Photo via The Guardian

We’re not in a new Gilded Age in America: inequality is now far worse | Casey Michel

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Cite

Michel, C. (2026, September 21). We’re not in a new Gilded Age in America: inequality is now far worse | Casey Michel. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/sep/21/wealth-gap-oligarchy-gilded-age

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Guardian · collected 2026-09-21 · by Casey Michel

Quick Summary

Casey Michel argues that while the current American era may resemble the Gilded Age due to similar dynamics involving wealthy individuals influencing politics, today’s inequality is far worse. For instance, Elon Musk's net worth of around $950 billion surpasses John D. Rockefeller's adjusted wealth of approximately $30 billion at his death. Moreover, Michel points out that the richest 0.00001% now control more than double the share of total US household wealth compared to the end of the Gilded Age. Additionally, he notes how today’s laws enable modern tycoons like Musk to exert greater political influence through campaign financing than was possible during the Gilded Age despite regulations like the Tillman Act of 1907.
Written by AI on 2026-09-21, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

The current level of inequality in America is far worse than during the Gilded Age, according to economist Gabriel Zucman's calculations. The rate of total US household wealth tied to the richest 0.00001% of Americans is now more than double what it was at the end of the Gilded Age. Figures like Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and Larry Ellison wield even greater influence today compared to historical tycoons such as Cornelius Vanderbilt, Andrew Carnegie, and John D Rockefeller. For instance, while Rockefeller died worth approximately $30 billion, adjusted for inflation, Musk's net worth is now around $950 billion or more, which is over 30 times Rockefeller’s wealth.

Written for “Inequality in America” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Inequality in America
Economy/Business · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
22
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
5%
1 of 22 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
The Guardian's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Economy/Business
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-21 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Guardian · 1891 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Casey Michel
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The Tesla and Starlink chief may no longer technically be a trillionaire, but he’s now worth approximately $950bn – or more than 30 times what Rockefeller was worth.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

America American Starlink Tesla Washington

Subjects

America GPE · 3× American NORP · 3× Rockefeller PERSON · 3× Americans NORP · 2× Musk PERSON · 2× Andrew Carnegie PERSON · 1× Cornelius Vanderbilt PERSON · 1× Elon Musk PERSON · 1× John D Rockefeller PERSON · 1× Washington GPE · 1×

Narrative

As the economist Gabriel Zucman calculated last year, the rate of total US household wealth now attached to the richest 0.00001% in the US is more than double what it was towards the end of the Gilded Age – and that was before Donald Trump returned to the White House, accelerating the US’s wealth inequality.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-21
🔮 The Tesla and Starlink chief may no longer technically be a trillionaire, but he’s now worth approximately $950bn – or more than 30 times what Rockefeller was worth.

Claims (22 extracted, 1 hedged)

For many, the era of US history that most resembles contemporary America is easy to identify: the Gilded Age. asserted
that → resemble → America
Like modern America, the Gilded Age saw a small number of men tower over US politics and industry alike. asserted
number → see → politics
Rising atop a swell of wealth inequality, figures like Cornelius Vanderbilt, Andrew Carnegie and John D Rockefeller mixed private interests with public policy, opening doors in Washington and beyond with ease. asserted
figures → rise → ease
Yet the further we get into the 2020s, the more the comparison to the Gilded Age risks obscuring, rather than enlightening, realities in the US. asserted
comparison → get → US
But the current situation in the US now dwarfs even the height of the Gilded Age, both in terms of the total levels of wealth inequality brought to bear, as well as the influence this small cohort of men now have. asserted
cohort → dwarf → men
Rockefeller, the richest of the Gilded Age tycoons, died worth the equivalent of approximately $30bn, adjusted for inflation. asserted
Rockefeller → die → inflation
The Tesla and Starlink chief may no longer technically be a trillionaire, but he’s now worth approximately $950bn – or more than 30 times what Rockefeller was worth. uncertain
Rockefeller → ’ → what
Of course, the average American is likewise wealthier than their Gilded Age predecessors, even adjusting for inflation, both in nominal terms and purchasing power. asserted
American → adjust → terms
So perhaps it’s worth examining instead the rate of total American wealth controlled by the current crop of figures. asserted
it → ’ → figures
As the economist Gabriel Zucman calculated last year, the rate of total US household wealth now attached to the richest 0.00001% in the US is more than double what it was towards the end of the Gilded Age – and that was before Donald Trump returned to the White House, accelerating the US’s wealth inequality. asserted
Trump → calculate → inequality
Then again, perhaps it’s not simply about the sheer heights of the finances now controlled by a vanishingly small number of Americans. asserted
it → ’ → Americans
It’s also about how that money can now be used – which is now far beyond any kind of Gilded Age precedent as well. asserted
which → ’ → precedent
While it’s true that those original robber barons used much of their wealth to target politicians, developments toward the end of the Gilded Age specifically hemmed in this kind of corporate financing of American campaigns. asserted
developments → ’ → campaigns
These efforts culminated with the passage of the Tillman Act, signed into law by Teddy Roosevelt in 1907, which specifically barred corporate financing of federal politicians. asserted
which → culminate → politicians
Thanks in large part (but not exclusively) to the Citizens United decision in 2010, US elections remain as open as they’ve ever been to deep-pocketed donors. asserted
they → remain → donors
Figures like Musk alone have been able to offload hundreds of millions of dollars in pursuit of his own political and financial aims – far beyond anything Rockefeller and his cohort ever dreamed. asserted
Rockefeller → offload → anything
There’s one other key difference that places this current era beyond even the Gilded Age: the explosion of offshore and financial secrecy tools available at a moment’s notice. asserted
that → ’ → notice
Thanks to the proliferation of everything from anonymous shell companies to perpetual trusts, these wealthiest forces can now mask their riches from any investigators, regulators, journalists and others – and entrench the kind of aristocracy Americans have long chafed against. asserted
Americans → mask → aristocracy
Indeed, the combination of collapsing campaign finance regulations and anonymous financial tools led to nearly $2bn in dark, untraceable funds swirling around the US’s most recent election – a reality that even those during the Gilded Age would wonder at. asserted
those → collapse → Age
But the scope, scale, speed and sheer ease with which wealthy figures can grow, protect and unleash their wealth – and the implications for the future of US democracy – now set this era apart from anything previous. asserted
figures → grow → anything
And this isn’t even considering the ideological shifts seen within the current crop of America’s wealthiest; where previous figures like Carnegie or Vanderbilt at least seeded universities and libraries, we now have, as Dartmouth’s Brooke Harrington noted, “noblesse without the oblige”. asserted
Harrington → consider → oblige
And if those wealthy figures would have their way, it’s an era that’s only just beginning. asserted
that → have → way
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support