A £1 million Ponzi scheme “mastermind” who led a gang of fraudsters using aliases inspired by films and TV shows to con victims out of their cash has been jailed for more than five years.
asserted
who → lead → years
James Gillingham’s “brokers” posed as characters including Harvey Specter from US legal drama Suits and Jonathan Hart from crime series Hart To Hart as they cold-called people into handing over their savings between June 2015 and October 2016.
asserted
they → pose → June
One victim, who invested more than £35,000, said: “The investment was supposed to be our life boat, instead it was our Titanic.”
asserted
it → invest → 35,000
Another, who lost more than £3,000, said he felt “terrible” after recommending the investment to his family, who also lost savings.
asserted
who → lose → savings
Read More
A different victim said that losing more than £45,000 had set their life back by five or six years.
asserted
losing → read → years
But investigators found the Canary Wharf “office” was merely a mail-forwarding address, while only one desk was leased at the Gherkin.
asserted
desk → find → Gherkin
More than 60 victims handed over a total of £1 million after being promised guaranteed monthly returns of between 0.5% and 5%, depending on how much they invested, as well as a profit after 12 months.
asserted
they → hand → months
The largest amount taken from a single victim was £133,900.
asserted
amount → take → victim
But none of the £1 million was actually invested, according to City of London Police, and while some victims received investment income, none got back their full investment or made any profit
uncertain
none → invest → profit
, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said.
asserted
Service → say → ?
Gillingham was instead running a Ponzi scheme in which money was used to fund staff payments, business overheads and dividend payments to existing investors rather than generating profits through genuine trading activity.
asserted
money → run → activity
Those working for his companies, Choice Option and Blue Crest Capital Options, used aggressive tactics to persuade people to invest, including pleading with them and accusing reluctant victims of wasting traders’ time, prosecutors said.
asserted
prosecutors → work → time
About £650,000 was used to pay staff, including more than £200,000 to Gillingham himself and more than £70,000 to Sujanthan Sotheeswaran, labelled his “lieutenant” by Judge Martin Griffith.
asserted
650,000 → use → Griffith
Investors were paid £167,681 in supposed “dividends”, while around £170,000 went towards office costs and other running expenses.
By October 2016, investors could no longer access their online accounts, contact company staff or withdraw their funds.
Gillingham tried to secure bail using a fake tenancy agreement for a rental property.
The judge told him: “I consider that it was your fraud and you handled the money.
uncertain
you → pay → money
He added: “This has been described throughout as a £1 million fraud.
asserted
This → add → fraud
“That is a reference to the loss caused.
asserted
That → cause → loss
“As a Ponzi fraud there was a need to attract further investors to allow sums to be repaid to keep original investors sweet.
asserted
sums → be → investors
“The effect of the evidence was that fresh investors were always being sought throughout the operational period.”
asserted
investors → seek → period
The judge added that Gillingham had had a “chequered history while on the run”.
asserted
Gillingham → add → run
Three others involved in the scheme had already been sentenced in 2024.
asserted
others → involve → 2024
Sotheeswaran was jailed at the same court for three years and Denis Deegan for two years and eight months, while Darren Peck was given a 21-month sentence suspended for two years, City of London Police said.
asserted
Police → jail → London
Financial investigator Hayley Wade, from the force, said: “James Gillingham was the driving force behind a sophisticated investment fraud that caused significant financial losses to victims.
asserted
that → say → victims
“While his co-defendants were brought to justice in 2024, Gillingham remained outside the UK and attempted to avoid facing the consequences of his actions.”
asserted
Gillingham → bring → actions
Kate Hurst, from the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), said: “While James Gillingham’s prison sentence brings one chapter to a close, we must remember the victims who continue to live with the consequences of his fraud.”
The CPS will seek to recover any criminal assets held by Gillingham under the Proceeds of Crime Act and try to pass the proceeds to his victims as compensation.
asserted
CPS → say → compensation
The Aporia
