Photo via New York Post

Greenland triumph is Trump’s ‘art of the deal’ in action — and it drives his haters crazy

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Hammer, J. (2026, September 24). Greenland triumph is Trump’s ‘art of the deal’ in action — and it drives his haters crazy. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/09/24/opinion/greenland-triumph-is-trumps-art-of-the-deal-in-action/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-09-24 · by Josh Hammer

Quick Summary

President Donald Trump has secured an agreement with Denmark and Greenland that solidifies U.S. strategic interests in the Arctic region, despite earlier dismissals of his intent to purchase Greenland outright. Critics such as Democrats Pete Aguilar and Ruben Gallego, along with foreign leaders like British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron, have derided Trump’s pursuit as absurd or unhinged. However, this new deal includes the establishment of additional U.S. military bases on Greenland and strengthens America's missile defense system in the area while preventing non-NATO nations from establishing a military presence there.
Written by AI on 2026-09-25, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

U.S. President Donald Trump claimed on Friday that Washington has reached an agreement with Denmark and Greenland, giving the U.S. permanent control over security and other needs in Greenland, starting a series of negotiations back in February. The deal reportedly bans China, Russia, and other non-NATO countries from establishing military bases or maintaining troops in Greenland, and restricts them from making sensitive investments there without express written approval from the U.S. Trump emphasized that the agreement comes at no cost to American taxpayers and will ensure complete control over Greenland’s security indefinitely. While details remain unclear, Trump sees this as a strategic move addressing national security concerns for the United States in the Arctic region. Denmark's reaction has been cautious; Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen confirmed the deal would be signed at the United Nations General Assembly next week but did not specify further terms.

Written for “US Greenland Security Deal” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 97 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 US Greenland Security Deal
Politics · 98 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 3% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
National Post
Hedges 2 of 33 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Article A discusses a deal between the U.S. and Greenland regarding security, while Article B draws an analogy to the Alaska purchase but does not describe the same specific incident.”
ABC News (US)
Hedges 1 of 43 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles describe different historical contexts and timelines regarding U.S. territorial acquisitions, rather than a single specific current event.”
TIME
⚖️ Leans right further left than this Hedges 6 of 56 claims Outlet record 59/100
“Article A describes a specific signing ceremony involving Trump, Denmark's PM, and Greenland’s PM regarding security on Greenland. Article B uses the Alaska purchase analogy to discuss broader strategic interests but does not describe the same specific incident.”
Washington Examiner
Hedges 0 of 49 claims Outlet record 70/100
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans right further left than this Hedges 7 of 29 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different time periods and contexts related to U.S. territorial expansion and diplomatic relations, rather than a single specific recent event.”
Evening Standard
Hedges 2 of 27 claims Outlet record 65/100
“Article A discusses Andy Burnham congratulating Trump and Denmark on a Greenland deal, while Article B references historical context about Alaska purchase and does not describe the same specific incident.”
Fox News
⚖️ Leans right further left than this Hedges 3 of 24 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Trump's interest and actions regarding Greenland, but do not describe the exact same specific incident or agreement.”
Fox News
⚖️ Leans right further left than this Hedges 4 of 34 claims Outlet record 69/100
“Article A describes the signing of a Greenland security agreement on September 22, while Article B uses this event as an analogy to historical territorial expansions like Alaska and does not describe the same specific incident.”
South China Morning Post
Hedges 2 of 6 claims Outlet record 63/100
“Article A uses Alaska's purchase as an analogy for Trump's Greenland negotiations, while Article B discusses a new security agreement involving Greenland signed on Tuesday.”
The Dispatch
⚖️ Leans right further left than this Hedges 0 of 4 claims Outlet record 61/100
“Article A references Alaska's purchase from Russia, while Article B discusses a Greenland deal signed at the U.N. General Assembly.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
36
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
3%
1 of 36 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
98
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-25 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 15868 article(s) · 35 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 35 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Josh Hammer
6 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Given the stark dichotomy of the moment, let’s fervently hope that will be more than enough to prevail in the elections this Tuesday.
🔮 On Sunday’s edition of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” host Kristen Welker asked Democratic Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed if he would “set the record straight” on his alleged ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.
🔮 The anti-Israel press may have downplayed the harrowing affair as a “pilot altercation,” but the fact is a Muslim pilot tried to crash a plane full of Jews.
🔮 The deal was widely ridiculed: Critics called it “Seward’s Folly,” after secretary of state and lead negotiator William Seward.
🔮 A new poll from Politico has the grisly details: 63% of Americans think AI has the potential to “destroy humanity.” A majority of both Democrats and Republicans now think AI could herald the apocalypse. That’s quite a sea change in less than a year: In December 2025, a poll from Navigator Research found Americans split roughly equally among those favoring data centers, opposing data centers or ambivalent.
Also by Josh Hammer
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 6 articles by Josh Hammer →

Topics

Alaska America American Danish the United States

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 15× the United States GPE · 7× America GPE · 5× Greenland GPE · 4× Danish NORP · 3× Alaska GPE · 2× American NORP · 2× Denmark GPE · 2× NATO ORG · 2× the Russian Empire GPE · 1×

Narrative

Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) took a break from conveniently ignoring his disgraced friend Eric Swalwell to rebuke Trump as “an idiot.” Former British Prime Minister Keir Starmer blasted Trump’s threat of tariffs on nations opposed to an American acquisition as “completely wrong.”
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-25
🔮 The deal was widely ridiculed: Critics called it “Seward’s Folly,” after secretary of state and lead negotiator William Seward.

Claims (36 extracted, 1 hedged)

In 1867, the United States purchased Alaska from the Russian Empire for $7.2 million. asserted
States → purchase → million
The deal was widely ridiculed: Critics called it “Seward’s Folly,” after secretary of state and lead negotiator William Seward. asserted
Critics → ridicule → Seward
In hindsight, given the state’s immense natural resources and strategic location, it’s tough to think of Alaska as anything other than one of America’s most important territorial expansion since Thomas Jefferson’s Louisiana Purchase. asserted
it → give → Purchase
Yet many have still not learned their lesson about the Monroe Doctrine, which warned foreign powers not to meddle with the United States in our hemisphere. asserted
which → learn → hemisphere
Even fewer have learned their lesson about America’s national interest in the Arctic region. asserted
fewer → learn → region
President Donald Trump’s new Greenland deal proves it. asserted
deal → prove → it
Trump has long sought the frigid, sparsely populated Danish territory. asserted
Trump → seek → territory
In August 2019, Trump confirmed he was eyeing Greenland, referring to the massive island as “strategically nice” for the US. asserted
he → confirm → US
The Danish prime minister dismissed any American acquisition as “absurd,” but the idea never died. asserted
idea → dismiss → acquisition
Just before his second term, Trump again declared US ownership of Greenland an “absolute necessity,” and Donald Trump Jr. and the late Charlie Kirk toured the island. asserted
Jr. → declare → island
Ever since, Trump the elder has repeatedly argued that the United States must acquire Greenland, citing its prized location and its coveted rare earth minerals. asserted
States → argue → location
Democrats and transatlantic elites scoffed in unison. asserted
Democrats → scoff → unison
Rep. Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.), the House Democratic Caucus chairman, called Trump’s rhetoric “completely unhinged.” asserted
Aguilar → call → rhetoric
Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) took a break from conveniently ignoring his disgraced friend Eric Swalwell to rebuke Trump as “an idiot.” Former British Prime Minister Keir Starmer blasted Trump’s threat of tariffs on nations opposed to an American acquisition as “completely wrong.” asserted
Starmer → take → acquisition
French President Emmanuel Macron attacked the possible duties as “unacceptable.” asserted
Macron → attack → duties
In reality, Trump was just doing what he does best on the world stage: Pursuing “the art of the deal” by aiming very high, applying massive leverage, and then landing on an outcome that isn’t exactly what he was targeting but still redounds solidly to America’s national interest. asserted
he → do → interest
True, the new deal Trump just signed with the Danish and Greenlandic prime ministers on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly doesn’t acquire Greenland for the US outright. asserted
Trump → sign → US
The deal affirms two new sites where the United States will station troops and build bases. asserted
States → affirm → bases
That’s in addition to America’s lonely current outpost, the remote Pituffik Space Base, home to about 150 troops — which will now be “modernized and expanded.” asserted
which → ’ → troops
The deal explicitly includes Greenland in Trump’s sprawling “Golden Dome” missile defense system. asserted
deal → include → system
It clarifies that no non-NATO nation can ever establish a military presence in its tundra. asserted
nation → clarify → tundra
And it binds Denmark to working closely with the United States to counter Russian and Chinese espionage on the world’s largest island. asserted
it → bind → island
Finally, the kicker: The deal gives the United States “permanent control over security and all other needs” in Greenland, regardless of whether Greenland ultimately wins independence from Denmark. asserted
Greenland → give → Denmark
That’s a win for the Monroe Doctrine, and a win for the United States. asserted
That → ’ → States
It’s a win for Trump. asserted
It → ’ → Trump
And it’s another win for Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who ironed out the final terms in his typically smooth fashion. asserted
who → ’ → fashion
Trump and Rubio sealed the deal by ceding on sovereignty while pressing on America’s bona fide, tangible security concerns. asserted
Trump → seal → concerns
The only surprise here is that people like Gallego and Macron are still allowing themselves to be repeatedly triggered by Trump’s over-the-top opening gambits. asserted
themselves → allow → gambits
Fact is, Trump’s “art of the deal” on the world stage follows a well-established pattern — and has a corresponding record of results. asserted
art → follow → results
On NATO, Trump secured a massive win after spouting lots of blustery rhetoric, getting NATO leaders last summer to commit to spend at least 5% of their national GDPs on defense by 2035. asserted
Trump → secure → 2035
On Iran, Trump may not (yet) have instigated the toppling of the radical Islamist theocracy, but he has crippled the mullahs’ nuclear ambitions, missile stockpile and petroleum-based economy. uncertain
he → instigate → ambitions
He’s used trade incentives and economic leverage to secure pro-America peace deals in decades-long conflicts as far-flung as those between India and Pakistan, and Armenia and Azerbaijan. asserted
He → use → India
Again and again, Trump’s critics freak out over his rhetoric, lambaste him as a lunatic or a tyrant (or both), and then watch as he negotiates a deal that gets him basically what he wanted in the first place. And most important: The United States wins big-time. asserted
States → freak → place
Trump’s haters won’t see it that way, but Trump doesn’t care. asserted
Trump → see → ?
He’ll stay focused on the bigger picture. asserted
He → stay → picture
It’s what the great men of history do. asserted
men → ’ → history
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support