Photo via Toronto Star

Danielle Smith, your separatist sympathies are showing

Read the original at Toronto Star ↗
Cite

Steward, G. (2026, September 22). Danielle Smith, your separatist sympathies are showing. Toronto Star. https://www.thestar.com/opinion/contributors/danielle-smith-your-separatist-sympathies-are-showing/article_6e746ae3-0142-4a0e-93ac-7d976cb4d404.html

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Toronto Star · collected 2026-09-22 · by Gillian Steward

Quick Summary

Danielle Smith, Alberta's Premier, addresses concerns over potential provincial separation through ambiguous rhetoric and campaign messaging ahead of an upcoming referendum. During a virtual assembly, she spoke about Albertans' feelings of neglect by the federal government without clearly endorsing staying within Canada. Her government’s $4 million advertising campaign emphasizes “standing up for a strong and sovereign Alberta,” focusing on perceived negative impacts from Ottawa rather than advocating for remaining in Canada. Critics argue that Smith's tactics provide hope to separatists while avoiding concrete commitments, raising doubts about her true intentions regarding the referendum.
Written by AI on 2026-09-22, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Danielle Smith, Premier of Alberta, addressed concerns about separatist sentiments during a virtual assembly on October 29, 2023. Despite officially supporting unity with Canada, her rhetoric suggests otherwise, as she emphasized Albertans' feelings of being undervalued and hurt. This sentiment was echoed in the provincial government’s $4 million advertising campaign for an upcoming referendum on Alberta's future within Canada. The ads focus more on promoting a strong and sovereign Alberta rather than highlighting the benefits of remaining part of Canada. Critics argue that Smith’s public statements and the ad campaign imply she may secretly support separatist ideas, despite her official stance against separation.

Written for “Canadian Politics Separatist Concerns” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Canadian Politics Separatist Concerns
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 5% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Daily Mail
Hedges 3 of 22 claims Outlet record 69/100
“Article A describes Danielle Smith's comments about Albertans' sentiments during a virtual assembly, while Article B reports on her revealing financial costs related to migrants at a press conference.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 3 of 34 claims Outlet record 64/100
“Article A discusses federalist organizers' criticism of Alberta's Conservative MPs for not addressing the upcoming separation referendum, while Article B focuses on Premier Danielle Smith's statements about Albertans' feelings and her position towards the referendum.”
CBC News
Hedges 4 of 29 claims Outlet record 74/100
“The articles discuss different parts of Premier Danielle Smith's stance on the separation question and her communications with Albertans, not the same specific incident or statement.”
CBC News
Hedges 8 of 38 claims Outlet record 74/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Danielle Smith's political situation without describing the same specific incident.”
Times of India
⚖️ Leans right further left than this Hedges 14 of 152 claims Outlet record 59/100
“While both articles discuss Alberta's potential separation from Canada, Article A focuses on the upcoming referendum vote and its implications, while Article B critiques Premier Danielle Smith's stance towards separatism.”
CBC News
⚖️ Leans right further left than this Hedges 2 of 37 claims Outlet record 74/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Alberta's separatist movement and referendum, not a single specific incident.”
Global News
Hedges 1 of 33 claims Outlet record 63/100
“The articles describe different aspects of Premier Danielle Smith's stance and actions regarding Alberta's future in Canada, but they do not report on the same specific incident or time.”
Toronto Star
Hedges 1 of 34 claims Outlet record 64/100
“While both articles mention Danielle Smith's speech at the virtual assembly, Article A focuses on her emotional plea and the list of indignities, while Article B critiques her motives and sympathy for separatists based on the content of the speech.”
The Globe and Mail
⚖️ Leans right further left than this Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 52/100
“Article A describes Danielle Smith's speech on September 19th about progress being made with Prime Minister Carney against separation, while Article B discusses perceived separatist sympathies based on a speech that sounds similar but is interpreted differently and dated two days later.”
The Globe and Mail
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 1 of 33 claims Outlet record 52/100
“The articles discuss related events but do not clearly describe the same specific incident or time frame.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
38
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
5%
2 of 38 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
64/100
Toronto Star's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-22 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Toronto Star · 11297 article(s) · 28 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 28 correction(s)
2026-10-26
Correction
2026-10-24
Correction
2026-10-07
Correction
2026-09-24
Correction

Who wrote this

Gillian Steward
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 It doesn’t promote the idea of staying in Canada and all the advantages that would entail.
2026-09-22 · assertive framing · Danielle Smith, your separatist sympathies are showing
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Alberta Albertans Canada Canadians a United Canada

Subjects

Alberta ORG · 9× Smith PERSON · 8× Canada GPE · 6× Albertans NORP · 2× Ottawa ORG · 2× Canadians NORP · 1× Danielle Smith PERSON · 1× U.S. GPE · 1× a United Canada GPE · 1× the Government of Alberta ORG · 1×

Narrative

After all the immigration questions — which focus on limiting provincial government services to temporary residents — and the constitutional questions were concocted after a series of travelling panels headed by Smith herself and featuring mostly friendly audiences.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-22
🔮 It doesn’t promote the idea of staying in Canada and all the advantages that would entail.
2026-09-22 · Toronto Star
Danielle Smith, your separatist sympathies are showing · assertive framing

Claims (38 extracted, 2 hedged)

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith says she is on Canada’s side in the upcoming Alberta separation referendum. asserted
she → say → referendum
Or is she still toying with Albertans and Canadians. asserted
she → toy → Albertans
It certainly sounded that way when she spoke last weekend at a virtual assembly on the future of Alberta. asserted
she → sound → Alberta
They’re hurt. asserted
They → hurt → ?
I hear it at town halls, in coffee shops, at hockey rinks and in my email inbox,” Smith said. asserted
Smith → hear → inbox
“When a proud, hardworking people feel their contribution is taken for granted and their livelihood is treated as something to be phased out, some begin to ask a painful question. asserted
some → feel → question
Does this country actually want us? asserted
country → want → us
And it isn’t just in her public addresses that she speaks that way. asserted
she → speak → addresses
It’s echoed in the provincial government’s $4 million advertising campaign about the referendum. asserted
It → echo → referendum
It doesn’t promote the idea of staying in Canada and all the advantages that would entail. asserted
that → promote → Canada
Instead, it shifts the focus to Alberta and exhorts voters to “Stand Up for a Strong and Sovereign Alberta within a United Canada.” asserted
it → shift → Canada
That could be interpreted in many different ways. uncertain
That → interpret → ways
And what does a “sovereign Alberta” mean anyway? asserted
Alberta → mean → what
The website then explains that Ottawa’s “destructive anti-Alberta policies” over the past 10 years led to the separation referendum. asserted
policies → explain → referendum
The nine immigration and constitutional questions to be voted on are also laid at the feet of the federal government. asserted
questions → vote → government
The “unsustainable” federal immigration policies led to temporary residents requiring an extra $1 billion in provincial health, education, and social services: No proof is offered before suggesting that those provincial services be limited for temporary residents. asserted
services → lead → residents
The website then proceeds to convince us to vote yes on the four immigration questions and the five constitutional questions. asserted
website → proceed → questions
No information about the opposing view is presented. asserted
information → oppose → view
Smith has fudged on how she intends to vote on the separation question. asserted
she → fudge → question
The separation question gives voters two options. asserted
question → give → options
Option 1: They can choose an outright “yes” to staying in Canada. asserted
They → choose → Canada
Option 2: Should the Government of Alberta commence the legal process required under the Canadian Constitution to hold a binding provincial referendum on whether or not Alberta should separate from Canada? asserted
Alberta → commence → Canada
Smith’s media relations director would not say which option the government is supporting. asserted
government → say → option
But at the virtual assembly Smith said she intends to vote yes to staying in Canada. asserted
she → say → Canada
And how will we ever know? asserted
we → know → ?
By hedging her bets Smith offers the separatists some hope in their ongoing fight to see Alberta become an independent country. asserted
Alberta → hedge → fight
True to form, Smith is not actually campaigning for a “yes” vote. asserted
Smith → campaign → vote
With less than month to go before the referendum she is not sporting a “Canada” banner, waving the red maple leaf or planning any large rallies. asserted
she → go → rallies
But surely the premier of a province who in her election campaign didn’t mention the word “separation” should be loyal to the country? asserted
word → mention → country
How can she even hold a referendum on separation without putting the idea forward during an election campaign? asserted
she → hold → campaign
Smacks of government manipulation The whole exercise smacks of government manipulation. asserted
exercise → smack → manipulation
After all the immigration questions — which focus on limiting provincial government services to temporary residents — and the constitutional questions were concocted after a series of travelling panels headed by Smith herself and featuring mostly friendly audiences. asserted
which → focus → audiences
Smith touts the Memorandum of Understanding between Alberta and Ottawa to build an oil pipeline to the B.C. coast as proof that Canada can work. asserted
Canada → tout → proof
It’s almost the only good thing she has to say about the federal government. asserted
she → ’ → government
“Why walk away from the table when we’re finally winning at it? asserted
we → walk → it
And to those who have always wanted to stay — staying should not mean settling. asserted
staying → want → those
A future federal government could undo all this progress that we’ve made with a stroke of a pen,” Smith said at the virtual assembly. uncertain
Smith → undo → assembly
Does that sound like someone who believes in Canada? Or someone ready to pull it apart? asserted
who → sound → it
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support