A version of the below article first appeared in David Corn’s newsletter, Our Land.
asserted
version → appear → newsletter
The newsletter comes out twice a week (most of the time) and provides behind-the-scenes stories and articles about politics, media, and culture.
asserted
newsletter → come → politics
Subscribing costs just $5 a month—but you can sign up for a free 30-day trial.
asserted
you → cost → trial
The recent news from ProPublica that a Russian oligarch attended Donald Trump Jr.’s wedding celebration on a private island in the Bahamas and covered hundreds of thousands of dollars in costs for the lavish affair was not a surprise to anyone familiar with the main thrust of my new book, How Russia Won: Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin, and the Fight for America.
asserted
Russia → attend → America
The book chronicles the decade-long covert operation Putin has waged against the United States to sow discord, influence elections (to benefit Trump), and court Trump and his crew.
asserted
Putin → chronicle → Trump
An important fact in the wedding story is that Umar Kremlev, this oh-so generous oligarch, is not just another Russian billionaire who has to make nice with Putin to keep his fortune; he has been a key member of Putin’s security apparatus—truly the inner circle—and became an oligarch (and head of a corrupt international boxing organization) because of that.
asserted
he → have → that
In essence, a Putin operative infiltrated deep into the Trump clan.
asserted
operative → infiltrate → clan
This is not the first time Russia has attempted to squirm its way into Trump Jr.’s world.
asserted
Russia → attempt → world
During the 2016 campaign, Junior received a message from an associate who worked with the son of another Russian oligarch.
asserted
who → receive → oligarch
That contact informed Don Jr. that Moscow was plotting to secretly help Trump and wanted to send an emissary who had dirt on Hillary Clinton to meet with the Trump campaign.
asserted
who → inform → campaign
Trump Jr. replied, “If it’s what you say I love it.”
asserted
I → reply → it
The meeting soon happened, with Trump Jr., campaign chair Paul Manafort, and Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner present.
asserted
Jr. → happen → law
When the meeting was revealed—eight months after the election—Trump Jr. first lied about it, saying it was not related to the campaign, and then later claimed the emissary (who was tied to Russian intelligence) provided no useful derogatory information on Clinton.
asserted
who → reveal → Clinton
What was most important about the meeting was that it signaled to Moscow that the Trump camp was a-okay with Putin meddling in the election and that it made the Trump gang aware that the Kremlin intended to covertly mess in American politics to assist Trump.
asserted
Kremlin → signal → Trump
Still, Trump, Trump Jr., Manafort, and other Trumpers would loudly assert throughout the campaign and in the years afterward that Putin had not interfered.
asserted
Putin → assert → years
That is, they knowingly lied.
asserted
they → lie → ?
Which brings us to collusion.
asserted
Which → bring → collusion
Trump and his minions have contended that there was no collusion and, thus, no scandal, meaning the whole Russia investigation was a “hoax” and a Deep State “witch hunt” orchestrated to destroy Trump.
asserted
investigation → contend → Trump
Their definition of collusion basically rested on whether Trump or his lieutenants were in the same room with Russian hackers as they pilfered the documents from Democrats that would later be made public by WikiLeaks.
asserted
that → rest → WikiLeaks
No evidence of such collaboration emerged.
asserted
evidence → emerge → collaboration
So, they have vociferously argued ever since, there was no collusion.
asserted
they → argue → ?
The issue of collusion, naturally, has come up, as I’ve been doing media interviews about the new book.
asserted
I → come → book
It has long seemed to me that the meeting Trump Jr. set up and the subsequent denials from him and other Trump players—which echoed and affirmed Putin’s denials of interfering in the election—were a form of collusion.
asserted
which → seem → collusion
Team Trump was colluding with Putin’s attempted cover-up.
asserted
Trump → collude → up
Maybe Trump and his lieutenants weren’t involved in the hack-and-leak operation.
asserted
Trump → involve → operation
But they deliberately lied and provided cover for Putin.
asserted
they → lie → Putin
As I’ve been discussing all this in media interviews, I’ve made the point that perhaps the better term is complicity.
asserted
term → discuss → point
For 10 years, not just in 2016, Putin has been attacking US elections—the book details all this—and throughout that time, Trump has incessantly maintained that Moscow was doing nothing and that all claims otherwise were part of the Deep State’s bogus “Russia, Russia, Russia” conspiracy against him.
uncertain
claims → attack → him
That’s an act of profound betrayal.
asserted
That → ’ → betrayal
In the stretch following the 2016 election, Democrats and Trump critics were too fixated on collusion.
asserted
Democrats → follow → collusion
Now let’s go back to collusion.
asserted
’s → let → collusion
My book does have a chapter titled “Collusion,” and it digs into a 966-page bipartisan report on the Russian attack on the 2016 election that was produced by the Senate Intelligence Committee and released in August 2020.
asserted
that → have → August
This investigation offers the most comprehensive account of what transpired in 2016.
asserted
what → offer → 2016
One of the most intriguing portions of the report zeroes in on Manafort.
asserted
One → zero → Manafort
(Another very interesting section looks at whether the Kremlin obtained any compromising material on Trump.
asserted
Kremlin → look → Trump
In the Manafort passages, the committee—led at the time by a Republican senator named Marco Rubio—revealed that while he was chairing the Trump campaign, Manafort was interacting with and passing sensitive internal campaign data to Konstantin Kilimnik, a close business associate who was also a Russian intelligence officer.
asserted
who → lead → Kilimnik
And, the report noted, Kilimnik had connections to the Russian military intelligence unit that ran the hack-and-leak operation that targeted the Clinton campaign.
asserted
that → note → campaign
Moreover, the report noted that committee investigators had uncovered “two pieces of information” that “raise the possibility of Manafort’s potential connection to the hack-and-leak operations.”
asserted
that → note → operations
The report’s description of this information was redacted, as was much text about Kilimnik.
asserted
text → redact → Kilimnik
In my reporting for the book, I learned that the redacted portions disclosed that Kilimnik was an agent for the GRU, the Russian intelligence outfit that ran the hack-and-leak attack—a fact buttressing the possibility that Kilimnik was involved in or aware of that operation when he was in communication with Manafort.
asserted
he → learn → Manafort
…and 9 more, not listed.
The Aporia
