There’s a level of irony in the deep admiration so many Alberta separatists harbour for our neighbour to the south.
asserted
separatists → ’ → south
After all, there is no legal process for an American state to separate from the U.S. and, thus, such a movement could not exist there.
uncertain
movement → be → U.S.
Of course, the United States underwent a far messier and bloodier process before concluding that divorce shall forever be off the table.
asserted
divorce → undergo → table
In our 159 years as a nation, we’ve never had any kind of a breakup.
asserted
we → have → breakup
And while there is indeed a legal pathway that exists for a Canadian province to leave, there is no precedent.
asserted
province → be → ?
That doesn’t and shouldn’t leave us flying blind into a potential catastrophe.
asserted
That → do → catastrophe
It’s reasonable to assume that a dismantling of Confederation would be costly, convoluted, and potentially ugly.
asserted
dismantling → ’ → Confederation
The rosy and optimistic forecasts from separatists that executing their plan would be clean, easy, and cheap have always seemed like wishful thinking detached from reality.
But this is not just a warning for Alberta, and it’s not just Alberta that could suffer from a breakup.
uncertain
that → execute → breakup
This should be a wake-up call for the rest of Canada, too.
asserted
This → wake → Canada
Despite some alarming and stark conclusions, it’s actually a rather thorough and balanced report.
asserted
it → ’ → conclusions
On top of that, the report was overseen and analyzed by an expert advisory panel, chaired by noted economist Jack Mintz.
asserted
report → oversee → Mintz
As both the report and the panel assessment conclude: separation would entail very real and very significant short-term costs, even under a best-case scenario.
asserted
separation → conclude → scenario
But both conclusions are also in agreement on this point: the fallout would extend well beyond Alberta’s borders, as such a rupture would cause tremendous harm to Canada’s economy, too.
asserted
rupture → extend → economy
The School of Public Policy report is focused on two scenarios: one — the “smooth” option — would entail a quicker and more favourable accommodation of Alberta’s secession.
asserted
one → focus → secession
The other — the “difficult” option — entails a more drawn-out, complicated process.
asserted
other → entail → process
Between those two scenarios, the cost of leaving one country and establishing another ranges from $50 billion to $170 billion, just in the first five years, and that’s just the fiscal impact.
asserted
that → leave → years
The economic impact of that upheaval would come on top of that.
asserted
impact → come → that
There’s an obvious up front cost for any subnational government promoting itself to an independent state, and taking over those federal responsibilities and institutions.
asserted
government → ’ → responsibilities
So even under a best-case scenario, which the report doesn’t shy away from presenting, there is a substantial cost in the short term.
asserted
report → shy → term
While there could be a potential longer-term upside, it remains highly uncertain.
uncertain
it → remain → ?
As these reports note, many of those “major factors” that will shape the ultimate outcome “are not fully controllable by Alberta.”
asserted
that → note → Alberta
The report forecasts that in those first five years, there could be a GDP contraction of 10 per cent, a comparable percentage of employment loss, a $5000 drop in wages, and a massive debt of well over $400-billion.
uncertain
report → forecast → billion
Looking longer term, it’s even uglier, as Alberta’s economy, wages, and workforce shrink even further.
asserted
economy → look → ?
Importantly, though, the rest of Canada does not emerge unscathed from Alberta’s departure
As the panel report notes, such a national disruption would come at the time when trade and geopolitical uncertainty are already weighing heavily on Canada’s economy.
asserted
trade → emerge → economy
Politically, there would be one province (B.C.) cut off from the rest of the country, and another province (Quebec) where separation could become far more likely.
Then there’s the American factor.
uncertain
separation → cut → country
As the report points out, separation would “make Alberta more dependent on shipping oil through the U.S.”
asserted
Alberta → point → U.S.
The Americans could be co-operative, or they “might try to take advantage of Alberta’s lack of other options.”
uncertain
they → try → options
Based on current trends, the latter seems far more likely.
asserted
latter → base → trends
In short, we’re facing a true lose-lose scenario.
asserted
we → face → scenario
Now’s an ideal time to come to grips with that.
asserted
time → ’ → that
It’s not just for Albertans to face the risks and uncertainty of breaking away; it’s also the rest of Canada that needs to understand the benefit of keeping Alberta within Confederation.
asserted
that → ’ → Confederation
As the panel report notes, this will hopefully result in “more effective and accommodating responses” to Alberta’s concerns and aspirations.
asserted
this → note → concerns
Whether it’s Alberta or any other province, separation is unavoidably “a complicated, lengthy and contentious exercise.”
asserted
separation → ’ → ?
It’s also clearly a risky gamble.
asserted
It → ’ → ?
That doesn’t mean forever closing the door on any potential future provincial exit, nor should it mean complacency in the idea that we’re simply and always better off together.
asserted
we → mean → idea
We have something worth preserving, but that’s not always as apparent as it should be.
asserted
it → have → something
Here’s our wake-up call to fix that.
asserted
call → ’ → that
The Aporia
