Photo via Washington Examiner

How 9 senators get to hold 80% of America hostage

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Paz, D. D. L. (2026, September 20). How 9 senators get to hold 80% of America hostage. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/op-eds/4733029/filibuster-undermines-constitutional-majority-rule/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-09-20 · by David De La Paz

Quick Summary

A Wall Street Journal op-ed argues that the filibuster rule protects against concentrated power and aligns with constitutional principles, but critics argue this contradicts the framers' intent for majority rule. They cite Alexander Hamilton's warnings in Federalist 22 about supermajority rules leading to minority control and undermining government effectiveness. The article asserts that the current Senate filibuster rule, which requires a 60-vote threshold for most legislation to proceed, violates the constitutional design by giving disproportionate power to a small group of senators.
Written by AI on 2026-09-21, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In his Wall Street Journal op-ed, former Senator Ben Sasse argues that the filibuster rule protects against consolidated power. However, critics like David De La Paz counter that if the filibuster were part of the Constitution, it would undermine the republican form of government intended by the Founding Fathers. According to Federalist 22, Alexander Hamilton emphasized the principle that "the sense of the majority should prevail," but the filibuster's requirement of a 60-vote supermajority for cloture can be seen as frustrating this democratic ideal.

The current 9 senators can effectively block legislation supported by a majority through the filibuster rule. This is reminiscent of the use of supermajorities in the pre-Constitutional Articles of Confederation, which were ultimately deemed ineffective and led to the creation of the Constitution. Critics argue that such a system allows for minority rule and undermines democratic governance.

Written for “Senate Filibuster Abuse” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Senate Filibuster Abuse
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
53
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
11%
6 of 53 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
70/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-21 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 3851 article(s) · 7 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 7 correction(s)

Who wrote this

David De La Paz
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The truth is, if the filibuster rule were included in the Constitution, it would have undermined the republican form of government the Framers created.
2026-09-20 · assertive framing · How 9 senators get to hold 80% of America hostage
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Articles Articles of Confederation Constitution Federalist 22 Wall Street Journal

Subjects

Alexander Hamilton PERSON · 2× Ballin PERSON · 2× Congress ORG · 2× Hamilton PERSON · 2× Ben Sasse PERSON · 1× House ORG · 1× U.S. GPE · 1× Wall Street Journal ORG · 1× the Supreme Court ORG · 1×

Narrative

He said, “To give a minority a negative upon the majority … is in its tendency to subject the sense of a greater number to that of the lesser number,” and serves to “destroy the energy of government, and to substitute the pleasure, caprice or artifices of an insignificant, turbulent or corrupt junto, to the regular deliberations and decisions of a respectable majority.”
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-21
🔮 The truth is, if the filibuster rule were included in the Constitution, it would have undermined the republican form of government the Framers created.
2026-09-21 · Washington Examiner
How 9 senators get to hold 80% of America hostage · assertive framing

Claims (53 extracted, 6 hedged)

In his recent Wall Street Journal op-ed, “America Needs the Filibuster,” former Sen. Ben Sasse argues the filibuster “provides a bulwark against consolidated power.” asserted
filibuster → need → power
Later, he states the filibuster rule, “plays a critical role in limiting and dividing power … asserted
rule → state → power
the filibuster safeguards the spirit of the Constitution’s anticonsolidation objective.” asserted
filibuster → safeguard → objective
The truth is, if the filibuster rule were included in the Constitution, it would have undermined the republican form of government the Framers created. asserted
Framers → include → government
The filibuster rule undermines majority rule asserted
rule → undermine → rule
In Federalist 22, Alexander Hamilton described “the fundamental maxim of republican form of government … that the sense of the majority should prevail.” asserted
sense → describe → majority
The filibuster rule, through its creation of a supermajority 60-vote cloture requirement, blocking a bill’s passage when supported by a majority, frustrates that “fundamental maxim.” asserted
blocking → block → maxim
The 60-vote supermajority cloture requirement creates a veto power for up to 9 members of the minority party (depending on the size of the majority). asserted
requirement → create → majority
The rationale for this approach is similar to the use of supermajorities in the failed Articles of Confederation (Articles) — the governing document that preceded the Constitution. asserted
that → fail → Constitution
Drawing on his experience under the Articles, Alexander Hamilton, in Federalist 22, characterized the use of supermajorities as “poison.” asserted
Hamilton → draw → poison
He said, “To give a minority a negative upon the majority … is in its tendency to subject the sense of a greater number to that of the lesser number,” and serves to “destroy the energy of government, and to substitute the pleasure, caprice or artifices of an insignificant, turbulent or corrupt junto, to the regular deliberations and decisions of a respectable majority.” asserted
give → say → majority
He warned that when national action was needed, if a stubborn minority can “controul the opinion of a majority” regarding the best way of conducting business, “the majority in order that something may be done, must conform to the views of the minority; and thus the sense of the smaller number will over-rule that of the greater,” leading to “tedious delays” and “contemptible compromises of the public good.” uncertain
sense → warn → good
The effect of supermajorities Hamilton was describing is indistinguishable from the effect of the supermajority cloture vote requirement of the filibuster rule. asserted
Hamilton → describe → rule
It takes control from the majority and gives it to a few in the minority. asserted
It → take → minority
The filibuster rule distorts constitutional design The Founders designed regular business to be determined by a majority vote in both chambers under Article 1, Section V of the Constitution, providing “a majority of each shall constitute a quorum to do business.” asserted
majority → distort → business
They also restricted the use of supermajorities to extraordinary circumstances: overriding vetoes, treaties, convictions in impeachment trials, constitutional amendments, and expelling members from Congress. asserted
They → restrict → Congress
In U.S. v. Ballin (1892), importers challenged a federal statute’s validity, arguing that it was improperly passed by the House because the Speaker counted nonvoting members present in the chamber in establishing a quorum under a House Rule. asserted
Speaker → challenge → Rule
In rejecting the claim, the Supreme Court explained: “When a majority are present the house [is] in a position to do business. uncertain
house → reject → business
Its capacity to transact business is then established, created by the mere presence of a majority, and does not depend upon the disposition or assent or action of any single member or fraction of the majority present.” asserted
capacity → transact → majority
Ballin is clear that the mere presence of a majority establishes the authority of a chamber of Congress to conduct business, notwithstanding the lack of approval from any fraction of its members. asserted
presence → establish → members
The filibuster rules’ 60-vote cloture threshold blocking the action of a majority directly conflicts with the Constitution’s grant of authority. asserted
threshold → block → authority
The Constitution was meticulously designed to separate the powers of the federal government and carry out the fundamental maxim of majority rule, as Hamilton described. asserted
Hamilton → design → rule
The Constitution separates federal powers among our three branches of government: Executive, legislative, and judicial. asserted
Constitution → separate → government
In Federalist 48, James Madison cautioned: “It will not be denied, that power is of an encroaching nature, and that it ought to be effectually restrained from passing the limits assigned to it … asserted
it → caution → it
a mere demarcation on parchment of the constitutional limits of the several departments, is not a sufficient guard against those encroachments which lead to a tyrannical concentration of all the powers of government in the same hands.” asserted
which → lead → hands
Regarding the legislative branch, Madison warned: “The legislative department is everywhere extending the sphere of its activity, and drawing all power into its impetuous vortex.” asserted
department → regard → vortex
Indeed, we see with the filibuster rule, it has had a deleterious and destabilizing effect on Congress. asserted
it → see → Congress
The House derives its powers from the people. asserted
House → derive → people
Its membership is based on population, with Representatives serving two-year terms. asserted
Representatives → base → terms
The Senate’s membership consists of two senators per state — each having six-year terms. asserted
membership → consist → terms
The Senate derives its powers from the states, as political and coequal societies. asserted
Senate → derive → societies
It was designed to provide stability, due deliberation, and to protect smaller states. asserted
It → design → states
Speaking of this design, Justice Joseph Story wrote in his classic Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, “No system could, in this respect, be more admirably contrived to ensure due deliberation and inquiry, and just results in all matters of legislation.” It must be remembered that Hamilton and Madison were seeing the effects of supermajorities from the standpoint of the unicameral (single-chamber) legislature created by the Articles. uncertain
Hamilton → speak → Articles
The filibuster rule’s grant of its veto power in the Senate adds another adverse impact on a bicameral legislature, precisely because the power shifted to the minority now rests in one chamber of Congress, and has destabilized the coequal balance between the two chambers. asserted
power → add → chambers
A small minority block of one chamber can stop the action of both chambers. asserted
block → stop → chambers
The House is subordinated to the Senate, and at a permanent disadvantage. asserted
House → subordinate → disadvantage
The disparity of power is such that the operation of Congress more closely resembles a unicameral legislature, rather than the Framers’ bicameral design. asserted
operation → resemble → design
The subordination of the House to the Senate also means the people are subordinated to the states. asserted
people → mean → states
Their connection to Congress is lost, and held hostage by a small block of the minority in a single chamber, who are generally opposed to their interests in a chamber that is not designed to represent the people’s individual interests. asserted
that → lose → interests
The Senate’s failure to pass the SAVE America Act — which requires photo ID and proof of citizenship to vote, supported by 83% of Americans according to Gallup polls — is one example of the disconnect between the people and the Senate and, by extension, Congress. uncertain
which → pass → extension
…and 13 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support