Photo via The Guardian

US environment agency let Bayer pick regulations for destructive weedkiller, documents show

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Cite

Perkins, T. (2026, September 20). US environment agency let Bayer pick regulations for destructive weedkiller, documents show. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/sep/20/epa-bayer-regulation-pesticide-dicamba

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Guardian · collected 2026-09-20 · by Tom Perkins

Quick Summary

Internal documents reveal that the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) allowed Bayer to choose specific regulations for dicamba, a controversial weedkiller linked to cancer and extensive crop damage. The EPA presented Bayer with several options ranging from more protective measures to less restrictive ones; Bayer selected the least protective option in one case and an intermediate level of protection in another. Critics argue this process crosses ethical lines, allowing industry to effectively regulate itself. Nathan Donley from the Center for Biological Diversity describes it as letting Bayer "choose its preferred measures," akin to ordering dinner à la carte.
Written by AI on 2026-09-20, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) allowed Bayer, a pesticide company, to choose regulatory options for dicamba, a weedkiller linked to cancer. Documents released in ongoing litigation show that the EPA asked Bayer which restrictions it wanted regarding dicamba's volatility and runoff. Bayer selected less protective measures from available options. Dicamba is known for drifting into neighboring fields and destroying vegetation and crops, leading courts to order its removal twice due to drift issues. Critics like Kelly Ryerson of the "make America healthy again" (Maha) movement argue that this reveals the EPA's capture by pesticide companies. Eight days after initial discussions, a Bayer representative emailed the EPA to proceed with their chosen regulatory options.

Written for “Bayer Weedkiller Regulations Controversy” on 2026-11-05, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Bayer Weedkiller Regulations Controversy
Economy/Business · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
34
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
3%
1 of 34 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
The Guardian's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Economy/Business
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-20 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Guardian · 2073 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Tom Perkins
8 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 On Tuesday, voters statewide will consider a nation-leading ban on political donations by the state’s deeply unpopular regulated utilities.
🔮 He said the environmental groups screen for potential county or industry employees, and greet people who they do not know, so they would have noticed Vital’s name had it been displayed.
🔮 The defense department has now granted SpaceX access to its most precise data on potential collisions among satellites and other space objects, which will give Musk’s companies an advantage over competition that offers a similar service.
🔮 It now reads: “Quantities of Pfoa may be produced, imported, and used by companies …
🔮 The overall project would have released enough pollution to trigger a major review.
🔮 The study identified 16 pesticides that are not listed under Prop 65, and the authors say adding these chemicals could discourage companies from using them.
🔮 “[Companies] are permitted to submit mitigation ideas that preserve their product’s utility, and EPA also will independently develop its own proposed mitigations.
🔮 “There is some amount of urgency here, and my hope is that this might accelerate the conversations that the government might have about providing [Pfas health monitoring] to all veterans,” said Christian Hoover , a study co-author and a pre-doctoral fellow in epidemiology at Brown’s School of Public Health.
Also by Tom Perkins
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 8 articles by Tom Perkins →

Topics

Bayer Dicamba EPA Non-Hodgkin lymphoma the Center for Biological Diversity

Subjects

EPA ORG · 16× Bayer ORG · 11× the Center for Biological Diversity ORG · 2× Chili’s ORG · 1× Donley PERSON · 1× Guardian ORG · 1× Kyle Kunkler PERSON · 1× Nathan Donley PERSON · 1× Non-Hodgkin lymphoma ORG · 1× the Center for Food Safety ORG · 1×

Narrative

The revelations drew condemnation from “make America healthy again” (Maha) advocate Kelly Ryerson, who said: “It is now undeniable that the EPA remains fully captured by a crooked collection of pesticide company players who so enthusiastically ignore the substantial losses of farmers and the federal courts who mandated a halt to dicamba use.” Eight days later, a representative from Bayer emailed the EPA: “After discussion with EPA and reviewing these options carefully, Bayer would like to proceed as described below …
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-20
🔮 “[Companies] are permitted to submit mitigation ideas that preserve their product’s utility, and EPA also will independently develop its own proposed mitigations.

Claims (34 extracted, 1 hedged)

The EPA allowed pesticide giant Bayer to pick from a menu of regulation options for the controversial and destructive weedkiller dicamba, newly released internal agency documents show. asserted
documents → allow → weedkiller
The documents provide an unusually clear look into the process of developing pesticide regulations, which is typically done out of public view. asserted
which → provide → view
It shows in detail how the EPA asked Bayer which regulations it wanted, received a response from Bayer, then put Bayer’s choices into a proposed federal rule. asserted
it → show → rule
Dicamba is drift prone and kills vegetation and crops for miles around fields where it is sprayed, and is linked to liver cancer and Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. asserted
it → kill → cancer
Courts have twice ordered it off the market because of its drift problems, but the EPA has re-approved it. The EPA solicited Bayer’s input on the level of restrictions to limit dicamba volatility and runoff, ranging from more protective to less protective, records released in ongoing litigation over the substance show. asserted
records → order → substance
The EPA concluded one presentation with a slide entitled “Registrant response needed” which posed the question “Which mitigation option to go forward with?” asserted
option → conclude → question
Bayer chose the least protective for one regulation, and the middle of three levels of protection for another regulation. asserted
Bayer → choose → regulation
It also got one other change it requested into the rule. asserted
it → get → rule
Pesticide regulations are typically a negotiation between industry and the EPA, but the exchange that the documents reveal is “crossing a line”, said Nathan Donley, environmental health science director with the Center for Biological Diversity, which is litigating on the issue. asserted
which → reveal → issue
“The EPA is allowing Bayer to choose its preferred measures to limit dicamba’s damage as if it was ordering up a late-night dinner à la carte from Chili’s,” Donley said. asserted
Donley → allow → Chili
“It becomes troublesome when the EPA allows them to regulate themselves by choosing the mitigations.” asserted
them → become → mitigations
The Center for Biological Diversity and the Center for Food Safety brought the lawsuit. asserted
Center → bring → lawsuit
The documents come as the EPA has faced criticism for stacking its leadership with industry veterans. asserted
EPA → come → veterans
The top four toxics office positions at the EPA are held by former chemical industry leaders, including Kyle Kunkler, a former pesticide industry lobbyist who is now a deputy assistant administrator and oversees the pesticides program. asserted
who → hold → program
Despite repeated assurances from the EPA that it has put effective protections in place, dicamba drift has damaged millions of acres of farmland and caused damage to orchards, vegetable farms, home gardens, native plants, trees and wildlife refuges across the country since its first approval in 2016. asserted
drift → repeat → 2016
Experts have found dicamba drift damage to be the worst of any herbicide in the history of US agriculture. asserted
damage → find → agriculture
Still, the current approval provides even fewer protections from dicamba drift and damage than past approvals, the lawsuit alleges. asserted
lawsuit → provide → approvals
In a statement to the Guardian, an EPA spokesperson said: “Make no mistake: this is not a compliance failure; it is the regulatory system working exactly as intended.” asserted
it → say → mistake
“The agency notifies the [pesticide maker] and works with them to identify possible solutions” to risks, the spokesperson wrote. asserted
spokesperson → notify → risks
“[Companies] are permitted to submit mitigation ideas that preserve their product’s utility, and EPA also will independently develop its own proposed mitigations. asserted
EPA → permit → mitigations
To be explicitly clear: the registrant does not dictate terms.” asserted
registrant → dictate → terms
During a May 2025 EPA meeting with Bayer, the agency gave Bayer two mitigation choices that would allegedly address dicamba’s high volatility, which is what makes it drift prone. uncertain
it → give → volatility
A more restrictive option would have prevented dicamba applications above 85F, and a less restrictive option would allow applications up to 95F, if the acreage treated was reduced. asserted
acreage → prevent → 95F
The EPA also gave Bayer three options for addressing dicamba runoff, documents show. asserted
documents → give → runoff
It then concluded the presentation with a solicitation for Bayer to decide. asserted
Bayer → conclude → solicitation
An EPA manager then wrote in an email that “the next step in the process beyond the [presentation] is getting feedback from the registrants on what mitigation and mitigation implementation option they would like to move forward with”. asserted
they → write → option
Separate documents obtained by the Center for Biological Diversity showed the plan was presented to Nancy Beck, a controversial former lobbyist for the American Chemistry Council who now leads the EPA’s office of chemical safety. asserted
who → obtain → safety
The revelations drew condemnation from “make America healthy again” (Maha) advocate Kelly Ryerson, who said: “It is now undeniable that the EPA remains fully captured by a crooked collection of pesticide company players who so enthusiastically ignore the substantial losses of farmers and the federal courts who mandated a halt to dicamba use.” Eight days later, a representative from Bayer emailed the EPA: “After discussion with EPA and reviewing these options carefully, Bayer would like to proceed as described below … asserted
Bayer → draw → options
Bayer chose the less restrictive option for volatility mitigation, which would allow it to be applied at up to 95 degrees as long as the dicamba-treated area would be reduced. asserted
area → choose → degrees
Bayer also wanted another option that the EPA had not proposed, emails show. asserted
emails → want → that
It would allow full-field dicamba treatments at higher temperatures if dicamba was not tank mixed. asserted
dicamba → allow → temperatures
The EPA granted both requests, and Bayer’s preferred option for mitigating run off. asserted
EPA → grant → run
These were included in the rules proposed a few months later, documents show. asserted
documents → include → rules
“In return for this egregiousness, I would like the EPA to propose a menu of options to Maha for significantly decreasing our exposure to known carcinogens and endocrine disruptors,” Ryerson added. asserted
Ryerson → like → carcinogens
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support