Photo via Washington Examiner

Washington stalled. Crypto didn’t

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Flanakin, D. (2026, September 20). Washington stalled. Crypto didn’t. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/op-eds/4732675/clarity-act-crypto-regulation-senate/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-09-20 · by Duggan Flanakin

Quick Summary

The Senate's failure to advance the CLARITY Act highlights ongoing regulatory uncertainty in the U.S. for digital assets, despite their rapid development and adoption. AXG, a company focused on regulation-first stablecoin issuance, reported significant growth with $1.04 billion in trading volume and $848.8 million in assets under administration recently, showcasing the scale of activity in this space. The article emphasizes that regulatory clarity is crucial not just for classifying digital assets but also ensuring their interoperability within traditional financial systems, as seen with AXG's compliance approach and recent SEC exemption for tokenized securities trading.
Written by AI on 2026-09-21, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On September 15, the U.S. Senate was set to vote on advancing the Clarity Act, a bill that aims to establish federal regulations for digital assets like cryptocurrency. The House had already passed the legislation, but disagreements persisted over ethics and regulatory concerns. Key opponents included Senator Mike Rounds (R-SD) and Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC), who warned it was unlikely to pass due to unresolved issues regarding President Donald Trump's conflicts of interest in crypto investments. Despite support from industry groups that spent $451 million on lobbying, significant hurdles remained, with some Democrats demanding stronger ethics provisions to prevent financial conflicts for the president and his family. The vote was seen as a critical test for both the cryptocurrency market and political forces ahead of the November midterm elections.

Written for “Crypto Regulation Debate” on 2026-10-30, grounded in this article and the 13 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Crypto Regulation Debate
Politics · 14 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 3% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
CBS News
Hedges 2 of 24 claims Outlet record 66/100
Semafor
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 1 of 6 claims Outlet record 60/100
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 7 of 51 claims Outlet record 70/100
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 64/100
Reason
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 4 of 26 claims Outlet record 67/100
The Intercept
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 4 of 62 claims Outlet record 97/100
“Article A focuses on Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand's change of stance and lobbying efforts around a crypto bill, while Article B discusses the broader implications and failure of the CLARITY Act in Congress.”
Washington Examiner
Hedges 0 of 36 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of cryptocurrency regulation and taxation over a period, not a single specific incident.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
35
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
3%
1 of 35 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
70/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
14
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-21 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 3800 article(s) · 7 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 7 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Duggan Flanakin
4 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The question is no longer simply who can build the largest model, but who will control the infrastructure required to run AI at scale.
🔮 The Senate vote may have delayed legislative clarity.
2026-09-20 · assertive framing · Washington stalled. Crypto didn’t
🔮 Those are significant claims, and the court will ultimately determine whether they have merit.
🔮 A 2025 U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission report identified 37 Chinese port projects across Latin America and the Caribbean, warning that such facilities could be used to disrupt U.S. trade, monitor naval activity, or support coercive operations during a crisis.
Also by Duggan Flanakin
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

AXG America Congress Senate Washington

Subjects

AXG ORG · 4× Washington GPE · 3× Congress ORG · 2× America GPE · 1× Bahrain GPE · 1× Bahraini NORP · 1× Senate ORG · 1× the Securities and Exchange Commission ORG · 1×

Narrative

The agency said eligible tokenized securities must provide the same shareholder rights as traditional shares, including dividends and voting rights, while synthetic tokens that merely track stock prices without representing ownership are excluded.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-21
🔮 The Senate vote may have delayed legislative clarity.
2026-09-21 · Washington Examiner
Washington stalled. Crypto didn’t · assertive framing

Claims (35 extracted, 1 hedged)

Washington’s latest crypto setback should not be mistaken for the end of America’s digital asset experiment. asserted
setback → mistake → experiment
But it should force a more practical question: What does the financial system need from regulation when Congress cannot yet agree on the rules? asserted
Congress → force → rules
The Senate’s failure this week to advance the CLARITY Act was a significant development. asserted
failure → advance → Act
The legislation fell short of the 60 votes required to proceed, leaving comprehensive federal rules for digital assets unresolved. asserted
legislation → fall → assets
That uncertainty matters because the underlying technology is continuing to move. asserted
technology → matter → ?
Stablecoins are no longer confined to crypto-native trading platforms. asserted
Stablecoins → confine → platforms
Tokenization is moving traditional financial assets onto blockchain networks, while financial institutions are experimenting with artificial intelligence, automated payments, and digital representations of securities. asserted
institutions → move → securities
The scale of activity is becoming increasingly difficult to dismiss. asserted
scale → become → activity
Recent operating measures reported by AXG include $1.04 billion in stablecoin and fiat-currency trading volume (a 395% increase) and $848.8 million in assets under administration (also up 347%). asserted
measures → report → administration
The regulatory question is therefore becoming less about whether these technologies exist and more about how they should operate within the existing financial system. asserted
they → become → system
You see, AXG offers one illustration of where this evolution is heading. asserted
evolution → see → illustration
The company describes itself as a regulation-first stablecoin issuer and recently received final approval from Bahrain’s central bank, alongside what it describes as the world’s first Sharia certification for a stablecoin. asserted
it → describe → stablecoin
Its proposed products include U.S.-dollar and Bahraini-dinar stablecoins backed 1-to-1 by corresponding reserves. asserted
products → propose → reserves
For stablecoins to become useful payment instruments, banks, payment networks, custodians, and fintech companies must know when and how they can interact with them. asserted
they → become → them
AXG executives described this as a “stablecoin sandwich,” in which compliance and acceptance must exist on both the fiat entry and exit points of a transaction. asserted
compliance → describe → transaction
That challenge becomes even more important as tokenization expands. asserted
tokenization → become → ?
Real-world assets including bonds, money-market instruments, and potentially equities can be represented on blockchain infrastructure. asserted
assets → include → infrastructure
Tokenization can potentially allow fractional ownership, faster settlement, and broader access, but those benefits depend on preserving the legal rights and protections associated with the underlying assets. asserted
benefits → allow → assets
Interestingly, Washington’s regulatory machinery is already moving in that direction even as legislation remains stalled. asserted
legislation → move → direction
On Sept. 17, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced a five-year exemption intended to facilitate trading of tokenized stocks. asserted
Commission → announce → stocks
The agency said eligible tokenized securities must provide the same shareholder rights as traditional shares, including dividends and voting rights, while synthetic tokens that merely track stock prices without representing ownership are excluded. asserted
that → say → ownership
Innovation does not necessarily require abandoning established investor protections. asserted
Innovation → require → protections
It can mean applying those protections to a new technological infrastructure. asserted
It → mean → infrastructure
The same principle should apply to stablecoins and AI-enabled finance. asserted
principle → apply → stablecoins
AXG is experimenting with the intersection of AI and blockchain through agentic payments — systems in which AI agents can potentially execute transactions on behalf of users. asserted
agents → experiment → users
That raises a new regulatory problem: If an AI agent can access a bank account, brokerage account, or digital wallet, how does the financial system establish that the agent is authorized to act? asserted
agent → raise → account
The company has proposed the concept of “Know Your Agent,” or KYA, as a complement to traditional identity verification. asserted
company → propose → verification
The CLARITY Act’s stalled progress therefore leaves Washington with unfinished business, not a disappearing industry. asserted
progress → stall → business
Congress still faces the task of defining regulatory boundaries, protecting consumers, addressing conflicts of interest, and establishing durable rules for businesses operating across securities, commodities, payments, and banking. asserted
Congress → face → securities
Meanwhile, regulators and markets are continuing to experiment. asserted
regulators → continue → ?
America’s challenge is to ensure that technological innovation and financial safeguards advance together. asserted
innovation → ensure → ?
It should be a framework in which legitimate digital assets can operate transparently, consumers retain meaningful protections, and American financial institutions can compete in an increasingly tokenized global economy. asserted
institutions → operate → economy
The Senate vote may have delayed legislative clarity. uncertain
vote → delay → clarity
It has not delayed the technology. asserted
It → delay → technology
Washington now has to catch up. asserted
Washington → have → ?
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support