The Aporia
Qurashi, N. (2026, September 23). Judge was wrong to hear case from his bed while recovering from surgery, Court of Appeal finds. Daily Mail. https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16155055/judge-wrong-hear-case-bed-surgery-Court-Appeal.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490
Qurashi, Noor. “Judge was wrong to hear case from his bed while recovering from surgery, Court of Appeal finds.” Daily Mail, 23 Sept. 2026, https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16155055/judge-wrong-hear-case-bed-surgery-Court-Appeal.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490.
Qurashi, Noor. “Judge was wrong to hear case from his bed while recovering from surgery, Court of Appeal finds.” Daily Mail, September 23, 2026. https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16155055/judge-wrong-hear-case-bed-surgery-Court-Appeal.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490.
Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.
In April 2023, Richard Clayton KC, sitting as a deputy High Court judge, heard an appeal via video link while recovering from surgery for a ruptured Achilles tendon in his bed. The case involved Suleman Patel, an optometrist facing a nine-month suspension imposed by the General Optical Council. Despite difficulty navigating PDF documents and advised not to stand up for eight days post-surgery, Clayton dismissed Patel’s appeal.
Patel appealed this decision to the Court of Appeal, arguing that the judgment was unjust due to Clayton's compromised condition. On Tuesday, Lord Justice Phillips and Lady Justice Falk ruled in favor of rejecting Patel’s appeal but also stated that it was improper for Clayton to hear the case from his bed unless under exceptional circumstances.
The court emphasized that while Clayton's willingness and fortitude were commendable, judges must have essential tools and professionalism to perform their duties adequately.