The Aporia
Richter, E. (2026, September 25). ESPN analyst: Jalen Brunson isn’t NBA’s sixth-best player— he’s much worse. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/09/25/sports/espn-analyst-jalen-brunson-isnt-nbas-sixth-best-player-hes-much-worse/
Richter, Erich. “ESPN analyst: Jalen Brunson isn’t NBA’s sixth-best player— he’s much worse.” New York Post, 25 Sept. 2026, https://nypost.com/2026/09/25/sports/espn-analyst-jalen-brunson-isnt-nbas-sixth-best-player-hes-much-worse/.
Richter, Erich. “ESPN analyst: Jalen Brunson isn’t NBA’s sixth-best player— he’s much worse.” New York Post, September 25, 2026. https://nypost.com/2026/09/25/sports/espn-analyst-jalen-brunson-isnt-nbas-sixth-best-player-hes-much-worse/.
Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.
ESPN analyst Dean Oliver, known as a pioneer in basketball analytics, argues that Knicks player Jalen Brunson is not the NBA's sixth-best player but rather around 25th overall. This claim contrasts with ESPN’s recent top-100 rankings where seven panelists voted Brunson at No. 6. Oliver highlights potential "New York media bias" as a factor in inflating Brunson's ranking, noting that Brunson missed the final shot in Game 4 of the NBA Finals. Despite this, Brunson has averaged over 26 points per game for three consecutive seasons with shooting percentages above 46% from the field and 36% from beyond the arc. Oliver also notes that various advanced metrics and player rating systems offer a more balanced perspective on player rankings compared to human judgments alone.