Photo via Washington Examiner

The media forgot about Panama — Trump didn’t. Now we’re evicting China from the canal

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Wargotz, E. (2026, September 23). The media forgot about Panama — Trump didn’t. Now we’re evicting China from the canal. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/op-eds/4735632/trump-us-evicting-china-panama-canal/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-09-23 · by Eric Wargotz

Quick Summary

The Trump administration has taken significant steps to reduce Chinese influence near the Panama Canal by leveraging diplomatic and legal pressure. Secretary of State Marco Rubio issued an ultimatum during his tour of Central America that China's presence in key port infrastructure violated the 1977 Torrijos-Carter Treaties, which mandate neutrality for the canal. Following this, Panama’s Supreme Court annulled a long-standing concession held by the Chinese company CK Hutchison Holdings at critical ports near the canal entrances. This move has allowed Western logistics operators to purchase controlling stakes in these ports, effectively pushing out state-run Chinese entities from strategic positions along the waterway.
Written by AI on 2026-09-23, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In its first six months, the Trump administration signaled a shift in foreign policy towards securing the Panama Canal by excluding Chinese influence and prioritizing regional security under a modern interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. Despite media silence on this issue, Washington has intensified legal, economic, and military efforts to protect the canal from Chinese expansion. Secretary of State Marco Rubio delivered an ultimatum to Panama City, demanding actions that would restrict China’s presence in the region. This move reflects a strategic shift towards safeguarding critical infrastructure within the Western Hemisphere rather than focusing on peripheral global theaters. Panama's leaders have made it clear they will not allow permanent U.S. military bases, rejecting any notion of surrendering control over their national asset.

Written for “Panama Canal Dispute China Us” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Panama Canal Dispute China Us
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 1 of 39 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss different policy shifts under the Trump administration: one about evicting China from the Panama Canal and the other about a campaign against Havana, Cuba.”
National Post
⚖️ Leans right further left than this Hedges 16 of 49 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different topics: Article A focuses on diplomatic actions regarding the Panama Canal, while Article B discusses a meeting between Trump and Xi Jinping focusing on trade tensions.”
Al Jazeera
Hedges 6 of 63 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different events; one focuses on a diplomatic shift regarding the Panama Canal and the other on a trade truce extension between the US and China.”
South China Morning Post
Hedges 0 of 5 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles discuss different topics and events related to foreign policy but do not describe the same specific incident.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 5 of 38 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of diplomatic activities; Article A focuses on actions regarding the Panama Canal, while Article B discusses a broader week in diplomacy with Trump's interactions at the UN and with China.”
South China Morning Post
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 0 of 8 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles discuss different topics - one focuses on the US taking action regarding China at the Panama Canal, while the other is about a speech made by Trump at the United Nations General Assembly.”
CBC News
Hedges 1 of 32 claims Outlet record 74/100
“The articles discuss different topics: one is about evicting China from the Panama Canal, while the other covers a U.S.-China summit on trade policy.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right further left than this Hedges 0 of 48 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of U.S. foreign policy shifts towards Latin America but do not describe the same specific incident.”
Fox News
Hedges 4 of 32 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss related topics but refer to distinct events and contexts.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
42
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 42 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
70/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-23 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 3851 article(s) · 7 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 7 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Eric Wargotz
44 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The timing of this rapidly unfolding development could not be more dangerous.
🔮 But right now, all these conflicting voices in his ear, the domestic polling, and the foreign pressure might just be clouding his judgment.
🔮 A highly active, independent 85-year-old with multiple risk factors might experience significant, long-term survival benefits from continuous lipid management.
🔮 When we — whether ordinary citizens or high-level officials — flirt with systemic collapse simply because we despise the current administration, we play with a fire that will consume everyone.
🔮 National surveys published by the Pew Research Center Climate Pessimism Study document that roughly 60% of Americans express deep anxiety that global actors will fail to mitigate the worst environmental impacts due to political division.
2026-10-09 · assertive framing · The climate war’s dumbest lie: Jobs vs. nature
🔮 If your only window into the American soul is the nightly cable news broadcast, you would assume we are a nation completely irreconcilable, locked in a permanent cultural cold war.
🔮 Meanwhile, Trump boldly cut through the bureaucratic panic, signaling that the White House has no appetite for heavy-handed domestic regulations that would cripple our edge and stating that our primary guardrails remain the rule of law and the Department of Justice.
🔮 When we look at this disparity under the microscope, we find that it is neither a failure of individual willpower nor a consequence of an isolated genetic pool.
🔮 Every single time I hit “send” on a new draft, a cynical voice in my head asks the exact same questions: Will the editor accept this, as they’re overwhelmed with tons of these a day?
🔮 You cannot hide behind an ideological playbook or an army of insulated advisers when a budget needs balancing or a project stalls; your neighbors will call you out at the local hardware store.
Also by Eric Wargotz
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 44 articles by Eric Wargotz →

Topics

Beijing Chinese European Washington the Monroe Doctrine

Subjects

Washington GPE · 4× American NORP · 3× Chinese NORP · 3× Beijing GPE · 2× Panama GPE · 2× Panamanian NORP · 2× the State Department ORG · 2× European NORP · 1× Panama City GPE · 1× Trump PERSON · 1×

Narrative

The Trump administration openly acknowledges that these newly diverted funds are intended to purchase American military hardware specifically designed to secure the canal zone right now, signaling a ruthless prioritization of the immediate American hemisphere over peripheral global theaters.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-23
🔮 Panama’s leaders have explicitly stated to local media that they will not tolerate permanent U.S. military bases, flatly rejecting any public perception that they have ceded sovereign control of their crown jewel.

Claims (42 extracted, 0 hedged)

National newsrooms have developed a dangerous blind spot at our own doorstep: the Panama Canal. asserted
newsrooms → develop → doorstep
While the legacy media remain utterly consumed by a predictable loop of domestic political theater and European updates, a major foreign policy shift is actively reshaping the Western Hemisphere, completely unremarked. asserted
shift → remain → Hemisphere
Within its first six months in office, the Trump administration signaled a sharp reversal of previous diplomatic passivity in the region. asserted
administration → signal → region
Operating under a modernized interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine, Washington has quietly engaged in intense legal, economic, and military maneuvering to secure the waterway and systematically exclude Chinese influence. asserted
Washington → operate → influence
Despite a glaring media blackout, these actions are fundamentally upending regional security today. asserted
actions → upend → security
The canal has transformed into a primary, active theater of great power competition. asserted
canal → transform → competition
It is a live, sophisticated masterclass in infrastructure denial and supply chain security that the press have entirely failed to cover. asserted
press → fail → that
The initial offensive began with a sharp diplomatic ultimatum delivered straight to Panama City. asserted
offensive → begin → City
Secretary of State Marco Rubio used an official tour of Central America to lay down Washington’s new parameters, telling Panamanian President Jose Raul Mulino that China’s commercial presence near the canal was entirely unacceptable. asserted
presence → use → canal
Specifically, the administration asserted that Chinese state-linked firms dominating key port infrastructure violated the strict neutrality terms of the landmark 1977 Torrijos-Carter Treaties. asserted
firms → assert → Treaties
Under that agreement, the canal must remain secure, neutral, and fair to global maritime transit. asserted
canal → remain → transit
By framing Beijing’s footprint as a treaty breach, the State Department established a potent legal lever. asserted
Department → frame → lever
Washington continues to use this leverage today, quietly threatening to reconsider the fundamental terms of the canal’s handover if preferential treatment to foreign adversaries persists. asserted
treatment → continue → adversaries
This sustained pressure quickly yielded a massive, yet completely underreported, economic and legal victory that is still reshaping local commerce. asserted
that → yield → commerce
Following intense backchannel coordination with Washington, Panama’s Supreme Court moved to annul a long-standing port concession held by the Hong Kong-based shipping conglomerate CK Hutchison Holdings. asserted
Court → follow → conglomerate
The conglomerate had operated the critical Balboa and Cristobal terminals at the literal mouths of the canal for nearly 30 years. asserted
conglomerate → operate → years
This gave Beijing a strategic commercial foothold at both ends of the global chokepoint. asserted
This → give → chokepoint
The Supreme Court’s sudden judicial ruling successfully dismantled this infrastructure monopoly and created an immediate operational vacuum. asserted
ruling → dismantle → vacuum
Today, Western logistics operators and American-backed capital are actively occupying that breach, having purchased a controlling stake in the vital ports to lock state-run Chinese entities out of the canal’s physical entrances. asserted
operators → back → entrances
To cement this economic eviction, the Pentagon is simultaneously deploying a visible, forward-leaning physical deterrence on the ground. asserted
Pentagon → cement → ground
U.S. Southern Command recently escalated this presence by shifting the massive Panamax 2026 joint military exercises out of simulated computer classrooms and back into the field as a live operational deployment for the first time since 2012. asserted
Command → escalate → 2012
Over 1,700 military personnel from 19 nations have descended upon Panamanian-controlled facilities, sending an unmistakable, real-time message regarding American hard power in the zone. asserted
personnel → descend → zone
This active deployment is legally backed by a recently finalized security agreement that permits a rotational joint presence of American personnel inside the country, establishing the largest physical U.S. military footprint in Panama seen in over a decade. asserted
that → back → decade
The Trump administration’s focus on the canal is further evidenced by a radical, real-time restructuring of foreign assistance funding that has completely escaped mainstream journalistic scrutiny. asserted
that → evidence → scrutiny
The State Department recently notified Congress that it is diverting $52 million in foreign military financing away from traditional security allies in Europe and the Middle East, including Slovakia, Iraq, and Tunisia. asserted
it → notify → Slovakia
This taxpayer funding is being redirected to Panama and a select handful of neighboring regional allies to bolster immediate maritime and border security infrastructure. asserted
funding → redirect → infrastructure
The Trump administration openly acknowledges that these newly diverted funds are intended to purchase American military hardware specifically designed to secure the canal zone right now, signaling a ruthless prioritization of the immediate American hemisphere over peripheral global theaters. asserted
funds → acknowledge → theaters
Unsurprisingly, this aggressive posture is triggering significant political blowback within Panama, exposing the deep friction between vital American security mandates and Panamanian sovereignty as events unfold. asserted
events → trigger → mandates
While the U.S. Embassy in Panama continuously frames these joint measures as collaborative, Mulino and Security Minister Frank Abrego are struggling to manage a highly sensitive domestic audience. asserted
Mulino → frame → audience
Panama’s leaders have explicitly stated to local media that they will not tolerate permanent U.S. military bases, flatly rejecting any public perception that they have ceded sovereign control of their crown jewel. asserted
they → state → jewel
For a sovereign nation, the fear of American overreach is compounded by severe, immediate economic retaliation from Beijing, which has just begun subjecting Panama-flagged vessels to unprecedented surges in detentions and highly aggressive, punitive inspections in Chinese ports. asserted
which → compound → ports
Navigating this delicate landscape requires the United States to carefully reconcile its essential national security interests with Panama’s independence in the present day. asserted
Navigating → navigate → day
A purely heavy-handed approach risks alienating a crucial regional partner and stoking historical anti-American sentiment. asserted
approach → risk → sentiment
Moving forward, Washington must look to a model of structured compromise, utilizing parallel strategic negotiations like the Trump administration’s recent agreements with Denmark regarding Greenland as an active blueprint. asserted
Washington → move → blueprint
The U.S. must treat Panama as a sovereign ally rather than a subordinate territory. asserted
U.S. → treat → ally
Framing the redirected $52 million in military financing as an immediate tool to empower Panama’s own forces to counter narco-terrorism and protect global shipping allows the U.S. to successfully fortify the canal zone while explicitly respecting the local chain of command. asserted
U.S. → frame → command
Ultimately, American statecraft must demonstrate that a close alliance with Washington guarantees Panama’s long-term safety and economic viability far better than capitulating to Beijing’s commercial encirclement. asserted
alliance → demonstrate → encirclement
The struggle for global maritime supremacy is actively being won right now in our own backyard through a sophisticated combination of legal warfare, economic infrastructure denial, and forward-deployed military deterrence. asserted
struggle → win → warfare
National security and state sovereignty do not need to be mutually exclusive concepts in the Americas. asserted
security → need → Americas
However, achieving both will require the administration to refine its language away from the rhetoric of taking back the canal toward a strategy of shared, respectful hemispheric defense — even if the legacy media remain too blind to report it. asserted
media → achieve → it
…and 2 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support