Photo via Reason

Privacy Lawsuit Over Prof's Book That Mentions Former TA's Childhood Sexual Abuse Can Go Forward

Read the original at Reason ↗
Cite

Volokh, E. (2026, September 23). Privacy Lawsuit Over Prof's Book That Mentions Former TA's Childhood Sexual Abuse Can Go Forward. Reason. https://reason.com/volokh/2026/09/23/privacy-lawsuit-over-profs-book-that-mentions-former-tas-childhood-sexual-abuse-can-go-forward/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Reason · collected 2026-09-23 · by Eugene Volokh
Content note This article describes sexual violence and abuse of a child.

Quick Summary

Judge Mary Kay Costello ruled that Jonathan McCausland's lawsuit against Penn State University can proceed. The case centers on Jeanine Staples-Dixon, a tenured professor at Penn State who published a book in 2024 disclosing details about McCausland’s childhood sexual abuse without his consent. In the summer of 2018 and subsequent years, McCausland shared this sensitive information with Staples-Dixon and her seminar participants under an agreement of confidentiality. However, these details were included in Staples-Dixon's published book, leading to legal action over privacy violations.
Written by AI on 2026-09-23, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In April 2024, a judge ruled that a lawsuit against Penn State University over a professor's book mentioning a former teaching assistant's childhood sexual abuse could proceed. Plaintiff Jonathan McCausland had worked as a TA for Professor Jeanine Staples-Dixon’s Philadelphia Urban Seminar in summer 2018, where he was instructed to share personal stories of vulnerability, including his history of sexual abuse as a child. The seminar required students and TAs to sign confidentiality agreements stating that shared information would remain confidential and anonymized if used in publications.

Despite the confidentiality agreement, Staples-Dixon's 2024 book revealed details about McCausland’s childhood trauma without permission, leading him to sue for invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The court dismissed claims against Penn State based on an employer liability theory, stating that Pennsylvania law does not hold employers liable for the intentional torts of their employees unless those acts occur within the course and scope of employment. However, Judge Mary Kay Costello allowed McCausland's suit to proceed directly against Staples-Dixon.

Written for “Privacy Lawsuit Academic Freedom” on 2026-11-04, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Privacy Lawsuit Academic Freedom
Education · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 12% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Reason
Hedges 5 of 33 claims Outlet record 67/100
“The articles describe different legal cases involving privacy and disclosure of personal information, but they are not reporting on the same specific incident.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
77
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
12%
9 of 77 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
67/100
Reason's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Education
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-23 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Reason · 1100 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Eugene Volokh
192 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 In May 2025, Harvard revoked Plaintiff's tenure and terminated her appointment with HBS.
🔮 The requirement would hold DSPs liable for their failure to adhere to state-set publication standards, not only "treat[ing] [them] as … publisher[s] or speaker[s]," but treating them as publishers subject to sweeping state controls.
🔮 From Sanchez v. Almond, decided Wednesday by Judge John McConnell (D.R.I.): Mr. Sanchez began working at the office of Rhode Island Governor Daniel J. McKee in May 2021 as a "constituent services" staffer.
🔮 Beauchamp believed that the post appeared to condone murder based on the victim's political viewpoints and statements and became concerned that this post and perception would reflect on GCAO in the public's eyes and thereby undermine the public's trust in GCAO's official duty to prosecute homicides without bias and without regard to a victim's views, statements, or affiliations.
2026-11-02 · assertive framing · Firing for "Rot in Hell Charlie Kirk" Post Upheld
🔮 After Judge Covington announced that she would be denying McClain's suppression motion, Outlaw stood up and said "the judge is a cocksucker" loud enough for Judge Covington to hear.
🔮 According to the Complaint, in August 2024, Plaintiffs and other District community members learned that then-member of the Board of School Directors of Souderton Area School District (the "Board") William Formica posted lewd comments on social media about Vice President Kamala Harris, disparaging teachers and non-English speakers, and deriding diversity programs.
🔮 Some excerpts from the long First Superseding Indictment in U.S. v. Hakim (E.D. Mich.), filed Oct. 21, alleging conspiracy to transmit threats in interstate commerce as well as, for two defendants, witness intimidation and destruction of property to prevent seizure (8 of the 12 defendants had originally been indicted in May); the targets included UM officials and businesses connected with them, as well as the Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Detroit:
🔮 Because "[t]he costs and efforts required to defend a lawsuit through [discovery] could chill free speech nearly as effectively as the absence of the actual malice standard altogether[,]" a public figure plaintiff must plausibly allege actual malice at the outset of the litigation.
🔮 The First Amendment forbids a State from using its investigative power that way, and I will not allow it while this case is pending.
🔮 The same logic could apply to nuns who had felt religious pressure to do the educational or nursing work that their order was known for, or to monks who had felt religious pressure to do agricultural work that supports the monastery.
2026-10-30 · assertive framing · Amicus Brief in OneTaste Criminal Prosecution
Also by Eugene Volokh
Open Thread
2026-11-03 · Reason
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 192 articles by Eugene Volokh →

Topics

E.D. Pa. Penn State Penn. Staples-Dixon State Univ

Subjects

Staples-Dixon PERSON · 8× Plaintiff PERSON · 7× Penn State ORG · 3× E.D. Pa. GPE · 1× Jonathan McCausland PERSON · 1× Mary Kay Costello PERSON · 1× McCausland PERSON · 1× Penn State University ORG · 1× Penn. GPE · 1× State Univ ORG · 1×

Narrative

And the court held that Penn State couldn't be liable for either tort on an employer liability (respondeat superior) theory: "[U]nder Pennsylvania law, an employer generally cannot be held liable for the intentional torts of its employees." To hold an employer vicariously liable for an employee's intentional tort, the employee's act must have occurred within the course and scope of employment.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-23
🔮 The forms stated that all information shared in class would be confidential, would not be shared outside the classroom without permission, and would be anonymized in the event of publication.

Claims (77 extracted, 9 hedged)

In 2024, Jeanine Staples-Dixon, a tenured professor at Penn State, published a book that disclosed Plaintiff's childhood sexual abuse…. asserted
that → publish → abuse
In 2018, Plaintiff began working as a TA for Professor Staples-Dixon's Philadelphia Urban Seminar at Penn State. asserted
Plaintiff → begin → State
This yearly seminar was held in the summer for a small number of students. asserted
seminar → hold → students
As part of the course, Staples-Dixon instructed her TAs to share their "gender stories." asserted
Dixon → instruct → stories
She explained that extreme vulnerability "was an essential part of the pedagogical value of the seminar," and she wanted her TAs to model that vulnerability for her students. asserted
TAs → explain → students
To facilitate open and honest communication among seminar participants, every student was required to complete several intake forms pertaining to confidentiality. asserted
student → facilitate → confidentiality
The forms stated that all information shared in class would be confidential, would not be shared outside the classroom without permission, and would be anonymized in the event of publication. asserted
information → state → publication
Neither Staples-Dixon nor the TAs signed the confidentiality forms. asserted
Dixon → sign → forms
During the summer 2018 seminar, Plaintiff shared a gender story relating to how competition and athletics shaped his ideas of masculinity. asserted
competition → share → masculinity
However, Plaintiff felt that this story was "insufficiently vulnerable when compared to the highly personal gender stories share by other" TAs. asserted
story → feel → TAs
During a planning session for the 2019 seminar, Plaintiff shared with Staples-Dixon that he had been sexually abused as a child by older boys who lived in his neighborhood. asserted
who → share → neighborhood
Staples-Dixon encouraged Plaintiff to share his story with seminar participants because it revealed the exact kind of extreme vulnerability that she wanted to discuss in the course. asserted
she → encourage → course
Trusting the norms of confidentiality in the seminar and the agreements signed by every student, Plaintiff agreed. asserted
Plaintiff → trust → student
With Staples-Dixon's encouragement, Plaintiff continued to share his sexual abuse with seminar participants during the 2020, 2021, and 2022 sessions. asserted
Plaintiff → continue → sessions
Plaintiff graduated from Penn State in 2022. asserted
Plaintiff → graduate → 2022
In December 2024, Staples-Dixon published "Extraordinary Pedagogies: An Endarkened Feminist Approach to Revolutionizing Teacher Consciousness" through Teachers College Press. asserted
Dixon → publish → Press
She based the book on the research she conducted during the seminar. asserted
she → base → seminar
The book included the following passage recounting Plaintiff's sexual abuse: asserted
book → include → abuse
Dr. JD McCausland talked about the sexual molestation he endured with his childhood best friend, perpetuated by a group of older, bigger teenage boys. asserted
he → talk → boys
He talked about the confusion, anger fear, and stress he endured via the abuse and how he felt tortured in his gender identity and sexual orientation until he generated the strength to claim his identify for himself as a straight, cis man. uncertain
he → talk → man
Telling these stories means locating your power. asserted
Telling → tell → power
This is a feat, especially when one's gender identity, expression, and sexual orientation are crippled and corrupted by sexism, misogyny, and misogynoir…. asserted
identity → cripple → sexism
When Plaintiff learned of the book in late February 2025, he felt betrayed. asserted
he → learn → February
Staples-Dixon never sought Plaintiff's consent to publish his story, and he was particularly shocked by the fact that Staples-Dixon referenced him by name and professional title. asserted
Dixon → seek → name
The court allowed plaintiff's disclosure of private facts claim to go forward (the Pennsylvania term for the tort is "publicity given to private life"): uncertain
term → allow → life
"To state a claim for publicity given to private life, a plaintiff must allege that the matter publicized is '(1) publicity, given to (2) private facts, (3) which would be highly offensive to a reasonable person, and (4) is not of legitimate concern to the public.'" uncertain
which → state → public
… "A private fact is one that has not already been made public." asserted
that → make → ?
A fact is made public "by communicating it to the public at large, or to so many persons that the matter must be regarded as substantially certain to become one of public knowledge." asserted
matter → make → knowledge
However, "disclosures to a small number of persons do not" make a fact public…. asserted
fact → make → persons
Here, Plaintiff's disclosures to seminar participants were not substantially certain to make his experiences public knowledge. asserted
experiences → make → participants
Plaintiff shared his sexual abuse with students during the seminar from 2019 to 2022. asserted
Plaintiff → share → 2022
Each student completed an intake form stating that information shared in the course was confidential and would not be shared outside the classroom without permission. asserted
information → complete → permission
Although Staples-Dixon emphasizes that neither she nor the other TAs signed that form, Plaintiff is entitled to an inference that the form and sensitive subject matter discussed in the seminar created an expectation of confidentiality. asserted
form → emphasize → confidentiality
Indeed, even if Staples-Dixon and the other TAs could have discussed that information outside of the seminar, Plaintiff's disclosure to them did not make it substantially certain that his past abuse would become public knowledge. uncertain
abuse → discuss → them
Given this context, Plaintiff has plausibly alleged that his sexual abuse was a private fact despite his disclosures to seminar participants…. asserted
abuse → give → participants
The court also allowed plaintiff's intentional infliction of emotional distress claim to go forward: "'Liability on an intentional infliction of emotional distress claim has been found only where the conduct has been so outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency, and to be regarded as atrocious, and utterly intolerable in a civilized community.'" uncertain
conduct → allow → community
Here, a reasonable fact finder could determine that Staples-Dixon's publication of Plaintiff's sexual abuse was extreme and outrageous. uncertain
publication → determine → abuse
She published one of "the most private and personal aspects of Plaintiff's life." asserted
She → publish → life
And Plaintiff shared with Staples-Dixon and other seminar participants that "this abuse had caused him lifelong struggles related to trust, relationships, intimacy, and identity." asserted
abuse → share → trust
In fact, Plaintiff alleged that Staples-Dixon encouraged him to share his story precisely for that reason—"to model the extreme vulnerability called for by the Seminar's pedagogy." asserted
Dixon → allege → pedagogy
…and 37 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support