Photo via New York Post

Axing gifted education hurts our kids, our classrooms — and us all

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Stossel, J. (2026, September 25). Axing gifted education hurts our kids, our classrooms — and us all. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/09/24/opinion/axing-gifted-education-hurts-our-kids-our-classrooms-and-us-all/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-09-25 · by John Stossel

Quick Summary

Education researcher Michael Petrilli argues against the elimination of gifted and talented programs in schools, which is happening in many places to address perceived inequities. He claims this move is counterproductive because it prevents underprivileged students from accessing advanced learning opportunities that could better prepare them for higher education. Petrilli notes that while differentiated instruction aims to accommodate diverse student abilities within a single classroom, it often fails in practice, particularly in economically disadvantaged areas where gifted but poor students are most affected by the removal of ability-based tracking programs.
Written by AI on 2026-09-25, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

John Stossel in the New York Post argues against the elimination of gifted education programs in New York City, which aim to separate students by ability. The move is driven by efforts to address educational equity, but opponents like Michael Petrilli, an education researcher, claim this approach actually hinders disadvantaged and minority students from receiving necessary advanced instruction. A study by the National Bureau of Economic Research shows that universal testing for giftedness can increase representation among economically disadvantaged and minority groups in such programs. Stossel cites Jeannie Oakes' 1985 book "Keeping Track", which criticized tracking systems for creating segregated classrooms, as a starting point for the shift towards more inclusive teaching methods. However, critics argue that this move away from traditional tracking hampers effective instruction for students with varying abilities.

Written for “Gifted Education Cuts Controversy” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Gifted Education Cuts Controversy
Education · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
31
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
3%
1 of 31 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Education
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-25 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 16360 article(s) · 35 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 35 correction(s)

Who wrote this

John Stossel
4 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 A jury may protect the innocent from government abuse: Ordinary citizens, not officials, decide if you are guilty.
🔮 "He will own everything!" claims a popular YouTuber.
2026-10-07 · assertive framing · Why Trillionaires Will Be Good for America
🔮 Schools are ending gifted and talented programs: They will no longer separate kids by ability.
🔮 Artificial intelligence may enrich it even more.
Also by John Stossel
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Asian New York City the National Bureau of Economic Research

Subjects

Petrilli PERSON · 6× Asian NORP · 2× Bill de Blasio PERSON · 1× Jeannie Oakes PERSON · 1× John Stossel PERSON · 1× Michael Petrilli PERSON · 1× New York City GPE · 1× Zohran Mamdani PERSON · 1× the National Bureau of Economic Research ORG · 1×

Narrative

That’s true: A study by the National Bureau of Economic Research shows universal test-based screening for giftedness leads to “large increases in . . . economically disadvantaged students and minorities placed in gifted programs.”
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-25
🔮 Schools are ending gifted and talented programs: They will no longer separate kids by ability.
2026-09-25 · New York Post
Axing gifted education hurts our kids, our classrooms — and us all · assertive framing

Claims (31 extracted, 1 hedged)

Schools are ending gifted and talented programs: They will no longer separate kids by ability. asserted
They → end → ability
“This is so misguided,” education researcher Michael Petrilli told me. asserted
Petrilli → tell → me
“These equity people say, ‘Oh, we’re against gifted education.’ asserted
we → say → education
At the same time, they’re upset that universities aren’t very diverse. asserted
universities → ’re → time
But those same equity advocates “are a big part of the problem,” he said. asserted
he → say → problem
“They stand in the way of kids of color and low-income kids getting what they need in elementary and middle and high school so they could compete.” uncertain
they → stand → school
Different level classes haven’t always been controversial. Testing, then putting kids on different tracks was standard when I was in school. asserted
I → test → school
“It’s super hard to teach reading to everybody if some don’t know their letters and others are reading ‘Harry Potter,’” Petrilli explained. asserted
Petrilli → ’ → Potter
The change began in 1985, when education theorist Jeannie Oakes wrote “Keeping Track,” a book that complained that tracking students created racially segregated classrooms. asserted
students → begin → classrooms
Instead of tracking, teachers are supposed to use something called “differentiated instruction” to address different skill levels — adapting methods and expectations to match each student’s learning ability. asserted
teachers → suppose → ability
“Differentiating instruction!” laughed Petrilli. asserted
Petrilli → differentiate → ?
“Magically, you look out at 30 kids and figure out how to teach them all at the same time . . . asserted
you → look → time
This led to a big anti-tracking movement, a big effort to get rid of ability grouping, to just say kids should be mixed together, all the time.” asserted
kids → lead → grouping
I pointed out that richer parents sometimes hire tutors, and as result, disproportionate numbers of white and Asian kids get that fast-track education. “ asserted
numbers → point → education
But it is not mostly about race,” replied Petrilli. asserted
Petrilli → reply → race
“Many Asian kids came from severe poverty, and do well,” I noted. asserted
I → come → poverty
“Regardless of how poor they tend to be,” Petrilli agreed. asserted
Petrilli → tend → ?
“Culture matters, family matters — a lot.” asserted
family → matter → ?
But “where this has been shut down is mostly in our poorest neighborhoods. asserted
shut → shut → neighborhoods
There, you’ve got kids who are poor but academically gifted, and they suffer the worst of both worlds.” asserted
they → get → worlds
In New York City, former Mayor Bill de Blasio removed the gifted test, saying teachers and administrators should recommend which kids are fast-tracked. asserted
kids → remove → test
Activists said the tests “exclude kids because they’re poor.” asserted
they → say → kids
But Petrilli says, “There’s a lot of evidence that recommendations are biased, while tests are much less biased.” asserted
tests → say → evidence
That’s true: A study by the National Bureau of Economic Research shows universal test-based screening for giftedness leads to “large increases in . . . economically disadvantaged students and minorities placed in gifted programs.” asserted
screening → ’ → programs
At what age should tracking start? asserted
tracking → start → ?
My current mayor, Zohran Mamdani, wants to get rid of gifted classes until third grade. asserted
mayor → want → grade
“It actually is reasonable,” says Petrilli, “but you need to make sure that you have something for kids, including kindergartners, who show up highly advanced.” asserted
who → say → kindergartners
“It doesn’t help any of us if kids are coming to school and sitting bored in class because we’re not teaching them anything new.” asserted
we → help → anything
I tried to interview anti-tracking activists to ask why they think racial equity is so much more important than letting smart kids excel. asserted
kids → try → activists
Not one we contacted would agree to an interview. Today’s ideologues rarely want to debate the other side. asserted
ideologues → contact → side
John Stossel is the author of “Government Gone Wild: Exposing the Truth Behind the Headlines.” asserted
Stossel → go → Headlines
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support