Photo via NBC News

Sen. John Barrasso says Trump isn’t violating the Constitution by banning reporters from the White House

Read the original at NBC News ↗
Cite

Marquez, A. (2026, September 20). Sen. John Barrasso says Trump isn’t violating the Constitution by banning reporters from the White House. NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/john-barrasso-says-trump-isnt-violating-constitution-banning-reporters-rcna598785

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

NBC News · collected 2026-09-20 · by Alexandra Marquez

Quick Summary

Senator John Barrasso of Wyoming stated on NBC’s "Meet the Press" that President Trump did not violate the Constitution when he banned reporters from Politico, MS NOW, and CNN from White House coverage. When asked if the ban was constitutional, Barrasso said it does not infringe upon press freedoms because he believes journalists have an obligation to report fairly. He also suggested this move would not negatively impact Republican candidates in upcoming midterm elections.
Written by AI on 2026-09-20, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On September 18, 2026, U.S. President Donald Trump announced an immediate ban on several news outlets from entering the White House, including CNN, MS NOW (formerly MSNBC), and Politico. In a social media post on his platform Truth Social, Trump accused these outlets of reporting "fiction and lies" when covering the U.S. government. The decision sparked legal action with CNN, MS NOW, and Politico filing lawsuits arguing their First Amendment rights were violated. A federal court temporarily blocked the ban but it remains contentious, with the Justice Department petitioning for its reinstatement on October 3rd. This move escalates long-standing tensions between Trump and major media outlets, raising significant concerns over freedom of the press in the United States.

Written for “Trump Bans Media Outlets From White House” on 2026-11-02, grounded in this article and the 223 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Trump Bans Media Outlets From White House
Politics · 224 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 7% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 1 of 36 claims Outlet record 66/100
NPR
Hedges 2 of 12 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Article A describes Trump's announcement of banning certain media outlets from the White House, while Article B discusses Senator John Barrasso's comments regarding whether such an action violates the Constitution.”
The Bulwark
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 1 of 11 claims
“While both articles discuss Trump's ban on reporters from Politico, MS NOW, and CNN from the White House, Article A describes the actual announcement and its immediate context, while Article B reports on a senator's comments regarding the constitutional implications of the ban. These are different specific events happening at distinct times.”
Euronews
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 1 of 23 claims Outlet record 60/100
NBC News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 8 of 35 claims Outlet record 60/100
The Independent
Hedges 0 of 5 claims Outlet record 59/100
“Article A discusses Senator Barrasso's comments about Trump banning reporters, while Article B reports on the Justice Department defending the ban in court. These are different aspects of the situation occurring at different times.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 1 of 8 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A reports on Trump announcing the ban of media outlets from the White House, while Article B discusses Senator John Barrasso's comments about the constitutionality of the ban after it has occurred.”
South China Morning Post
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 5 claims Outlet record 63/100
“Article A describes the specific incident where reporters from CNN, MS Now, and Politico were barred from the White House by President Trump. Article B covers a different but related event, reporting on Senator John Barrasso's comments about the constitutionality of the ban.”
Euronews
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 2 of 14 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Article A discusses Senator Barrasso's opinion on Trump banning reporters from the White House, while Article B reports on a federal judge ordering the restoration of press access after the ban was implemented.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
28
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
7%
2 of 28 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
60/100
NBC News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
224
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-20 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

NBC News · 1977 article(s) · 1 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 1 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Alexandra Marquez
16 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Citing potential voter confusion, the Trump administration sought to separate and preserve ballots with votes for Dan J. Sullivan, arguing that if the incumbent loses, it may be because people voted for the other Sullivan by mistake.
🔮 The doctors are encouraged by his progress, he is awake and alert, and we are optimistic he will make a full recovery.”
2026-11-01 · assertive framing · Sen. Chris Murphy hospitalized after stroke
🔮 Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., declined to say whether he would accept the results of the Alaska Senate race if Democrat Mary Peltola wins following a bombshell report from The New York Times about Democrats’ alleged efforts to recruit a candidate with the same name as the Republican incumbent.
🔮 “The construction of the Arch will inflict immediate and irreparable harm on the District and Virginia,” Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones and D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb wrote in the lawsuit.
2026-10-31 · assertive framing · Virginia and D.C. sue to stop proposed Trump arch
🔮 “I would put my money on any Democratic governor in the country against [Vice President] JD Vance or [Secretary of State] Marco Rubio in 2028,” she added, pointing to two Republicans widely expected to run for president in two years.
🔮 Bessent’s comments came shortly after Zelenskyy appeared on the program and told “Meet the Press” moderator Kristen Welker that it would be a “historic mistake” for the U.S. to side with Russia in the ongoing war.
🔮 Emanuel, who served as President Barack Obama’s chief of staff, proposed that Democrats could instead “pass an ethics package” to address the corruption he alleged is taking place in the Trump administration.
🔮 President Donald Trump on Saturday appeared to share Sen. Tom Cotton’s cellphone number in a social media post amid a push to pass the Sunshine Protection Act, which would make daylight saving time permanent nationwide.
🔮 Microsoft co-founder and billionaire philanthropist Bill Gates on Wednesday called on the U.S. to be a leader in the global regulation of artificial intelligence growth but warned that getting countries to agree on a global framework for AI regulation could be “more difficult” than Cold War-era negotiations on limiting the development of nuclear weapons.
🔮 Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., on Sunday downplayed concerns that President Donald Trump may have violated the Constitution when reporters from Politico, MS NOW and CNN were banned from covering the White House on Saturday.
Also by Alexandra Marquez
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 16 articles by Alexandra Marquez →

Topics

CNN Constitution MS NOW Politico the White House

Subjects

Barrasso PERSON · 5× the White House ORG · 5× CNN ORG · 3× MS NOW ORG · 3× Politico ORG · 3× Trump PERSON · 3× White House ORG · 2× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× John Barrasso PERSON · 1× Wyo. GPE · 1×

Narrative

We will vigorously defend our First Amendment rights against any attempt to restrict them,” the outlet’s press team wrote in a post on X. “We have a right under the U.S. Constitution to do our reporting without hinderance or interference from the government and this ban is an illegal assault on this fundamental right,” CNN said in a statement posted on X. “We will not be deflected from our duty to hold the government and other public bodies to account, and we will continue to report on the actions and processes of this administration without fear or favor,” the statement added.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-20
🔮 Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., on Sunday downplayed concerns that President Donald Trump may have violated the Constitution when reporters from Politico, MS NOW and CNN were banned from covering the White House on Saturday.

Claims (28 extracted, 2 hedged)

Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., on Sunday downplayed concerns that President Donald Trump may have violated the Constitution when reporters from Politico, MS NOW and CNN were banned from covering the White House on Saturday. uncertain
reporters → downplay → Saturday
Asked directly whether the president had violated the Constitution, Barrasso said, “No, I believe the press has an obligation to report fairly.” asserted
press → ask → obligation
Pressed again on whether he agreed with Trump’s ban, Barrasso said, “We all respect and value the freedom of the press — it’s in the Constitution.” asserted
it → press → Constitution
“He was banned from Twitter. asserted
He → ban → Twitter
He was banned from Facebook, and I didn’t see people come to his defense,” the Wyoming senator told NBC News’ “Meet the Press.” asserted
senator → ban → Press
“So it goes both ways. asserted
it → go → ways
The press has an obligation to report fairly, and the president doesn’t see it happening that way.” asserted
it → have → obligation
Pressed on whether the president’s decision to ban the reporters from White House coverage violated the First Amendment, Barrasso demurred, saying again, “I believe the press has an obligation to report fairly.” asserted
press → press → obligation
He added that he believes Trump’s decision to bar those outlets from the White House would not negatively affect Republicans running for office in the upcoming midterm elections. asserted
decision → add → elections
“The bottom line on all of this is: This is not going to have an impact on an election 44 days from now,” Barrasso said. asserted
Barrasso → go → election
“People are going to go to the voting booth. asserted
People → go → booth
They’re going to make a decision based on their life, their future, what they believe is best for them and their families.” asserted
they → go → them
The president announced Friday that he was barring three outlets from the White House, writing in a post on Truth Social that he made the decision “as a result of their constant ‘reporting’ FAKE NEWS!” asserted
he → announce → reporting
The president also warned that “other outlets” could face similar action but did not name them. uncertain
outlets → warn → them
“Media Outlets shouldn’t be able to constantly write or report FICTION and LIES when they’re covering the President of the United States, the Trump Administration, or the United States of America,” Trump added. asserted
Trump → write → America
Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office on Friday, the president said it wasn’t one particular story that led to his decision, but “cumulative stories over the last few years.” asserted
that → speak → years
Journalists from the affected outlets reported that they were turned away at the White House security kiosk on Saturday and their credentials were revoked. asserted
credentials → report → Saturday
Representatives for Politico, MS NOW and CNN pledged to continue covering the White House despite the bans. asserted
Representatives → pledge → bans
“POLITICO will continue to fairly report on this White House and future ones. asserted
POLITICO → continue → House
We will vigorously defend our First Amendment rights against any attempt to restrict them,” the outlet’s press team wrote in a post on X. “We have a right under the U.S. Constitution to do our reporting without hinderance or interference from the government and this ban is an illegal assault on this fundamental right,” CNN said in a statement posted on X. “We will not be deflected from our duty to hold the government and other public bodies to account, and we will continue to report on the actions and processes of this administration without fear or favor,” the statement added. asserted
statement → defend → fear
“MS NOW intends to take any and all steps necessary to defend our First Amendment rights and the essential role of independent journalists in our democracy,” the network said in its own statement. asserted
network → intend → statement
The White House Correspondents’ Association, a group that represents the coalition of news outlets and reporters who cover the White House, also denounced the move. asserted
who → represent → move
“The Constitution protects the freedom of the press from government interference. asserted
Constitution → protect → interference
That protection does not depend on whether the president likes a news organization’s coverage, agrees with its reporting, or approves of the questions its journalists ask,” Jacqui Heinrich, the group’s president, said in a statement. asserted
Heinrich → depend → statement
Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., appeared after Barrasso on “Meet the Press” and said banning certain news outlets from the White House violates the First Amendment. asserted
banning → appear → Amendment
“It clearly does,” the New Jersey senator said. asserted
senator → do → ?
“This president has no regard for the First Amendment,” he added. asserted
he → have → Amendment
“He’s going after reporters, and this ban just doubles down on that.” asserted
ban → go → that
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support