Photo via ABC News (AU)

Two Canberra lawyers tried to deter former partner from owed $500k

Read the original at ABC News (AU) ↗
Cite

Bovill, M. (2026, September 25). Two Canberra lawyers tried to deter former partner from owed $500k. ABC News (AU). https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-09-25/court-finds-against-canberra-lawyers-over-ex-partner-500k/107196356

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

ABC News (AU) · collected 2026-09-25 · by Monte Bovill

Quick Summary

A Canberra law firm's partners, Benjamin Aulich and Peter Woodhouse, were found by the ACT Supreme Court to have taken steps to deter a former partner, Erin Taylor, from claiming $500,000 she was owed following her departure. The court ruled that the two lawyers delayed payments and blocked communications with Ms. Taylor as part of their strategy to prevent her from pursuing the claim for share buyback or refund.
Written by AI on 2026-09-25, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In Canberra, Acting Justice Audrey Balla ruled that lawyers Benjamin Aulich and Peter Woodhouse of the law firm Aulich Civil Law breached an agreement by not purchasing $500,000 worth of shares owed to their former partner Erin Taylor. The court found that Ms Taylor was contractually entitled to a refund or buyback of her investment due to leaving the firm within five years. The decision stated that Woodhouse and Aulich deliberately ignored her queries about payment for the shares, which should have been paid by one month after her final day at the firm in 2019. The court is scheduled to determine costs and issue further orders later.

Written for “Legal Dispute Over Debt” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Legal Dispute Over Debt
Crime & Law · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
20
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
10%
2 of 20 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
68/100
ABC News (AU)'s corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Crime & Law
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-25 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

ABC News (AU) · 4717 article(s) · 10 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 10 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Monte Bovill
8 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The government says the light rail is "on track" to be completed in the first half of 2027, with passengers expected to be welcomed aboard in 2028.
🔮 "There have been times when voters were genuinely willing, anxious to change the government but didn't feel they could trust the Liberal Party with that responsibility." Is it good for democracy?
🔮 The government is expected to table the costings of free ambulances in February.
2026-10-02 · assertive framing · ACT government examining making ambulances free
🔮 The matter will return to court in October.
🔮 Erin Taylor successfully argued she was owed a refund or buyback of shares she had bought in the law firm. What's next? The court is set to issue orders and determine costs at a later date.
🔮 "People would rightly be angry, and they should be angry firstly with Donald Trump and what appears to be a pointless and unwinnable war that he has started,"he said.
🔮 Elderly man murdered 78-year-old wife in their Canberra home, judge finds In short: A judge has found Manfred Uhle, now 88, murdered his wife, Wanda, in their home in Canberra's south last year. He was charged with murder, but was later found unfit to plead to the charge. What's next? Uhle remains in custody and the matter will return to court in October.
Also by Monte Bovill
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 8 articles by Monte Bovill →

Topics

Aulich Civil Law Canberra The Supreme Court the ACT Supreme Court

Subjects

Taylor PERSON · 11× Aulich PERSON · 9× Woodhouse PERSON · 7× Balla PERSON · 5× Canberra GPE · 2× Erin Taylor PERSON · 2× Aulich Civil Law ORG · 1× Benjamin Aulich PERSON · 1× Peter Woodhouse PERSON · 1× The Supreme Court ORG · 1×

Narrative

Mr Aulich agreed in cross-examination that he had publicly humiliated Ms Taylor." Acting Justice Balla found Mr Woodhouse and Mr Aulich breached an agreement by failing to purchase the $500,000 shares. "It should have been paid by one month after Ms Taylor's final day," the decision said.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-25
🔮 Erin Taylor successfully argued she was owed a refund or buyback of shares she had bought in the law firm. What's next? The court is set to issue orders and determine costs at a later date.
2026-09-25 · ABC News (AU)
Two Canberra lawyers tried to deter former partner from owed $500k · assertive framing

Claims (20 extracted, 2 hedged)

In short: The Supreme Court has found two Canberra lawyers tried to deter a former partner from pursuing contractual entitlements. asserted
lawyers → find → entitlements
Erin Taylor successfully argued she was owed a refund or buyback of shares she had bought in the law firm. What's next? The court is set to issue orders and determine costs at a later date. asserted
court → argue → date
Two Canberra lawyers took active steps to deter a former partner from pursuing $500,000 owed to her following both a bitter personal and professional relationship breakdown, a court has found. asserted
court → take → breakdown
Erin Taylor took Aulich Civil Law partners Benjamin Aulich and Peter Woodhouse to the ACT Supreme Court, seeking $500,000 she paid to buy 25 per cent of the civil law firm's shares in 2019. asserted
she → take → 2019
She claimed she was contractually owed a refund or buyback of the shares because she left the firm within five years. asserted
she → claim → years
In a decision published this month, Acting Justice Audrey Balla found Mr Woodhouse and Mr Aulich "embarked on a campaign" to deter Ms Taylor from pursuing her contractual entitlements. asserted
Woodhouse → publish → entitlements
Acting Justice Balla found the pair "declined to engage with Ms Taylor's repeated direct queries about how and when the money would be paid". asserted
money → act → queries
That included Mr Woodhouse blocking Ms Taylor from contacting him on his mobile phone and later deciding to block Ms Taylor from sending any more emails to the firm. asserted
Woodhouse → include → firm
Mr Woodhouse sent an internal message saying Ms Taylor was "not sending anything productive. asserted
Taylor → send → anything
The message went on to say: "I think we'd all be better off if she just f***s off and leaves us alone". asserted
she → go → us
Acting Justice Balla also found Mr Woodhouse and Mr Aulich "deliberately delayed paying Ms Taylor her leave entitlements as part of their strategy to ignore her claims and deter her from pursuing the claim for the share buyback". uncertain
Woodhouse → act → buyback
Breakdown of personal relationship Mr Woodhouse placed the firm into voluntary administration in September 2024, in what acting Justice Balla found was a decision made for himself and Mr Aulich to "obtain an advantage in this litigation". asserted
himself → place → litigation
"Their decisions were motivated to achieve unfairness,"Justice Balla said. asserted
Balla → motivate → unfairness,"Justice
That conduct followed a breakdown in a more than five-year personal relationship between Ms Taylor and Mr Aulich, which was followed by the professional relationship between the three partners becoming "strained". asserted
relationship → follow → partners
According to the decision, a meeting in a cafe about workloads between Ms Taylor and Mr Aulich in February 2024 ended abruptly, with Mr Aulich telling Ms Taylor to "get f***ed and f*** off" while he raised his middle finger at her. uncertain
he → accord → her
"He walked off with his middle finger raised over his shoulder,"the decision said. asserted
decision → walk → shoulder,"the
"This occurred in front of a colleague and a client. asserted
This → occur → colleague
Mr Aulich agreed in cross-examination that he had publicly humiliated Ms Taylor." Acting Justice Balla found Mr Woodhouse and Mr Aulich breached an agreement by failing to purchase the $500,000 shares. "It should have been paid by one month after Ms Taylor's final day," the decision said. asserted
decision → agree → day
She also found Mr Aulich and Mr Woodhouse engaged in oppressive conduct and breached statutory and fiduciary obligations. asserted
Aulich → find → obligations
The court is set to issue orders and determine costs at a later date. asserted
court → set → date
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support