Photo via Dawn

India cannot ‘set aside’ international obligations when inconvenient, says Dar on New Delhi’s unilateral move against IWT

Read the original at Dawn ↗
Cite

News Desk. (2026, September 23). India cannot ‘set aside’ international obligations when inconvenient, says Dar on New Delhi’s unilateral move against IWT. Dawn. https://www.dawn.com/news/2032046/india-cannot-set-aside-international-obligations-when-inconvenient-says-dar-on-new-delhis-unilateral-move-against-iwt

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Dawn · collected 2026-09-23 · by News Desk

Quick Summary

Ishaq Dar, Pakistan’s Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister, criticized India for unilaterally suspending the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) in April 2024, a move that led to military tensions between the two nations in May 2025. In August, the Permanent Court of Arbitration ruled against India, confirming that the treaty remains fully enforceable and lacks provisions for unilateral suspension. Speaking at an OIC meeting on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in New York, Dar emphasized that international obligations cannot be disregarded when they become inconvenient.
Written by AI on 2026-09-23, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In August 2025, Pakistan's Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar addressed the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) Contact Group on Jammu and Kashmir at the 81st session of the UN General Assembly in New York. He emphasized that India could not unilaterally suspend the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), a binding international agreement, due to its inconvenient nature. In April 2025, India had suspended the IWT, which led to a brief military conflict between the two countries in May 2025 following an attack in Pahalgam, occupied Kashmir. The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) subsequently ruled that India lacked justification for suspending or ending the treaty, reaffirming its full validity. Dar stressed that international obligations cannot be disregarded when they become inconvenient, highlighting Pakistan's commitment to upholding the IWT despite recent tensions with India.

Written for “India IWT Issue” on 2026-11-02, grounded in this article and the 1 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 India IWT Issue
Politics · 2 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 40% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Dawn
Hedges 3 of 30 claims Outlet record 72/100
“Article A discusses Dar's statement regarding India setting aside international obligations related to the Indus Waters Treaty, while Article B covers Prime Minister Sharif's speech at UNGA about treating water diversion as an act of war. Though both are related to the same issue, they describe different specific events.”
The Hindu
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 2 of 25 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles cover different events: one discusses Pakistan's response to India's unilateral move against the Indus Waters Treaty, while the other reports on India criticizing Pakistan at the UN.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
5
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
40%
2 of 5 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
72/100
Dawn's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
2
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-23 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Dawn · 2560 article(s) · 3 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 3 correction(s)

Who wrote this

News Desk
353 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Governor Faisal Karim Kundi had condemned the firing, asserting that Pakistan would “never tolerate” attacks on its people or violations of its sovereignty.
🔮 Lt Gen Chaudhry then recalled that during the May 2025 conflict with India, Pakistan had shot down dozens of highly sophisticated drones sent from across the eastern border.
🔮 Lt Gen Chaudhry then recalled that during the May 2025 conflict with India, Pakistan had shot down dozens of highly sophisticated drones sent from across the eastern border.
🔮 Lt Gen Chaudhry then recalled that during the May 2025 conflict with India, Pakistan had shot down dozens of highly sophisticated drones sent from across the eastern border.
🔮 A PIA spokesperson at the time said the addition of the Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner would mark the start of the airline’s expansion.
🔮 He added that such an approach would enable “developing and low-income economies to move beyond crisis management towards sustainable growth”.
🔮 US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said that Washington has “heard” Pakistan’s concerns about terrorism emanating from Afghanistan and if “there’s a productive role for us to play, we would play it”.
🔮 In its statement, the information ministry said the Afghan spokesman’s remarks expose the “regime’s deeply misguided approach and unwillingness to confront the root cause of deteriorating relations with Pakistan”.
🔮 In July 2025, a steering committee tasked with developing the Greater Karachi Regional Plan 2047 was informed that the new master plan of the country’s commercial capital would be ready within two years.
🔮 A day earlier, he said that the wording of the pact did not bar new members after being asked about whether Iran could join the agreement.
Wire or desk byline, not an individual reporter.
Also by News Desk
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 353 articles by News Desk →

Topics

India New Delhi PCA the Indus Waters Treaty the Permanent Court of Arbitration

Subjects

India GPE · 3× Ishaq Dar PERSON · 1× Jammu and Kashmir GPE · 1× New Delhi GPE · 1× New York GPE · 1× OIC ORG · 1× PCA ORG · 1× the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation ORG · 1× the Permanent Court of Arbitration ORG · 1× the UN General Assembly ORG · 1×

Narrative

In his address at the ministerial meeting of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) Contact Group on Jammu and Kashmir on the sidelines of the 81st session of the UN General Assembly in New York, Dar said: “The treaty is a binding international agreement and contains no provision permitting its unilateral suspension.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-23
🔮 Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar said on Wednesday that India could not set aside its international obligations when they became inconvenient, stressing that the status of the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) had been reaffirmed by a court of arbitration.

Claims (5 extracted, 2 hedged)

Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar said on Wednesday that India could not set aside its international obligations when they became inconvenient, stressing that the status of the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) had been reaffirmed by a court of arbitration. uncertain
status → say → arbitration
India unilaterally suspended the accord in April last year — a move that was followed by a brief military conflict between the two sides in May 2025. uncertain
that → suspend → May
In August, the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA), in a setback to New Delhi, declared that the treaty between the two countries remained fully in force, as India had no justification for ending or suspending the agreement. asserted
India → declare → agreement
In his address at the ministerial meeting of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) Contact Group on Jammu and Kashmir on the sidelines of the 81st session of the UN General Assembly in New York, Dar said: “The treaty is a binding international agreement and contains no provision permitting its unilateral suspension. asserted
treaty → say → suspension
“International obligations can’t be set aside when they become inconvenient.” asserted
they → set → ?
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support