Photo via Al Jazeera

NAZA: Why are old Gaza allegations causing new fury in Israel?

Read the original at Al Jazeera ↗
Cite

Cordall, S. S. (2026, September 19). NAZA: Why are old Gaza allegations causing new fury in Israel? Al Jazeera. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/9/19/naza-why-are-old-gaza-allegations-causing-new-fury-in-israel?traffic_source=rss

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Al Jazeera · collected 2026-09-19 · by Simon Speakman Cordall

Quick Summary

A new documentary called NAZA has caused significant controversy in Israel ahead of its October elections. Filmmakers Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor have faced severe backlash for allegations already reported earlier, such as the Israeli military using AI to target buildings, leading to civilian deaths. Culture Minister Miki Zohar and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have called for legal action against the filmmakers, including investigations by internal intelligence services and potential revocation of citizenship, while army chief Eyal Zamir dismissed the film as blood libel. The response highlights a unified stance among Israel’s political and media establishment on these issues despite previous awareness of the allegations.
Written by AI on 2026-09-19, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

At the 2026 Venice Film Festival, "NAZA", a documentary by Israeli directors Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor, won a special jury prize. The film, named after an Israeli military acronym for collateral damage, accuses Israel's army of intentionally targeting civilians in Gaza using AI-powered systems. It includes interviews with 24 anonymous Israeli military whistleblowers who describe systemic mass civilian killings during the war that began on October 7, 2023.

The documentary received a standing ovation and sparked intense backlash from Israeli officials. Culture Minister Miki Zohar threatened to strip Abraham and Szor of their citizenship for alleged treason, while Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called it "shocking incitement." The military chief Eyal Zamir ordered a legal review to investigate the sources involved in the documentary.

The film's controversial nature highlights deep divisions within Israel over the war's conduct and raises questions about freedom of expression versus national security concerns.

Written for “Gaza Documentary Controversy Israel” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 17 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Gaza Documentary Controversy Israel
Politics · 18 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 3% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this Hedges 1 of 14 claims Outlet record 60/100
Euronews
Hedges 4 of 14 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects related to the conflict in Gaza; Article A focuses on a UN request for access to investigate, while Article B discusses reactions to a documentary about past military actions.”
The Hindu
Hedges 3 of 12 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different aspects and contexts related to Gaza, with Article A focusing on current UN calls for investigation into recent discoveries of bodies in Gaza, while Article B discusses Israeli reactions to a documentary about past military actions.”
CBC News
Hedges 7 of 23 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of events related to Gaza; Article A focuses on UN rights chief Volker Türk's statement about uncovered remains raising concerns of war crimes, while Article B discusses a documentary and political reactions in Israel regarding military actions in Gaza.”
Al Jazeera
Hedges 4 of 19 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Article A discusses the UN's criticism of Israel for lack of respect for dead buried in Gaza rubble, while Article B talks about a new documentary causing political fury in Israel before elections. These are different events.”
Al Jazeera
Hedges 2 of 16 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different aspects: Article A reports Netanyahu's threat regarding a new law against defaming soldiers, specifically mentioning the NAZA documentary. Article B discusses the broader political and media reaction to the NAZA documentary's allegations.”
National Post
Hedges 4 of 25 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects related to media reporting and military actions during the Israel-Hamas conflict, but do not describe the same specific incident.”
ABC News (AU)
Hedges 2 of 29 claims Outlet record 68/100
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this Hedges 3 of 19 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Israel's political and military situation without describing the same specific incident.”
Deutsche Welle
Hedges 3 of 12 claims Outlet record 95/100
“The first article reports on a specific incident where the Israeli Culture Minister accuses filmmakers of treason, while the second article discusses broader political reactions to the documentary over time.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
30
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
3%
1 of 30 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
60/100
Al Jazeera's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
18
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-19 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Al Jazeera · 4506 article(s) · 2 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 2 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Simon Speakman Cordall
15 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 What is not in doubt, however, is the surge in turnout from Palestinian citizens of Israel, which has established Arab parties as a pivotal bloc in the parliament, potentially one able to determine which of the rival camps forms a government, if either is willing to work with them.
🔮 With Israel’s governing and opposition blocs failing to secure a majority in Israel’s election, and neither appearing ready to ally with Arab parties that could allow them to form a coalition, speculation is growing over the future shape of the government.
🔮 Recommended Stories list of 4 items- list 1 of 4The kingmakers who could determine Israel’s election - list 2 of 4In Israel election, Palestinian citizens weigh fear against disillusionment - list 3 of 4Israel preparing full lockdown of occupied West Bank after Hebron gunfight - list 4 of 4Ultra
🔮 Together, the two parties representing the Palestinian citizens of Israel, who make up about 20 percent of the population, are projected to win 13 seats.
2026-10-19 · assertive framing · The kingmakers who could determine Israel’s election
🔮 However, whether they offer meaningful change in substance as well as style, or which one of them might lead a future coalition, remains open to question.
2026-10-17 · assertive framing · The Israeli politicians seeking to replace Netanyahu
🔮 Dogged by corruption cases dating back to 2019, which could see him serve time in prison if convicted, he has been locked in a confrontation with the same legal establishment attempting to hold him to account.
🔮 Recommended Stories list of 4 items- list 1 of 4Trump launches midterms campaign blitz amid record low approval ratings - list 2 of 4New aircraft carrier, 10,000 US troops: Is the Iran war about to escalate? - list 3 of 4Trump vs Europe as US presses for release of emergency diesel stocks - list 4 of 4G7 nations to release oil and diesel stocks, will it bring down the prices?
2026-10-08 · assertive framing · How October 7 redrew the map of the Middle East
🔮 The Israeli public had been generally isolated from the consequences of the military’s violent actions in Gaza and the occupied West Bank, and Bar-Tal said many were shocked that Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu might have had prior intelligence about Hamas’s plans.
🔮 Netanyahu has attempted to shift the blame for not being alerted to the attack onto the former head of Israel’s internal security service, Ronen Bar, who announced on Monday that he would sue the prime minister, a longtime political nemesis, for defamation as a result.
🔮 Recommended Stories list of 4 items- list 1 of 4Israel’s Netanyahu set to address UN General Assembly - list 2 of 4Benjamin Netanyahu attacks Israel’s enemies and allies in UN speech - list 3 of 4NYC police arrest Susan Sarandon, other celebrities protesting Netanyahu - list 4 of
Also by Simon Speakman Cordall
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 15 articles by Simon Speakman Cordall →

Topics

4Israel Gaza Israel Israeli NAZA

Subjects

Israel GPE · 11× Israeli NORP · 8× Gaza GPE · 7× NAZA ORG · 5× 4Israel GPE · 2× Hamas ORG · 2× Israelis NORP · 2× Palestinian NORP · 2× Rachel Szor PERSON · 2× Yuval Abraham PERSON · 2×

Narrative

Culture Minister Miki Zohar reacted to the film’s premiere at the Venice Film Festival – where it received a 25-minute standing ovation – by calling for the directors to be stripped of their citizenship and to be investigated by the internal intelligence service for treason. Army chief Eyal Zamir has dismissed the film as being built on blood libel and ordered a legal probe to hunt down its military and intelligence sources.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-19
🔮 Israelis protest outside ‘NAZA’ filmmaker’s home - list 4 of 4Israel would rather not watch NAZA Other accusations against Israel, such as committing genocide, deliberately causing a famine, and unlawfully killing children, have also not received much attention in Israel.
2026-09-19 · Al Jazeera
NAZA: Why are old Gaza allegations causing new fury in Israel? · assertive framing

Claims (30 extracted, 1 hedged)

But the furious response to a new documentary about the military’s actions in the genocidal war on Gaza has revealed an issue that much of Israel’s political and media establishment appears united on. asserted
much → reveal → establishment
Few of the central allegations in NAZA, made by Israeli filmmakers Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor, are new. asserted
Few → make → filmmakers
Reports that the Israeli military was relying on artificial intelligence systems to generate targets in Gaza, often killing the inhabitants of entire buildings to kill just one individual identified by the system, were reported in April 2024. asserted
military → rely → April
Recommended Stories list of 4 items- list 1 of 4Israel weaponises AI for West Bank demolitions - list 2 of 4Netanyahu threatens to revoke Israeli citizenship of NAZA filmmakers - list 3 of 4Jerusalem Daily: asserted
4Netanyahu → weaponise → filmmakers
Israelis protest outside ‘NAZA’ filmmaker’s home - list 4 of 4Israel would rather not watch NAZA Other accusations against Israel, such as committing genocide, deliberately causing a famine, and unlawfully killing children, have also not received much attention in Israel. asserted
accusations → protest → Israel
In contrast, NAZA has unleashed a litany of abuse from across Israel, and brought the allegations to the centre of Israel’s political debate. asserted
NAZA → unleash → debate
Culture Minister Miki Zohar reacted to the film’s premiere at the Venice Film Festival – where it received a 25-minute standing ovation – by calling for the directors to be stripped of their citizenship and to be investigated by the internal intelligence service for treason. Army chief Eyal Zamir has dismissed the film as being built on blood libel and ordered a legal probe to hunt down its military and intelligence sources. asserted
Zamir → react → sources
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also cited the film when advancing legislation to revoke citizenship from anyone deemed to be smearing the country’s soldiers, while in the coastal city of Ashdod, graffiti branding the directors “traitors” has appeared on the walls. asserted
graffiti → cite → walls
“You can’t really understand the extent of the madness from outside of the country,” Orly Noy, an editor at Local Call, which first carried many of the accusations contained in the film, said. asserted
which → understand → film
“They’re attacking the friends and families of [the filmmakers] Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor. asserted
They → attack → filmmakers
They’re talking about revoking their citizenship. asserted
They → talk → citizenship
They’re asking the Shin Bet to investigate them – for making a film, and it isn’t just the politicians. asserted
it → ask → film
Journalists, who you might expect to show some kind of solidarity with them, are competing to attack them. uncertain
you → expect → them
It’s scary.” asserted
It → ’ → ?
In late 2025, the Committee to Protect Journalists reported escalating censorship and harassment in Israel, with Israeli journalists telling the organisation that the media’s approach had become “part of the war effort” and, by extension, significantly shaped Israeli view of their war on Gaza. asserted
approach → report → Gaza
In October 2025, a study by the Israeli think tank Molad found that only 3 percent of Channel 12’s coverage of the first six months of the war mentioned Gaza’s humanitarian crisis. asserted
percent → find → crisis
Of 206 war-related images and video clips broadcast by the network, Israel’s most-watched channel, only two showed Palestinian civilian casualties. asserted
two → relate → casualties
Nevertheless, before the film’s release, polls found that most Israelis believed the coverage they were receiving of the military’s conduct in Gaza was balanced. asserted
they → find → Gaza
“I guess it was because the mainstream media outlets in Israel did not investigate the conduct of the army during the war in Gaza, and hardly covered the war from the Palestinian point of view,” Anat Saragusti, the Israeli jurist and journalist responsible for press freedom at the Union of Journalists in Israel, said of the shock that had accompanied the release of the film. asserted
that → guess → film
“[The Israeli media] hardly reported on the human toll and the scale of the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.” asserted
media → report → Gaza
Compounding the gap, Saragusti said, was a deep-seated national narrative: that the war had been imposed on Israel, that Hamas had carried out a massacre on October 7, 2023, and that Hamas’s use of civilians as human shields made mass casualties in Gaza all but unavoidable. asserted
casualties → compound → Gaza
Palestinian deaths, in this telling, were framed less as the product of Israeli conduct than as collateral damage forced on Israel by its enemy’s tactics, she said. asserted
she → frame → tactics
“Even journalists that usually support the anti-Netanyahu bloc have criticised the filmmakers,” Israeli political sociologist Daniel Bar-Tal said. asserted
Tal → support → filmmakers
“Israeli Jews deny the genocide,” he continued, “Even all the opposition parties joined the vicious criticism of the filmmakers.” asserted
parties → deny → filmmakers
The language used against the filmmakers has been echoed by some of Netanyahu’s most prominent political rivals. asserted
language → use → rivals
On Monday, former military chief and one of Netanyahu’s principal rivals Gadi Eisenkot denounced the film for “moral blindness, a detachment from reality, and harm to the State of Israel in a difficult hour”. asserted
Eisenkot → denounce → hour
Former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett, who is also running in October’s election, called the film a “horrific blood libel against our sons and daughters”. “Everything gets heightened the closer to the election we get,” Noy said. asserted
Noy → run → election
“But I think only now, for those of us who live here, is the extent of the fascism becoming clear. asserted
extent → think → fascism
Journalists, politicians and the media are forming some kind of incitement machine.” asserted
Journalists → form → machine
“I’ve had anxieties over where Israel had been going for a long time,” she said, “but right now I’m genuinely worried for my friends and colleagues.” asserted
I → have → friends
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support