Photo via NPR

Under Trump, NIH funding disruptions have evolved. Here's what the numbers show

Read the original at NPR ↗
Cite

Kim, J. (2026, September 24). Under Trump, NIH funding disruptions have evolved. Here's what the numbers show. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2026/09/24/nx-s1-5931971/trump-nih-science-funding-disruptions-charts

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

NPR · collected 2026-09-24 · by Joseph Kim

Quick Summary

The article reports that under President Trump, disruptions have occurred in how the National Institutes of Health (NIH) allocates its $47.5 billion budget. Despite Congress maintaining funding levels and rejecting proposed cuts of about $19.6 billion for 2026, delays in grant disbursements have affected researchers and patients. The NIH has been slower to obligate funds since Trump's inauguration, running behind by 44 days in fiscal year 2025 and 42 days through early July 2026. Heather Pierce of the Association of American Medical Colleges notes that as of July 2026, only half of NIH’s budget had been obligated, leaving billions unallocated despite no overall reduction in funding amounts.
Written by AI on 2026-09-24, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Under President Trump's administration, there have been disruptions in NIH funding, with the agency managing a budget of $47.5 billion, where more than 80% is distributed as grants for biomedical research. Critics argue that delays and redirections by political appointees have caused chaos within scientific communities and affected patient care. However, officials from the Department of Health and Human Services maintain that these practices are aimed at ensuring responsible use of taxpayer money and advancing impactful science to improve health outcomes in America. Recently proposed rules could further increase political oversight over how NIH grants are allocated, potentially affecting future research funding.

Written for “US NIH Funding Changes Under Trump” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 US NIH Funding Changes Under Trump
Health · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
86
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
8%
7 of 86 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
60/100
NPR's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Health
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-24 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

NPR · 1002 article(s) · 3 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 3 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Joseph Kim
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 More political oversight may be coming to how those funds get dispersed, according to recent reports.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Congress NIH The National Institutes of Health Trump U.S.

Subjects

NIH ORG · 12× Trump PERSON · 4× Congress ORG · 3× Troyer PERSON · 2× the Department of Health and Human Services ORG · 2× American NORP · 1× Emily Hilliard PERSON · 1× Heather Pierce PERSON · 1× The National Institutes of Health ORG · 1× U.S. GPE · 1×

Narrative

It should be a real discussion between the administration, the scientists and the public." That's part of why he and other experts say they're worried about a new rule proposed by the White House's Office of Management and Budget — one that, if implemented, would give political appointees the final say on federal grantmaking.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-24
🔮 More political oversight may be coming to how those funds get dispersed, according to recent reports.

Claims (86 extracted, 7 hedged)

Under Trump, NIH funding disruptions have evolved. asserted
disruptions → evolve → Trump
Here's what the numbers show The National Institutes of Health (NIH) wields a $47.5 billion budget. asserted
Institutes → show → budget
More than 80% of its funds go out the door as grants to answer pressing biomedical questions. asserted
% → go → questions
Over the decades, those grants have helped decipher the human genome, eliminate the polio virus in the U.S. and turn AIDS from a death sentence to a survivable illness. asserted
grants → help → illness
But experts say this kind of fundamental science is coming up against an administration that has delayed funding and rerouted billions of dollars in research, resulting in chaos for researchers and patients alike. asserted
that → say → researchers
Trump officials say the administration's practices serve to further the agency's goals. asserted
practices → say → goals
"NIH is committed to responsible stewardship of taxpayer dollars and to advancing rigorous, high-impact science that improves health outcomes for the American people," Emily Hilliard, a spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees the NIH, wrote in an August email. asserted
which → commit → email
More political oversight may be coming to how those funds get dispersed, according to recent reports. uncertain
funds → come → reports
For now, court cases have restored funding, and Congress has preserved it in successive budget bills. asserted
Congress → restore → bills
But for the scientists who have had to scrap time-sensitive experiments or have seen their labs shuttered, those top-line numbers do not tell the full story. asserted
numbers → have → story
Here are six graphics that highlight some of the less visible impacts of changes in research funding at the NIH. asserted
that → highlight → NIH
Loading... The Trump administration proposed cutting the NIH budget by 41%, or by about $19.6 billion, for 2026. asserted
administration → load → 2026
It also asked to restructure 27 institutes to eight — eliminating four outright — in its request. asserted
It → ask → request
Congress did neither; in fact, it maintained both the existing institutes and a budget that was on par with previous years' appropriations. asserted
that → do → appropriations
But experts say that though the total amount of funding suggests that little has changed, it masks a deeper disruption in the way that money moves. uncertain
money → say → way
Once money is appropriated by Congress, it then has to be obligated by the NIH — committing the funds to specific projects via grants. asserted
it → appropriate → grants
Those grants are generally doled out at a fairly consistent rate throughout the year. asserted
grants → dole → year
But since President Trump's inauguration in 2025, that process has slowed to a crawl. asserted
process → slow → crawl
In fiscal year 2025, the NIH ran roughly 44 days behind the average pace of 2021 to 2024; through early July 2026, it ran 42 days behind. asserted
it → run → July
Loading... Heather Pierce tracks NIH obligations for the Association of American Medical Colleges. asserted
Pierce → load → Colleges
She pointed out that as of July — three-quarters of the way through the fiscal year — the NIH had obligated roughly half its budget, with billions of dollars still left on the table. asserted
NIH → point → table
Jennifer Troyer, a former director of extramural operations for the NIH's National Human Genome Research Institute, oversaw billions of dollars in grants awarded over her tenure until she resigned at the end of 2025. asserted
she → oversee → 2025
She ticked through some of the reasons for these delays. asserted
She → tick → delays
Grants are peer-reviewed and prepared by the NIH staff to get funded, stepping through different "statuses" in the process, says Troyer — but now, they are undergoing another level of review that she calls a "black hole." asserted
she → review → that
"There's a status called Status 19 I didn't, even as the director, I did not know existed until things started getting stuck," says Troyer, "because it was something that [grants] would blip through for, like, a few minutes." asserted
grants → be → minutes
Awards she had signed would go out and come back stopped, she says, flagged by the Department of Health and Human Services, by the Office of Management and Budget or by the White House "as not acceptable." asserted
she → sign → House
At first, she says, it was the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) doing the flagging; "and then they went away, but the other systems had been put in place to do the same function." asserted
systems → say → function
She says the staff members who used to process awards have also gone. asserted
who → say → awards
Her institute went from 11 grants-management specialists (plus two assistants) down to just three specialists. asserted
institute → go → specialists
Efforts to cut staff and freeze new hires exacerbated staff shortages and, in turn, further delayed funding. asserted
Efforts → cut → funding
"We did not have the person-time to put awards out the door," she says. asserted
she → have → door
With funding, timing is everything The delays also affected grants that had already been awarded. asserted
that → affect → grants
That's because many long-term NIH grants are often awarded for multiple years and paid out annually. asserted
grants → award → years
They not only fund lab work but also pay for employees and medical care in clinical trials. asserted
They → fund → trials
Scientists rely on that continuity to keep projects stable — which is why, prior to this administration, those renewals traditionally came in a week early, to avoid any funding gaps. asserted
renewals → rely → gaps
Loading... But in the past two years, grants have regularly been renewed 90 or more days late at a rate four to six times more often than in the previous four years (3.9% in the 2025 fiscal year and 2.7% in the 2026 fiscal year, compared with 0.7% in fiscal years 2021 through 2024). asserted
grants → renew → 2024
When his grant renewal got delayed, he says, "I was starting to plan who I would cut if I needed to." asserted
I → delay → who
Fortunately, he says, his university provided bridge funding and the grant was renewed two and a half months afterward. asserted
grant → say → funding
Not everyone experiencing these delays has been so lucky. asserted
everyone → experience → delays
Gutenkunst explained that researchers can sometimes get bridge funding from their institutions to keep research projects afloat, because those funds can be paid back when the grant finally renews. asserted
grant → explain → projects
…and 46 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support