The Aporia · Today in Supreme Court History: September 22, 2005

Today in Supreme Court History: September 22, 2005

Read the original at Reason ↗

Cite

APA MLA Chicago

Blackman, J. (2026, September 22). Today in Supreme Court History: September 22, 2005. Reason. https://reason.com/volokh/2026/09/22/today-in-supreme-court-history-september-22-2005-7/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

AI analysis

Story summary

On September 22, 2005, the *Reason Magazine* highlighted an event from Supreme Court history without providing specific details about what transpired that day. The source does not offer any further context or significance of this date in relation to a particular case, decision, or notable occurrence involving justices. Given the lack of additional information and the absence of tagged topics or detected narratives, it's unclear why September 22 is noted as historically significant for the Supreme Court without more details being provided.

Written for “Supreme Court History” on 2026-11-04, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges an unknown share of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.

New Article: Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections: Bringing Clarity To The Necessary and Proper Clause Different event

Reason

⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 7 of 35 claims Outlet record 67/100

“The articles refer to different dates and contexts; one is an abstract about a court decision while the other appears to be historical commentary on Supreme Court events.”

Guns. Voting. Climate. Three Supreme Court cases will make or break originalism Different event

Washington Examiner

⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 4 of 47 claims Outlet record 69/100

“Article A discusses historical significance on a particular date, while Article B covers upcoming Supreme Court cases and their implications.”

A Few More Thoughts On The Missouri Ruling Different event

Reason

⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 2 of 44 claims Outlet record 67/100

“The articles refer to different time periods and contexts, with Article A summarizing historical Supreme Court events on a specific date while Article B discusses reflections on a ruling that occurred after the date mentioned in Article A.”

How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted

sentences that state something as happening or true

Uncertain

no claims

nothing to measure

Leaning

not political

takes no side on a contested political question

Publisher signals

67/100

Reason's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.

Outlets on this story

Politics

Same framing elsewhere

none derived

Analyzed 2026-09-25 · source text last changed 2026-09-25 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability

Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Reason · 1100 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected

Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)

2026-10-02

Would a Firing Squad Have Been More 'Humane' for Christa Pike?

2026-09-26

"I Will Not Stand for Being Jerked Around … by Any Lawyer Who Practices Before Me"

2026-09-18

New Article: Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections: Bringing Clarity To The Necessary and Proper Clause

2026-09-05

Lawyers' Responsibility for Hallucinations in Briefs That They Sign

Who wrote this

Josh Blackman

91 article(s) here · 0 carrying a prediction

🔮 And Kagan spared California the fate that befell Missouri, which had to file a pointless brief that no one would read.

2026-11-03 · assertive framing · Full Court Denies DOJ Petition In California Election Case In About 7 Hours, No Reply Needed

🔮 I thought it might be worthwhile to dig into the numbers a bit more.

2026-10-30 · assertive framing · Supreme Court Clerks Who Become Law Professors (2012-2026)

🔮 Today the law firm of Weil Gotshal announced that it would wind down.

2026-10-28 · assertive framing · Farewell to Weil

🔮 And her unwillingness to participate in any disciplinary proceedings suggests something is amiss.

2026-10-28 · assertive framing · The Bigger Problem With Judge Ada Brown's Woke Tirade: She Said The Quiet Part Out Loud About "White Saviors"

🔮 Longtime readers will recall that I took mileage runs to Singapore, Hong Kong, and Sydney to make status at the end of the year.

2026-10-28 · assertive framing · 1,000,000 Miles on United

🔮 Let's hope that people across the media industry will take Josh Blackman's criticism to heart.

2026-10-27 · assertive framing · The Wall Street Journal Praises The Old Gray Lady

🔮 New from Reason: a look into what Javier Milei has accomplished and what it will take to make the most of Argentina’s window for real change.

2026-10-26 · assertive framing · Today in Supreme Court History: October 26, 1774

🔮 ] There have been many news reports suggesting that the United States Department of Justice may pursue denaturalization proceedings against Representative Ilhan Omar.

2026-10-22 · mixed framing · What Happens to Representative Ilhan Omar's Congressional Seat if the United States Files Suit to Denaturalize Her?

🔮 Nevertheless, the next two decades would vastly enlarge the president's powers as Congress' authority over the executive branch would be greatly diminished.

2026-10-20 · assertive framing · New in SCOTUSBlog: "The separation and expansion of powers between Congress and the president"

🔮 Justice Sotomayor, Justice Gorsuch, Justice Barrett, and Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

2026-10-19 · mixed framing · Four Justices Recuse From Petition By Publishing Companies And New Grant on Disparate Impact

Also by Josh Blackman