Photo via Washington Examiner

Want to cut $4 billion in defense spending? Give troops Zyns and vapes

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Ruth, A. (2026, September 19). Want to cut $4 billion in defense spending? Give troops Zyns and vapes. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/op-eds/4730708/ndaa-section-707-military-smoking-defense-spending/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-09-19 · by Andrea Ruth

Quick Summary

The article discusses a provision in the House-passed defense authorization bill that could help reduce military healthcare costs related to smoking. Section 707 allows the Department of Defense to establish a pilot program offering service members who smoke at least one tobacco product per week access to various nicotine cessation tools, including e-cigarettes and nicotine pouches. This initiative aims to cut preventable healthcare expenses for the military, estimated at up to $4 billion annually, or roughly 0.5% of the Pentagon’s budget. The article highlights how this approach could address higher smoking rates among active-duty personnel compared to civilians, potentially improving health outcomes while reducing costs.
Written by AI on 2026-09-19, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

With the national debt reaching $40 trillion, there is growing pressure on the federal government to cut spending. A potential area for savings, highlighted in the House-passed defense authorization bill, involves a pilot program aimed at reducing military smoking rates. Section 707 of the fiscal 2027 National Defense Authorization Act would allow the Department of Defense to test various nicotine replacement methods like e-cigarettes and nicotine pouches among service members who smoke regularly. This initiative could save an estimated $4 billion over ten years by reducing healthcare costs related to smoking. However, it remains uncertain whether either political party will actually implement such cuts given their historical reluctance to make significant spending reductions.

Written for “Military Spending Cuts” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Military Spending Cuts
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 15% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Fox News
Hedges 4 of 23 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of federal spending and fiscal policy without describing the same specific incident.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
41
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
15%
6 of 41 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
70/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-19 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 3988 article(s) · 7 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 7 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Andrea Ruth
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Knowing Washington, it’s unlikely either party will agree to big cuts.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Democrats House Pentagon Republicans Washington

Subjects

Pentagon ORG · 3× Cochrane GPE · 2× Army ORG · 1× Congress ORG · 1× Democrats NORP · 1× House ORG · 1× Patricia Horoho PERSON · 1× Republicans NORP · 1× Washington GPE · 1× the Department of War ORG · 1×

Narrative

Rodu describes the War Department’s historical approach to lower-risk tobacco and nicotine products as “prohibition-oriented” and has documented his attempts to challenge military messaging about their relative risks going back nearly a decade.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-19
🔮 Knowing Washington, it’s unlikely either party will agree to big cuts.
2026-09-19 · Washington Examiner
Want to cut $4 billion in defense spending? Give troops Zyns and vapes · assertive framing

Claims (41 extracted, 6 hedged)

With the national debt hitting $40 trillion, pressure is building for the federal government to identify spending cuts. asserted
government → hit → cuts
In the coming weeks, we can expect to hear familiar refrains: asserted
we → come → refrains
Republicans need to agree to slash defense and farm-country spending; Democrats need to agree to slash government-funded healthcare and welfare spending. asserted
Democrats → need → spending
Knowing Washington, it’s unlikely either party will agree to big cuts. asserted
party → know → cuts
So the best hope of budget restraint will be trimming here and there that cumulatively add up to something significant. asserted
that → trim → something
Buried in the House-passed defense authorization bill is a smart and fairly simple idea that could help: give the military the tools needed to test more ways to help service members quit smoking. uncertain
members → bury → smoking
Section 707 of the fiscal 2027 National Defense Authorization Act would allow the war secretary to establish a one-year pilot program for active-duty service members who smoke at least one combustible tobacco product per week. asserted
who → allow → week
Participants could choose among counseling, nicotine gum, nicotine patches, electronic cigarettes, nicotine pouches, and heat-not-burn products. uncertain
Participants → choose → counseling
The secretary “may” establish the program. uncertain
secretary → establish → program
Congress isn’t ordering the Pentagon to hand out vapes or nicotine pouches. asserted
Congress → order → vapes
It’s giving the Department of War the authority to test them alongside existing cessation tools and report back on what works. asserted
what → give → tools
This could have important financial upsides. uncertain
This → have → upsides
In a 2015 congressional hearing, Lt. Gen. Patricia Horoho, then-surgeon general of the Army, testified that the War Department could be sustaining $4.5 billion or more in preventable healthcare costs as a result of smoking. uncertain
Department → testify → smoking
That’s about 0.5% of the Pentagon’s fiscal 2026 budget request, so it’s not chump change. asserted
it → ’ → request
It’s also money being spent to treat avoidable human suffering sustained by America’s heroes: mouth and lung cancer, heart disease, stroke, emphysema, asthma, and chronic bronchitis. asserted
It → ’ → heroes
A Defense Health Agency analysis found that 18.4% of active-duty service members reported smoking cigarettes in the 2018 Health Related Behaviors Survey, compared with 13.7% of the general U.S. population. asserted
% → find → population
Among those ages 17 to 24, 23.1% reported smoking cigarettes, compared with 7.8% of similarly aged civilians. asserted
% → report → civilians
That means our service members are at far greater risk than the rest of us from smoking-related illnesses. asserted
members → mean → illnesses
“The problem is quitting is hard,” Dr. Ray Niaura, a tobacco-control researcher at New York University, told me. asserted
Niaura → tell → me
“There’s no magic bullet, and we’re always looking for better ways to help people along.” asserted
we → ’ → people
Increasingly, the evidence shows some of those alternatives may work better. uncertain
some → show → alternatives
An updated Cochrane review released this month examined 80 studies involving nearly 30,000 smokers. asserted
review → update → smokers
Researchers found high-certainty evidence that nicotine e-cigarettes increased quit rates compared with traditional nicotine replacement therapy, including patches and gum — and by 59%, not some piddly percentage. asserted
cigarettes → find → %
Last year, Rutgers University found that nicotine pouches, a newer product that the Food and Drug Administration under Presidents Joe Biden and Donald Trump has found less harmful than smoking, help smokers quit. asserted
smokers → find → smoking
Studies at Yale and NYU have shown the same. asserted
Studies → show → same
Dr. Brad Rodu, a professor of medicine at the University of Louisville who has studied tobacco harm reduction for decades, pointed me to the new Cochrane findings when I asked him about the Pentagon proposal. asserted
I → study → proposal
“The evidence keeps building for e-cigarettes,” Rodu said. asserted
Rodu → build → cigarettes
Niaura said, “Because pouches are fairly popular, it kind of makes sense to try them out and see what happens.” asserted
what → say → them
But the FDA says cigarettes are at the most harmful end of what the agency calls a continuum of risk because they burn tobacco. asserted
they → say → tobacco
Cigarette smoke exposes users to thousands of chemicals that cause the serious diseases associated with smoking. asserted
that → expose → smoking
Noncombustible products generally carry lower health risks. asserted
products → carry → risks
That doesn’t make e-cigarettes — or pouches — harmless. asserted
cigarettes → make → ?
But Section 707 is aimed specifically at active-duty service members who already smoke. asserted
who → aim → members
Rodu describes the War Department’s historical approach to lower-risk tobacco and nicotine products as “prohibition-oriented” and has documented his attempts to challenge military messaging about their relative risks going back nearly a decade. asserted
Rodu → describe → risks
He calls the proposed pilot “a huge step in the right direction for DoD.” asserted
He → call → DoD.
Unfortunately, Section 707 isn’t guaranteed to survive. asserted
Section → guarantee → ?
The House passed H.R. 8800 in July, but the Senate Armed Services Committee’s version contains no comparable provision. asserted
version → pass → provision
The language will have to be in place before the Pentagon can begin testing. asserted
Pentagon → have → place
With luck, the Senate will see reason here. asserted
Senate → see → reason
America’s service members and our own public finances are counting on it. asserted
members → count → it
…and 1 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support