The Aporia
Volokh, E. (2026, September 25). "I Will Not Stand for Being Jerked Around … by Any Lawyer Who Practices Before Me". Reason. https://reason.com/volokh/2026/09/25/i-will-not-stand-for-being-jerked-around-by-any-lawyer-who-practices-before-me/
Volokh, Eugene. “"I Will Not Stand for Being Jerked Around … by Any Lawyer Who Practices Before Me".” Reason, 25 Sept. 2026, https://reason.com/volokh/2026/09/25/i-will-not-stand-for-being-jerked-around-by-any-lawyer-who-practices-before-me/.
Volokh, Eugene. “"I Will Not Stand for Being Jerked Around … by Any Lawyer Who Practices Before Me".” Reason, September 25, 2026. https://reason.com/volokh/2026/09/25/i-will-not-stand-for-being-jerked-around-by-any-lawyer-who-practices-before-me/.
Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.
In a recent court proceeding, Judge Colleen McMahon of the Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) issued a stern warning to lawyers representing Ms. Freeman in the case *Freeman v. Deebs-Elkenaney*. The judge's order mandates that Ms. Freeman must answer every question posed during her testimony without regard for whether they have been previously asked. If counsel repeatedly asserts frivolous attorney-client privilege objections, Judge McMahon has made it clear there will be serious consequences, including sanctions and potential referral to the court’s Grievance Committee. Such actions could lead to the revocation of a lawyer's pro hac vice admission or full admission to practice before the S.D.N.Y., as well as civil contempt charges. The judge emphasized that this warning is not an idle threat, expressing frustration with counsel's perceived lack of good faith and inappropriate behavior in setting courtroom rules.