Photo via Reason

Today in Supreme Court History: September 19, 1907

Read the original at Reason ↗
Cite

Blackman, J. (2026, September 19). Today in Supreme Court History: September 19, 1907. Reason. https://reason.com/volokh/2026/09/19/today-in-supreme-court-history-september-19-1907-7/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Reason · collected 2026-09-19 · by Josh Blackman

Quick Summary

No summary of this article yet; the story summary below covers the event.

AI analysis

Story summary

On September 19, 1907, the *Reason Magazine* highlighted an event in Supreme Court history through an excerpt from *The Volokh Conspiracy*, focusing on legal scholarship and commentary rather than a specific case or ruling. The piece did not detail any particular happenings but invited readers to celebrate independence by subscribing to Reason magazine for reliable news and analysis, often leaning libertarian while maintaining contrarian views within the legal community. No concrete events or statistics from that day in Supreme Court history were provided beyond noting its significance in historical context.

Written for “Supreme Court History” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Supreme Court History
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges an unknown share of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Bulwark
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 12 claims
“The articles discuss different topics and timeframes, with Article A focusing on a contemporary legal debate involving Samuel Alito's dissent in a mail-ballot ruling, while Article B appears to be about historical Supreme Court events from 1907.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
0
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
no claims
nothing to measure
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
67/100
Reason's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
none derived
Analyzed 2026-09-25 · source text last changed 2026-09-25 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Reason · 1095 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Josh Blackman
91 article(s) here · 0 carrying a prediction
🔮 And Kagan spared California the fate that befell Missouri, which had to file a pointless brief that no one would read.
🔮 I thought it might be worthwhile to dig into the numbers a bit more.
🔮 Today the law firm of Weil Gotshal announced that it would wind down.
2026-10-28 · assertive framing · Farewell to Weil
🔮 And her unwillingness to participate in any disciplinary proceedings suggests something is amiss.
🔮 Longtime readers will recall that I took mileage runs to Singapore, Hong Kong, and Sydney to make status at the end of the year.
2026-10-28 · assertive framing · 1,000,000 Miles on United
🔮 Let's hope that people across the media industry will take Josh Blackman's criticism to heart.
2026-10-27 · assertive framing · The Wall Street Journal Praises The Old Gray Lady
🔮 New from Reason: a look into what Javier Milei has accomplished and what it will take to make the most of Argentina’s window for real change.
2026-10-26 · assertive framing · Today in Supreme Court History: October 26, 1774
🔮 ] There have been many news reports suggesting that the United States Department of Justice may pursue denaturalization proceedings against Representative Ilhan Omar.
🔮 Nevertheless, the next two decades would vastly enlarge the president's powers as Congress' authority over the executive branch would be greatly diminished.
🔮 Justice Sotomayor, Justice Gorsuch, Justice Barrett, and Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Also by Josh Blackman
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 91 articles by Josh Blackman →

Topics

No topics tagged.

Subjects

No subjects extracted.

Narrative

No narrative derived. That requires at least one asserted claim.

Claims (0 extracted, 0 hedged)

No claims extracted from this article.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support