Photo via Reason

MSNBC Pundit's Tweet Accusing Lawyer of "Coach[ing]" Jan. 6 Hearing Witness "to Lie" Wasn't Negligent

Read the original at Reason ↗
Cite

Volokh, E. (2026, September 21). MSNBC Pundit's Tweet Accusing Lawyer of "Coach[ing]" Jan. 6 Hearing Witness "to Lie" Wasn't Negligent. Reason. https://reason.com/volokh/2026/09/21/msnbc-pundits-tweet-accusing-lawyer-of-coaching-jan-6-hearing-witness-to-lie-wasnt-negligent/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Reason · collected 2026-09-21 · by Eugene Volokh

Quick Summary

Judge Loren AliKhan ruled that MSNBC pundit Andrew Weissmann's tweet accusing lawyer Stefan Passantino of coaching January 6 hearing witness Cassidy Hutchinson to lie was not negligent. The case stems from a September 2023 social media post by Weissmann where he claimed Passantino coached Hutchinson, who testified before Congress about events surrounding the January 6 attack. During her testimony, Hutchinson alleged that Passantino advised her to downplay her role and avoid mentioning certain incidents during their preparation meetings in February 2022.
Written by AI on 2026-09-21, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In September 2023, Andrew Weissmann, a MSNBC pundit, accused Stefan Passantino of coaching Cassidy Hutchinson to lie during her testimony before the Select Committee investigating the January 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol. Passantino was a former Trump administration senior lawyer who represented Hutchinson at her first three closed-door depositions on February 23 and March 7, 2022, and again on May 17, 2022. After these sessions, in early June 2022, Hutchinson fired Passantino. In his recent decision, Judge Loren AliKhan (D.D.C.) ruled that Weissmann's tweet was not negligent, despite acknowledging that Passantino told Hutchinson not to lie. However, Weissmann argued that by instructing her to claim she did not recall answers when asked, he effectively coached her to make false statements, a contentious point in the case.

Written for “Jan 6 Hearings Controversy” on 2026-11-02, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Jan 6 Hearings Controversy
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
80
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
18%
14 of 80 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
67/100
Reason's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-21 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Reason · 1056 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Eugene Volokh
184 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Some excerpts from the long First Superseding Indictment in U.S. v. Hakim (E.D. Mich.), filed Oct. 21, alleging conspiracy to transmit threats in interstate commerce as well as, for two defendants, witness intimidation and destruction of property to prevent seizure (8 of the 12 defendants had originally been indicted in May); the targets included UM officials and businesses connected with them, as well as the Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Detroit:
🔮 Because "[t]he costs and efforts required to defend a lawsuit through [discovery] could chill free speech nearly as effectively as the absence of the actual malice standard altogether[,]" a public figure plaintiff must plausibly allege actual malice at the outset of the litigation.
🔮 The First Amendment forbids a State from using its investigative power that way, and I will not allow it while this case is pending.
🔮 The same logic could apply to nuns who had felt religious pressure to do the educational or nursing work that their order was known for, or to monks who had felt religious pressure to do agricultural work that supports the monastery.
2026-10-30 · assertive framing · Amicus Brief in OneTaste Criminal Prosecution
🔮 Before doing so, "he entered the coffee shop to purchase a cookie, which he hoped would be seen as a sign of goodwill."
🔮 While individuals who are the subjects of unwanted speech may be able to limit some speech directed to them, they cannot limit offensive speech about them directed to others.
🔮 Because "the conduct regulated depend[ed] on—and [could not] be separated from—the ideas communicated," Florida's law was "functionally a regulation of speech" implicating the First Amendment.
🔮 You might assume that some judge is "woke" or "Trumpy" or what have you, but there's a pretty good chance that the judge's legal analysis is still correct.
🔮 The hope would be to siphon votes away from Sullivan.
🔮 Alas, like other formerly unique human skills, I expect this one too will fall victim to competition from AI.
Also by Eugene Volokh
Open Thread
2026-11-02 · Reason
Open Thread
2026-11-01 · Reason
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 184 articles by Eugene Volokh →

Topics

Congress D.D.C. Select Committee the House of Representatives the Select Committee

Subjects

Passantino PERSON · 14× Hutchinson PERSON · 11× the Select Committee ORG · 3× Select Committee ORG · 2× Trump PERSON · 2× Weissmann PERSON · 2× D.D.C. GPE · 1× Loren AliKhan PERSON · 1× Stefan Passantino PERSON · 1× The Volokh PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Indeed, Mr. Weismann acknowledges Ms. Hutchinson's full account of Mr. Passantino's statements—including that Mr. Passantino expressly told her not to lie—but he argues that Mr. Passantino nonetheless coached her to make false statements to the Select Committee by telling her to say she did not recall answers to their questions even when she did….
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-21
🔮 Mr. Passantino [a former Trump administration senior lawyer] represented Ms. Hutchinson at her first three closed-door Select Committee depositions on February 23, March 7, and May 17, 2022.

Claims (80 extracted, 14 hedged)

Plaintiff Stefan Passantino brings this action against Defendant Andrew Weissmann, alleging defamation stemming from a September 2023 social media post. asserted
Passantino → bring → post
In the post, Mr. Weissmann referred to Mr. Passantino—a lawyer—as someone "who coached [a witness appearing before Congress] to lie." asserted
who → refer → Congress
In 2021, the House of Representatives established a Select Committee to investigate the January 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol. asserted
House → establish → Capitol
As part of its investigation, the Select Committee interviewed numerous witnesses, including Cassidy Hutchinson, a former special assistant to President Trump who had been serving under the direction of White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows on January 6, 2021. asserted
who → interview → January
Mr. Passantino [a former Trump administration senior lawyer] represented Ms. Hutchinson at her first three closed-door Select Committee depositions on February 23, March 7, and May 17, 2022. uncertain
Passantino → represent → February
In early June 2022, after the third deposition, Ms. Hutchinson fired Mr. Passantino and retained new counsel. asserted
Hutchinson → fire → counsel
She subsequently gave a fourth, televised deposition on June 28, which received substantial media coverage. asserted
which → give → coverage
After her fourth deposition, Ms. Hutchinson sent a letter to the Select Committee stating that she intended to "waive [her] attorney-client privilege [with Mr. Passantino] in order to share information with the [C]ommittee that[] [was] relevant to [her] prior testimony." asserted
that → send → testimony
The Select Committee scheduled her for a fifth, closed-door deposition for September 14, 2022. asserted
Committee → schedule → September
According to Ms. Hutchinson, she had asked a friend to "back channel to the committee and say that there [were] a few things that [she] want[ed] to talk about." uncertain
she → accord → committee
[She also said] that she did "not [want to] let Stefan [Passantino] know that [she was] back channeling for this interview" …. asserted
she → say → interview
At her fifth deposition, Ms. Hutchinson testified about the preparation she and Mr. Passantino had conducted ahead of her first Select Committee deposition. asserted
she → testify → deposition
Specifically, she told the Committee that she and Mr. Passantino had met "for a couple hours" on February 16, 2022 to discuss her upcoming testimony. asserted
she → tell → testimony
When Ms. Hutchinson suggested printing out a calendar so that she could "get[] the dates right" with respect to timelines of events, Mr. Passantino said "No, no, no." uncertain
Passantino → suggest → events
He told her: "We're going to downplay your role" and "the less you remember, the better." asserted
you → tell → role
When Ms. Hutchinson brought up an incident that occurred inside the presidential limousine on January 6 (about which she had been told by a colleague), Mr. Passantino said "No, no, no, no, no. asserted
Passantino → bring → colleague
We don't want to go there. asserted
We → want → ?
We don't want to talk about that." asserted
We → want → that
Mr. Passantino told Ms. Hutchinson: "If you don't 100 percent recall something, even if you don't recall a date or somebody who may or may not have been in the room, ['I don't recall' is] an entirely fine answer, and we want you to use that response as much as you deem necessary." uncertain
you → tell → response
Ms. Hutchinson then asked, "if I do recall something but not every little detail, … can I still say I don't recall?" to which Mr. Passantino replied, "Yes." asserted
Passantino → ask → which
The morning of the first deposition, Mr. Passantino reminded Ms. Hutchinson to "[j]ust downplay [her] position," telling her that her "go-to [response was] 'I don't recall.'" asserted
I → remind → her
Ms. Hutchinson also discussed a line of questioning from her first deposition about the January 6 incident in the presidential limousine. asserted
Hutchinson → discuss → limousine
She explained that, during a break after facing repeated questions on the topic, she had told Mr. Passantino in private, "I'm f[*****]. asserted
I → explain → Passantino
I just lied." asserted
I → lie → ?
Mr. Passantino responded, "You didn't lie…. asserted
You → respond → ?
They don't know what you know, Cassidy. asserted
you → know → what
They don't know that you can recall some of these things. asserted
you → know → things
So you saying 'I don't recall' is an entirely acceptable response to this." asserted
I → say → this
He concluded, "You're doing exactly what you should be doing." asserted
you → conclude → what
Ms. Hutchinson explained that, in the moment, she "[felt] like [she] couldn't be forthcoming when [she] wanted to be." asserted
she → explain → moment
Ms. Hutchinson did, however, state: "I want to make this clear to [the Select Committee]: Stefan [Passantino] never told me to lie." asserted
Passantino → state → me
She recalled him saying to her: "I don't want you to perjure yourself, but 'I don't recall' isn't perjury. asserted
recall → recall → yourself
They don't know what you can and can't recall." asserted
you → know → what
Ms. Hutchinson then reiterated to the Select Committee, "[H]e didn't tell me to lie. asserted
H]e → reiterate → me
He told me not to lie." asserted
He → tell → me
Mr. Passantino acknowledges that the deposition transcript accurately reflects Ms. Hutchinson's statements at her fifth deposition, although he disputes the veracity of her account except to the extent Ms. Hutchinson testified that he instructed her not to lie. asserted
he → acknowledge → her
At the Committee's final public session on December 19, 2022, Representative Zoe Lofgren stated that the Committee had "obtained evidence" that "one lawyer told a witness the witness could in certain circumstances tell the Committee that she didn't recall facts when she actually did recall them." uncertain
she → state → them
After the Committee released the transcripts of Ms. Hutchinson's closed-door depositions, multiple news outlets identified Mr. Passantino as the "lawyer" that Representative Lofgren had referenced. asserted
Lofgren → release → that
Nine months later, Mr. Weissmann—a former prosecutor who now serves as a "political pundit" for MSNBC—posted the following on Twitter (now known as X): Mr. Weissmann made the post in response to an alert that Mr. Hunt had received a subpoena in an unrelated case. asserted
Hunt → serve → case
Mr. Weissmann had approximately 320,000 followers on X at the time…. asserted
Weissmann → have → time
…and 40 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support