Plaintiff Joseph Soliz, who is proceeding pro se, was at all times relevant to this case a student at St. Philip's College, an individual college within the Alamo Community Colleges District ("ACCD") system.
asserted
who → proceed → system
He was enrolled in a class taught by Roy Ruiz, named as a defendant here.
asserted
He → enrol → defendant
On January 17, 2024, Soliz and Ruiz got into a dispute during class.
asserted
Soliz → get → class
Soliz was working on a lab exercise regarding electrical circuits.
asserted
Soliz → work → circuits
His digital multimeter alarmed at least once.
asserted
multimeter → alarm → ?
Ruiz came over and offered to assist him, and Soliz told him that he would "get it figured out."
asserted
it → come → him
Ruiz then explained multiple times to Soliz that he was not following directions.
asserted
he → explain → directions
Soliz insisted that he was doing it his own way and asked Ruiz not to "micromanage" him.
asserted
he → insist → him
Ruiz took away his lab papers, and Soliz took them back, refusing to relinquish them.
asserted
Soliz → take → them
Ruiz threatened to summon campus police and instead summoned Elizabeth Leon, a St. Philip's staff member.
asserted
Ruiz → threaten → Leon
Ms. Leon attempted to resolve the issue with Soliz, but Soliz did not cooperate and "told [her] the conversation was over."
asserted
conversation → attempt → her
The next morning, Ruiz sent an email to Soliz asking him not to attend class that day.
asserted
Ruiz → send → class
The email explained that, in Ruiz's view, Soliz had been unduly combative and had misused equipment, which Ruiz believed posed a safety risk, and that Soliz had refused to follow instructions and disrupted the class.
asserted
Soliz → explain → class
Soliz attended class anyway.
asserted
Soliz → attend → class
Ruiz approached Soliz and said that if he refused to leave, Ruiz would call campus police.
asserted
Ruiz → approach → police
Soliz refused, and Ruiz followed through on his statement.
asserted
Ruiz → refuse → statement
Campus police arrived and took Soliz with them to "temporary campus police offices."
asserted
police → arrive → offices
They showed Soliz the email that Ruiz had sent that morning, establishing the grounds for his removal from class.
asserted
Ruiz → show → class
Campus administrators came by and were discussing the matter outside the office.
asserted
administrators → come → office
Soliz, "hearing discussion about [him], left the campus police temporary offices and entered the hallway."
asserted
Soliz → hear → hallway
Soliz briefly talked over the incident with school administrators, who planned to scheduled him for a student conduct meeting to be held on Monday, January 22, 2024.
asserted
who → talk → Monday
They then sent Soliz a notification for a Zoom meeting to take place on January 19, 2024.
asserted
They → send → January
Soliz states he did not attend the meeting because it was too short notice, and because he was unable "to engage counsel or be able to research or craft a defense."
asserted
he → state → defense
As a result of the classroom dispute, Soliz states, he "was barred from both of Roy's class[es] he was enrolled in until he had additional safety instruction."
asserted
he → state → instruction
Soliz sued on various theories, and the court rejected them all, adopting Magistrate Judge Richard Farrer's report and recommendation.
asserted
court → sue → report
Here's the analysis of the First Amendment claim (for more on the Fourth Amendment and Due Process Clause claims, see the opinion) from the Magistrate Judge:
uncertain
analysis → see → Judge
Soliz does not identify a constitutionally protected activity for purposes of his First Amendment retaliation claim.
uncertain
Soliz → identify → claim
He states only that he was engaged in "protected academic inquiry," but that is a legal conclusion, and his earlier-pleaded facts make clear he is complaining about how an instructor handled his failure to follow directions and enforce basic classroom rules.
asserted
instructor → state → rules
His quibbles about the procedures in a lab assignment are not protected speech, and his cited cases largely regard the raising of viewpoints and intellectual disagreement in a school context.
asserted
cases → protect → context
Nowhere else in Soliz's pleadings does he identify any particular statement or protected speech at issue.
asserted
he → identify → issue
He perhaps comes closest when he makes reference to his "objection to the use of religious symbols during class instruction" at some prior, unspecified time, but the pleadings make clear that the conduct complained of in the instant case is based on the immediate dispute between Soliz and Ruiz over disruptions of class and failure to follow instructions, and not in retaliation for these objections.
asserted
based → come → objections
Thus, Ruiz's actions were clearly not substantially motivated by this (vaguely described) earlier objection, or any other statement or activity.
asserted
actions → motivate → objection
Any First Amendment retaliation claim that could be attempted against the police-officer defendants or other government actors would fail for the same reasons.
uncertain
that → attempt → reasons
Ultimately, the First Amendment retaliation claim is vague and conclusory as pleaded and fails as a matter of law.
uncertain
claim → plead → law
Moreover, Soliz's pleaded facts establish that his dispute with Ruiz disrupted class.
asserted
dispute → plead → class
It is well settled that "conduct by the student, in class or out of it, which for any reason—whether it stems from time, place, or type of behavior—materially disrupts classwork or involves substantial disorder or invasion of the rights of others is, of course, not immunized by the constitutional guarantee of freedom of speech."
asserted
it → settle → speech
Soliz's pleaded facts deprive him of any claim on First Amendment grounds for this reason as well.
uncertain
facts → plead → reason
See Dkt. No. 1-2 at 28 ("The Office of Student Conduct received four (4) [reports] and one Police Report between January 17-18, 2024.
asserted
Office → see → January
Every report alleges disruptive behavior, safety hazard concerns, among other possible violations of the [ACCD] Student Code of Conduct….").
asserted
report → allege → Conduct
Soliz's own pleaded facts demonstrate that he repeatedly refused to follow Ruiz's instructions during a lab assignment involving electric circuity.
asserted
he → plead → circuity
…and 6 more, not listed.
The Aporia