Whether to support data center development is a defining issue in this campaign season, and it is a debate that has taken over many Native American tribes.
asserted
that → support → tribes
And on this issue, many Native leaders on the ballot—including Deb Haaland running for governor of New Mexico, Sharice Davids running for the House of Representatives from Kansas, Mary Peltola running for the U.S. Senate from Alaska, and Peggy Flanagan in a race for U.S. Senate in Minnesota—are being forced to address the issue head-on.
asserted
leaders → include → issue
Flanagan won the Democratic-Farmer-Labor primary for the U.S. Senate last month.
asserted
Flanagan → win → Senate
Her Ojibwe name, Gizhiiwewidamookwe, means Speaks in a Loud and Clear Voice Woman.
asserted
name → mean → Woman
She has spoken forcefully on data centers, calling AI an “existential threat to us if it gets out of control,” in a July Minnesota Public Radio News debate.
asserted
it → speak → debate
This fits a pattern.
asserted
This → fit → pattern
In her primary against Rep. Angie Craig, Flanagan ran ads attacking Craig’s ties to the crypto industry: “Angie Craig voted to let Trump make billions selling crypto coins.
asserted
Trump → run → coins
Analysts see AI and data centers as a natural extension of that same anti-corporate-money lane heading into November.
asserted
Analysts → see → November
Her “existential threat” framing is about AI broadly, tied to job loss, safety, and runaway systems.
asserted
framing → tie → loss
Davids is a former MMA fighter and lawyer by training; she knows how to throw a punch and how to build a case.
asserted
she → know → case
On data centers, she’s done neither publicly.
asserted
she → do → neither
But she took a quieter and pragmatic approach in a July KSHB voter guide, stating that “no data center should move forward if it raises electricity costs for families, wastes our limited water resources, or shifts the burden onto Kansas communities.”
asserted
it → take → communities
“Data center decisions are primarily made at the state and local level,” Davids said.
asserted
Davids → make → level
It’s also a convenient position: she sits on Transportation, Small Business, and Agriculture committees, not those that would put data centers in her lane anyway.
asserted
that → ’ → lane
In February, Davids met with the National Association of Tribal Historic Preservation Officers, which proceeded to formally vote against the Section 106 rollback in July, warning it would weaken tribal consultation and expand unilateral agency power.
asserted
it → meet → power
But showing up for a meeting doesn’t carry the same weight as making a public statement.
asserted
showing → show → statement
Haaland’s campaign has proposed sun, wind, and geothermal energy generation to offset data center energy consumption alongside requiring high-energy-demand industries to build their own energy infrastructure.
asserted
campaign → propose → infrastructure
But on the state’s biggest data center project, Project Jupiter, she’s said comparatively little.
asserted
she → say → little
Pressed by a voter in Los Lunas last week, she said: “I don’t have the power to stop Project Jupiter.”
asserted
I → press → Jupiter
Then, last week, her position seemed to have shifted.
asserted
position → seem → ?
Haaland’s campaign now says she supports a moratorium on new data center development “until we have strong, reliable guardrails.”
asserted
we → say → guardrails
This follows Searchlight New Mexico’s report of $87,200 in campaign donations from executives at Oracle and Clayco, the firm actually building Project Jupiter.
asserted
This → follow → Jupiter
Santa Fe and Socorro Counties have already passed data center moratoriums.
asserted
Counties → pass → moratoriums
Four Democratic state legislators already proposed one months ago.
asserted
legislators → propose → one
Haaland’s is a narrower, later, and far more carefully hedged version of the same idea.
asserted
Haaland → hedge → idea
But the demand for accountability didn’t end there.
asserted
demand → end → accountability
Over the weekend, a New Mexico climate justice petition started circulating, calling on Haaland to return the $87,200 and commit to no AI data centers, with no carveout for Project Jupiter.
asserted
petition → circulate → Jupiter
Haaland responded fast that she hasn’t discussed returning the money with her team, but “cannot be bowled over” by campaign donations.
asserted
she → respond → donations
Realistically, the carveout isn’t nothing: the project is 26% complete according to Oracle Cloud Infrastructure’s own vice president, up from 9% in July, despite the fact that two of its permits have been paused by the New Mexico Supreme Court.
uncertain
two → accord → Court
Peltola takes a different tack.
asserted
Peltola → take → tack
Asked about data centers at a Fairbanks Labor Day event, she said she takes her “cue from the people of that region,” deferring to local support provided it doesn’t strain the grid for existing ratepayers.
asserted
it → ask → ratepayers
It’s a notably different posture from her opponent, Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan, who has pushed to bring data centers onto Alaska’s military installations, and from a $500 million Stak Energy data center proposal already drawing scrutiny in the North Slope.
asserted
who → ’ → Slope
As I’ve reported, a lot of the state’s land—roughly 44 million acres, or 12% of all land in the state—is controlled by Alaska Native corporations, for-profit entities created by a 1971 federal law, whose boards answer to fiduciary duty, not shareholder votes.
asserted
boards → report → duty
That structure has already let corporations like the Bering Straits Native Corporation go after federal contracts, ICE included, despite loud shareholder objections boards aren’t obligated to address.
asserted
boards → let → objections
In other words, the “local support” Peltola invokes in her interview may not translate into actual votes.
uncertain
Peltola → invoke → votes
This debate also coincides with proposed changes to Section 106, a clause in the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 that requires federal agencies to assess how development affects historic sites, which are decades in the making.
asserted
which → coincide → making
If these changes are enacted, federal land, where Native Nations hold consultation rights under extant law, could theoretically become terrain AI data center developers could claim without a federal review process.
uncertain
developers → enact → process
More than 700 organizations, including Native Nations, have already signed a letter opposing this change to Section 106—but this isn’t the first time it has been targeted.
asserted
it → include → Section
Near the end of President Donald Trump’s first term, the Secretary of the Interior issued Secretarial Order 3389, exempting major energy and land-management projects from standard Section 106 review.
asserted
Secretary → issue → review
It was a move the Biden administration noticed early on and swiftly reversed.
asserted
administration → notice → ?
…and 1 more, not listed.
The Aporia
