passing the law, Montana "would no doubt have the potential to become the world's leader in accelerating patient access to innovative, potentially life-saving treatments." uncertain
Montana → accord → treatments
During debate over the bill, state Rep. Kathy Love (R–Hamilton) questioned whose interests it served. asserted
it → question → interests
"In the committee, also, the proponents were the biotech industry," Love said. asserted
Love → say → committee
Arthur Caplan, former head of the division of medical ethics at New York University Grossman School of Medicine, told Business Insider, "This thing they set up in Montana is really a program to facilitate access to anybody and everybody who wants it, to novel experimental interventions for anything." asserted
who → tell → anything
Caplan compared the program to a prediction market rather than medical research. " asserted
Caplan → compare → research
It's like, you want to gamble? asserted
you → want → ?
Caplan inadvertently made a useful analogy. asserted
Caplan → make → analogy
Montana's program is like a prediction market: It lets people evaluate all the market's options and decide based on their own judgment. asserted
people → let → judgment
Regulating drugs is also a gamble. asserted
Regulating → regulate → drugs
The regulator gambles that they will help patients by restricting harmful drugs more than they hurt them by limiting access to beneficial drugs or discouraging their production altogether. asserted
they → gamble → production
The question is: Who gets to gamble with the patient's health? asserted
Who → get → health
The patient or the regulator? The Federal Right to Try program was intended to remedy this problem by giving terminally ill patients access to experimental therapies, but the program has hardly lived up to its promise. asserted
program → try → promise
The FDA's latest report shows that from 2018 to 2025, companies have offered a grand total of only 27 products through the program and just six last year. asserted
companies → show → program
As Jeffrey A. Singer, a practicing surgeon and senior fellow at the Cato Institute, wrote for Reason earlier this year, "Companies often decline because of cost, liability concerns, and the risk that adverse outcomes could complicate approval." uncertain
outcomes → practice → approval
"Meanwhile," Singer added, "because the FDA still controls final approval, companies have strong incentives to avoid anything that might jeopardize it." uncertain
that → add → it
In June, "a group that included Infinita, patient advocates, and biotech companies" met with FDA officials to request assurance that the agency would not take action against them in Montana. asserted
agency → include → Montana
The group didn't receive a definitive response, according to Business Insider. uncertain
group → receive → Insider
Montana's program broadens patient choice and provides increased incentive for companies to participate, but as the federal program demonstrated, creating a framework for a drug to be offered is only half the battle. asserted
drug → broaden → framework
The gap in patient access ultimately comes down to the FDA's monopoly on who gets to market and sell nationwide, and that can't be fully rectified through state programs. asserted
that → come → programs
"Montana can remove barriers that prevent patients from accessing experimental treatments, but it cannot remove the FDA's regulatory shadow," Singer tells Reason. asserted
Singer → remove → Reason
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support