Photo via New York Post

California colleges blocked from punishing students for ‘misgendering’ classmates under policy

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Andrews, E. (2026, September 19). California colleges blocked from punishing students for ‘misgendering’ classmates under policy. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/09/19/us-news/judge-blocks-uc-from-punishing-students-for-transgender-pronoun-name-use/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-09-19 · by Erica Andrews

Quick Summary

A federal judge has issued a temporary injunction preventing the University of California system from enforcing parts of its transgender harassment policy that punish students for using pronouns corresponding with a person’s sex assigned at birth rather than their gender identity. The ruling protects members of Defending Education, a conservative group, while they challenge the university's policies in court. Judge Fred W. Slaughter found that UC’s policy likely violates the First Amendment by compelling speech and being viewpoint-based. This decision affects students, faculty, staff, and third parties within the UC system who face potential disciplinary actions for alleged violations of the gender identity pronoun guidelines.
Written by AI on 2026-09-19, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On Tuesday, US District Judge Fred W. Slaughter issued a preliminary injunction against the University of California (UC), preventing it from enforcing parts of its transgender harassment policy. The policy in question prohibits the "intentional or repeated use of a name or pronoun inconsistent with an individual's gender identity." The judge ruled that members of Defending Education, a conservative education group, are likely to succeed on their claim that UC’s policy violates the First Amendment by compelling speech and being viewpoint-based. The injunction specifically protects Defending Education from punishment for using names or pronouns corresponding with a person's sex assigned at birth rather than their gender identity in a commonplace manner. The ruling only applies until the lawsuit moves forward but marks a significant legal challenge to UC’s policy on transgender rights, which impacts students, faculty, staff, and certain third parties within the university system.

Written for “UC Policy On Misgendering” on 2026-11-04, grounded in this article and the 1 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 UC Policy On Misgendering
Education · 2 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 23% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
22
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
23%
5 of 22 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
2
Education
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-19 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 16794 article(s) · 36 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 36 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Erica Andrews
42 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Authorities have not yet released the suspect’s identity or details about the charges they may face.
🔮 Southern California’s Halloween festivities could turn into a soggy mess as a powerful storm threatens to drench trick-or-treaters, unleash thunderstorms and deliver the region’s first rainy Oct. 31 in years.
🔮 “We will find all persons who are responsible in any way for this tragedy and hold every one of them accountable for this despicable conduct.”
🔮 Authorities in those areas issued alternative emergency numbers and urged residents not to make unnecessary test calls that could further overwhelm dispatchers.
🔮 Hernan’s older brother, Eliseo Martinez, said their mother managed to pull Vicky away from the speeding car but could not save Hernan.
🔮 A movie theater worker was beaten by a furious woman and her boyfriend after she was allegedly told she couldn’t bring four cans of outside drinks into a Los Angeles-area cinema — sparking a wild brawl caught on camera.
🔮 Police have released a description of the man in hopes that someone will recognize him and help authorities put a name to the face.
🔮 According to Briggs, McKinsey had once enlisted a “hit-man” to “get rid of” Chen — a claim that could shed new light on the bitter family conflict preceding the deadly encounter.
🔮 The sheriff’s office told The Post the National Park Service was leading the search and would be responsible for providing any updates.
🔮 In a blistering letter sent Friday, the Justice Department warned that election workers who knowingly process ballots from people identified by federal authorities as noncitizens could find themselves facing a federal criminal investigation.
Also by Erica Andrews
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 42 articles by Erica Andrews →

Topics

Defending Education Sexual Violence and Sexual Harassment the First Amendment the Los Angeles Times the University of California

Subjects

Defending Education ORG · 5× Slaughter PERSON · 2× California GPE · 1× Fred W. Slaughter PERSON · 1× Neily PERSON · 1× Nicole Neily PERSON · 1× UC Irvine ORG · 1× UCLA ORG · 1× the Los Angeles Times ORG · 1× the University of California ORG · 1×

Narrative

US District Judge Fred W. Slaughter issued a preliminary injunction preventing UC from punishing members of Defending Education for using, “in a commonplace way,” names or pronouns corresponding with a transgender person’s sex assigned at birth rather than their gender identity, per the Los Angeles Times.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-19
🔮 At the center of the legal showdown is a policy applying to students, faculty, staff and certain third parties that identifies the “intentional or repeated use of a name or pronoun inconsistent with the individual’s gender identity” as conduct that may constitute harassment.

Claims (22 extracted, 5 hedged)

A federal judge has temporarily blocked the University of California from enforcing parts of its transgender harassment policy against members of a conservative education group, finding they are likely to succeed on claims that the rules violate the First Amendment. uncertain
rules → block → Amendment
US District Judge Fred W. Slaughter issued a preliminary injunction preventing UC from punishing members of Defending Education for using, “in a commonplace way,” names or pronouns corresponding with a transgender person’s sex assigned at birth rather than their gender identity, per the Los Angeles Times. asserted
Slaughter → issue → Times
The ruling does not completely strike down UC’s Sexual Violence and Sexual Harassment Policy and only protects members of Defending Education while the group’s lawsuit against the university system moves forward. asserted
lawsuit → strike → system
But Slaughter found the organization was likely to prevail on its First Amendment challenge, writing that UC’s policy “compels speech and is viewpoint-based,” according to the outlet. uncertain
policy → find → outlet
At the center of the legal showdown is a policy applying to students, faculty, staff and certain third parties that identifies the “intentional or repeated use of a name or pronoun inconsistent with the individual’s gender identity” as conduct that may constitute harassment. uncertain
that → apply → harassment
Defending Education sued UC colleges in June, arguing the policy is so broad that students fear punishment simply for expressing their beliefs about biological sex and gender identity. asserted
students → sue → sex
The group’s complaint also alleges the rules can extend beyond conversations on campus to online communications and text messages, while university employees are required to report suspected violations. asserted
employees → allege → violations
Defending Education further argued violations can carry serious consequences under UC disciplinary rules, potentially including suspension or expulsion, restrictions from campus activities or locations and in some circumstances, revocation of academic degrees. asserted
violations → argue → degrees
“These students want to engage in speech covered by the SVSH Policy, but they credibly fear that the expression of their deeply held views will lead to punishment,” the group argued in its lawsuit. asserted
group → want → lawsuit
Four student members submitted declarations supporting the challenge, although they are not individually plaintiffs. asserted
they → submit → challenge
One UCLA senior claimed the policy forced her to “self censor” because using pronouns inconsistent with a person’s sex assigned at birth would conflict with her religious beliefs, according to the complaint. uncertain
using → claim → complaint
A UC Irvine student identified as “Student D” described encountering the issue in everyday campus life. asserted
student → identify → life
“I am often in classes or small groups with people who identify as transgender and have to work hard to avoid pronouns or names in those situations,” the student said in a declaration quoted in the group’s court filing. asserted
student → identify → filing
Defending Education President Nicole Neily celebrated the injunction as a blow against what she called a “coercive speech policy.” asserted
she → celebrate → what
“It is unconstitutional for public universities to compel student speech, and we will continue to defend this principle in California and other schools across the country as needed,” Neily told the LA Times. asserted
Neily → compel → Times
UC maintains that the policy is aimed at stopping discrimination and harassment, not policing constitutionally protected speech. asserted
policy → maintain → speech
University spokesperson Rachel Zaentz said the rules are “designed to protect members of the university community from discrimination and harassment, not to regulate protected speech. asserted
rules → say → speech
” “While we disagree with the court’s ruling, UC will always seek to foster a welcoming environment that protects both freedom of expression and the fundamental rights of all members of our community,” Zaentz said in a statement to the outlet. asserted
Zaentz → disagree → outlet
The injunction also does not prevent UC from enforcing its rules against abusive gender-based harassment. asserted
injunction → prevent → harassment
Slaughter cited the hypothetical example of a bully calling a boy “little princess” or “baby girl” as conduct the university could potentially regulate. uncertain
university → cite → conduct
The ruling is preliminary and does not finally decide whether UC’s policy is unconstitutional. asserted
policy → decide → ?
The underlying federal lawsuit will continue. asserted
lawsuit → underlie → ?
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support