Photo via Evening Standard

Booking.com under fire after tourists sent to Wetherspoons pub instead of ‘luxury apartments’

Read the original at Evening Standard ↗
Cite

Howe, M. (2026, September 24). Booking.com under fire after tourists sent to Wetherspoons pub instead of ‘luxury apartments’. Evening Standard. https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/booking-com-fake-listing-wetherspoons-pub-tower-bridge-which-b1298303.html

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Evening Standard · collected 2026-09-24 · by Megan Howe

Quick Summary

Which? reported that Booking.com had failed to remove fraudulent listings for non-existent "luxury apartments" in London, leading tourists to be directed to a Wetherspoons pub instead. The scam involved customers being asked to visit fake addresses and provide bank details, with one victim, Paul Dawson, having his booking redirected to an address that turned out to be the pub despite alerting Booking.com about the issue. Additionally, Which? set up its own fake listing for 10 Downing Street on Booking.com to highlight security flaws, noting that over 250 negative reviews had been posted against the fraudulent London Crown apartments listing before it was removed.
Written by AI on 2026-09-25, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Paul Dawson, from Loughborough, booked a one-night stay at The London Crown apartments on Booking.com for £73 to watch the musical Hamilton in London. Two days later, he discovered the address was actually The Liberty Bounds pub near Tower Bridge. When he contacted Booking.com about his concerns, they told him he needed to visit the fake apartment and wait until after 7pm before relocation. Meanwhile, staff at The Liberty Bounds had been turning away up to 20 tourists daily due to similar fraudulent listings using their address for luxury apartments. Which?, a consumer watchdog, was also able to create a fake listing on Booking.com for 10 Downing Street and reported several instances of such scams. Booking.com acknowledged these were the result of "sophisticated phishing attacks" targeting legitimate properties.

Written for “Booking Com Scam Controversy” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 1 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Booking Com Scam Controversy
Technology · 2 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 3% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
BBC News
Hedges 1 of 36 claims Outlet record 68/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
31
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
3%
1 of 31 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
64/100
Evening Standard's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
2
Technology
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-25 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Evening Standard · 8359 article(s) · 73 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 73 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Megan Howe
117 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 He added: “It would have been easy to create a bike lane on this part of the street, with metal fences and calming measures to ensure that pedestrians and cyclists were properly demarcated for safety.
🔮 Trains may be cancelled, delayed by up to 40 minutes or revised.
🔮 Footage captured by the Standard this week shows cyclists continuing to pedal along the busy 1km stretch, despite the ban and assurances from e-bike operators that geofencing would cut motor assistance to bikes entering the area, bringing them to a gradual stop.
🔮 The investigation is at a “very early stage”, with the force stressing that its enquiries will be evidence-led and focused on the needs of survivors.
🔮 Londoners could face freezing temperatures far sooner than expected, as El Niño continues to strengthen across the Pacific to what some scientists are calling “unprecedented levels”.
🔮 Chancellor John Healey will announce the Government’s tax and spending plans in his first Budget speech this afternoon.
🔮 All lines between these stations have been closed so they can carry out their work. Trains may be cancelled, delayed or revised. Major disruption is expected until midday.
🔮 Although, the early scenes suggest it could take some time for people to adjust to the new arrangements.
🔮 Other services are shortened, meaning some passengers will need to change buses to complete their journeys.
🔮 Emergency services will have access to the street at all times.
Also by Megan Howe
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 117 articles by Megan Howe →

Topics

Booking.com Dot London The London Crown Which

Subjects

Booking.com ORG · 10× London GPE · 4× The London Crown ORG · 3× Which ORG · 3× 10 Downing Street ORG · 1× Dawson PERSON · 1× Loughborough GPE · 1× Paul Dawson PERSON · 1× Spain GPE · 1× Which? ORG · 1×

Narrative

But two days after making the booking, he received an email from The London Crown containing a link to a fake Booking.com page, which asked him to provide his bank details. However, he said the platform told him he would need to visit the fake apartment and wait until after 7pm before it would relocate him.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-25
🔮 But two days after making the booking, he received an email from The London Crown containing a link to a fake Booking.com page, which asked him to provide his bank details. However, he said the platform told him he would need to visit the fake apartment and wait until after 7pm before it would relocate him.

Claims (31 extracted, 1 hedged)

Which? said staff at the pub had been turning away up to 20 tourists a day after scammers used the address of The Liberty Bounds, near Tower Bridge, for a listing advertising a “block of luxury apartments”. asserted
scammers → say → apartments
The consumer watchdog said it was also able to set up a fake listing for 10 Downing Street on Booking.com earlier this month, after being alerted to several reports from consumers about similar fraudulent listings created by real scammers. asserted
it → say → scammers
In August, Paul Dawson, 55, from Loughborough, booked a one-night stay for himself, his wife and daughter through Booking.com at The London Crown apartments while visiting London to watch a musical in the West End. asserted
Dawson → book → End
He paid £73. asserted
He → pay → 73
But two days after making the booking, he received an email from The London Crown containing a link to a fake Booking.com page, which asked him to provide his bank details. However, he said the platform told him he would need to visit the fake apartment and wait until after 7pm before it would relocate him. asserted
it → make → him
This was despite Mr Dawson explaining to them that he had since discovered the address shown in the listing was actually The Liberty Bounds pub. asserted
address → explain → listing
He told Which?: “I explained to the support staff that I had autistic children and the idea of turning up at a clearly non-existent property at 10.30pm would have been catastrophic. asserted
idea → tell → 10.30pm
“This did not change their response that I needed to go to the property. asserted
I → change → property
They said that if it was not possible to check in then I could contact them again and they would find an alternative.” uncertain
they → say → alternative
The listing for the London Crown apartments was still visible on Booking.com on September 23, with over 250 negative reviews from August and September along with a handful of – likely fake – positive reviews, Which? said. asserted
? → say → reviews
Many of the reviews from customers said they told Booking.com that it was a scam but had been ignored. asserted
it → say → Booking.com
One customer said: “I reported it to Booking.com three days before check-in but they refused to do anything.” asserted
they → say → anything
Another customer, from Spain, complained that she and her friend had been left stranded, writing: “Two girls alone in London at two o’clock in the morning with no accommodation.” asserted
she → complain → accommodation
Booking.com also has an AI trip planner called Dot, which allows users to ask questions. asserted
users → have → questions
On The London Crown listing page a Which? researcher asked: “Is this a real property, or is it a scam?”. asserted
it → ask → page
It replied: “The London Crown is a legitimate property located in the centre of London. asserted
Crown → reply → London
It offers various amenities such as free WiFi, free bikes, and free private parking. asserted
It → offer → WiFi
It is conveniently located near Longleat Safari Park and Longleat House, with London City Airport just 10 km away. asserted
It → locate → Airport
Based on the detailed description and amenities listed, the London Crown appears to be a real and well-equipped property.” asserted
Crown → base → description
Dot failed to recognise that Longleat Safari Park was more than hundred miles from London. asserted
Park → fail → London
Which? said it was also made aware of a property listed as “Apartments near Big Ben”, with the address given as Portcullis House, which is part of the House of Commons estate, where hundreds of MPs work. asserted
hundreds → say → MPs
Booking.com told Which? that in both cases, listings for legitimate properties had been targeted by a sophisticated phishing attack, allowing criminals to hijack the listings. asserted
criminals → tell → listings
Travel editor Rory Boland said: “Not only does Booking.com refuse to take scams seriously, but its requirement that guests turn up to properties, even when it has been advised the property doesn’t exist, is utterly reckless. asserted
property → say → properties
It’s frightening, humiliating and risks people’s safety. asserted
It → ’ → safety
“Instead of taking action when fraudulent listings are reported, Booking.com prefers to let its customers bear the financial and safety risks. asserted
customers → take → risks
“Ofcom must show it will use its powers to get tough with irresponsible online platforms that leave consumers wide open to fraud.” asserted
that → show → fraud
Booking.com said: “Our investigation indicates that both properties – which are legitimate and have hosted guests – were targeted by a sophisticated phishing attack. asserted
which → say → attack
The attack affected the properties’ own computer systems and gave cybercriminals temporary, unauthorised access to the accommodation’s Booking.com account. asserted
attack → affect → account
“We take incidents like this extremely seriously, and suspended bookings at both properties, as well as supporting affected customers.” asserted
We → take → customers
An Ofcom spokesman said: “Fraud online can have serious consequences for victims and platforms have clear legal duties to take down illegal content generated by users once they become aware of it. asserted
they → say → it
“More broadly, we’ve shown that we’ll use our enforcement powers against platforms that fail to comply with the Online Safety Act, and have already launched investigations into over 100 sites.” asserted
that → show → sites
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support