Photo via The Guardian

White House claims pro-Trump ad it paid Fox to air was ‘public service announcement’

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Cite

Mackey, R. (2026, September 25). White House claims pro-Trump ad it paid Fox to air was ‘public service announcement’. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/sep/25/white-house-pro-trump-ad-fox

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Guardian · collected 2026-09-25 · by Robert Mackey

Quick Summary

The White House has defended its decision to use taxpayer funds to purchase airtime on Fox News for a pro-Trump ad by claiming it was a public service announcement. The ad features Trump urging voters to defeat communism and includes praise from a supporter during the 2024 campaign, alongside text highlighting his perceived accomplishments like tax cuts and manufacturing growth. Democrats have criticized this as potentially illegal government propaganda aimed at influencing midterm elections.
Written by AI on 2026-09-26, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In mid-October 2018, the Trump administration began airing a series of ads on major networks like Fox News and CBS that praised President Trump's achievements. These ads were funded by taxpayer money and included phrases such as "Paid for by the U.S. Government." The first ad aired on Fox News, denouncing communism while highlighting domestic manufacturing, tax cuts, and law enforcement support.

The ad featured images of Trump at various events with patriotic music in the background and text stating, “America will never be a communist country.” It drew criticism from Democrats like Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD), who accused it of violating federal rules against using government funds for political campaigns. Raskin said such use could constitute "felony criminal theft" and violate the Hatch Act.

By October 19, AdImpact reported that spending on these ads had increased from $14,000 to $430,000 over three days, running in markets across the country. The White House defended the ad as a "public service announcement," arguing it was educational and patriotic rather than political.

Critics argue that with midterm elections approaching, these ads blur the line between government messaging and campaign propaganda, raising concerns about ethical violations and misuse of taxpayer dollars.

Written for “Taxpayer Funded Pro-Trump Ads” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 43 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Taxpayer Funded Pro-Trump Ads
Politics · 44 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 13% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 3 claims Outlet record 64/100
Mother Jones
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 2 of 15 claims Outlet record 95/100
ABC News (US)
Hedges 3 of 24 claims Outlet record 70/100
CBS News
Hedges 2 of 24 claims Outlet record 66/100
Washington Examiner
Hedges 3 of 20 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles describe different aspects of a campaign involving taxpayer-funded ads, but they are not reporting on the exact same incident or occurrence.”
Zeteo
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 12 claims
TIME
Hedges 3 of 36 claims Outlet record 59/100
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 66/100
CBS News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 66/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
30
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
13%
4 of 30 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
66/100
The Guardian's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
44
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-26 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Guardian · 1841 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Robert Mackey
16 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 “But what I will say is that for all of the discussion around 30-second ads, I would love, even for this final close, for this campaign to really be about policy,” Ramaswamy added, before criticizing his opponent for not debating him.
🔮 The allegation went viral two weeks ago, when a Republican operative posing as an ordinary voter asked El-Sayed if he would “disavow the Muslim Brotherhood”, and the candidate replied, “Sure, yeah, absolutely,” before comparing the fearmongering about his faith to fears about John F Kennedy’s Catholicism in 1960.
🔮 Matt Duss, a former foreign police adviser to senator Bernie Sanders, the most prominent Jewish American politician, responded to the ADL’s failure to mention Trump by suggesting its president would have been more direct had someone else used the slur.
🔮 “We will not forget, Norway, that you didn’t give this prize.”
🔮 After a bipartisan backlash to the use of public money to promote himself during the final month of the midterm campaign season, Trump claimed on Monday that he would direct the Maga Inc Super Pac he controls to pay for the ads instead.
🔮 “She will be an outstanding addition to President Trump’s communications team as an Assistant Press Secretary – we look forward to having her on board!”
🔮 Kennedy, a lawyer with degrees from both the University of Virginia and University of Oxford, appeared to be tacitly acknowledging the argument made by Jamie Raskin, a Democratic congressman and legal scholar, that any government employees who worked on the first pro-Trump ad – “or used government resources to make it” – may have committed a felony violation of the Hatch act, a law that bars government workers from partisan campaign activities.
🔮 “Today, yes, it happens to be CNN, but tomorrow it could be any other news outlet.”
🔮 The White House on Friday defended its decision to use taxpayer funds to buy airtime on Fox News for a White House-produced, pro-Trump ad that some Democrats said could be illegal government propaganda aimed at influencing voters in the upcoming midterm elections.
🔮 “We will immediately begin the process of developing a large Military presence in the appropriate part of Greenland,” Trump added.
Also by Robert Mackey
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 16 articles by Robert Mackey →

Topics

America Democrats Fox Fox News The White House

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 15× The White House ORG · 5× Fox News ORG · 3× America GPE · 2× American NORP · 2× Democrats NORP · 2× Fox ORG · 2× JMSN PERSON · 1× Las Vegas GPE · 1× White House ORG · 1×

Narrative

In fact, slowing down the rapid-fire montage reveals that the flash-frame imagery in the ad is exclusively of Trump commanding the stage in a bizarre mix of moments during his second term, including: overseeing the US military raid on Venezuela; hosting a state dinner for Saudi crown prince Mohammed bin Salman; accepting the Fifa peace prize; pardoning a turkey; announcing a new class of US navy ships to be named for himself; attending a Kennedy Center performance; awarding the Fifa Club World Cup trophy; showing Cristiano Ronaldo his presidential walk of fame; and addressing McDonald’s owners.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-26
🔮 The White House on Friday defended its decision to use taxpayer funds to buy airtime on Fox News for a White House-produced, pro-Trump ad that some Democrats said could be illegal government propaganda aimed at influencing voters in the upcoming midterm elections.

Claims (30 extracted, 4 hedged)

The White House on Friday defended its decision to use taxpayer funds to buy airtime on Fox News for a White House-produced, pro-Trump ad that some Democrats said could be illegal government propaganda aimed at influencing voters in the upcoming midterm elections. uncertain
Democrats → defend → elections
In a lengthy statement sent to news outlets, the White House press office insisted that versions of the ad, which feature audio of Trump urging voters to help him “defeat communism” and a whirlwind video review of his second term, were simply routine “public service announcements” like those produced by previous administrations. asserted
him → send → administrations
However, while the Trump administration ad features the president in almost every frame, and includes words of praise for him offered by a prominent supporter during the 2024 campaign, none of the advertising from three prior administrations the White House called similar featured any partisan messaging or showed images of Trump’s predecessors. asserted
House → feature → predecessors
By contrast, the 30-second version of the pro-Trump ad broadcast on Fox News this week uses audio of Trump telling supporters in Las Vegas last month: “Together we will defeat communism, socialism and Marxism in America,” and a rapid-fire montage of images of Trump beneath the onscreen text: “America will never be a communist country,” as a chorus sings the words “love me”, taken from a song of that name by JMSN. asserted
chorus → broadcast → JMSN
In the original speech, Trump explicitly identified the enemy as “Dumocrat communists in Congress”. asserted
Trump → identify → Congress
The last 10 seconds of the ad include text at the bottom the screen saying: “Paid for by the US government.” asserted
seconds → include → government
The ad aired on Fox News this week as Trump hosted the leader of the world’s largest communist nation, China, for a lavish state visit. asserted
Trump → air → visit
In its new statement, the White House insisted that versions of the ad celebrating Trump, which were also posted on official government accounts on TikTok and YouTube before airing on Fox, “are very clearly not campaign ads; President Trump is not on the ballot and there is no call to action. asserted
Trump → insist → action
Instead, the announcements are a reminder for Americans to love their country and know why it’s worth defending – at home, at the border, and abroad.” asserted
it → love → border
In fact, the version of the ad broadcast on Fox clearly includes partisan messaging that celebrates Trump’s presidency and features his rhetoric comparing Democrats to communists in the run-up to congressional elections in which he recently urged supporters to “pretend I’m on the ballot” and vote for his party. asserted
I → broadcast → party
Unlike the initial versions of the ad posted on social media, the broadcast version includes onscreen text boasting about what Trump calls his accomplishments. asserted
Trump → post → what
“Largest tax cuts in history,” one slogan reads. asserted
slogan → read → history
“Reigniting American manufacturing,” says another. asserted
another → reignite → manufacturing
“Defend law and order and police,” comes next. asserted
Defend → defend → law
The broadcast version of the ad also closes with a tribute to Trump from Dana White, the Ultimate Fighting Championship chief executive, who can be heard saying: “He is the toughest, most resilient human being I have ever met in my life.” asserted
I → close → life
White used that formulation to describe Trump multiple times during the 2024 presidential election campaign, most notably to sing Trump’s praises at the Republican national convention. asserted
White → use → convention
While the White House argues that the ad is an “unapologetically American” public service announcement “aimed at the country – not a line on the ballot”, the actual images used are not of the grandeur of the country or its people, but just its current president. asserted
images → argue → country
In fact, slowing down the rapid-fire montage reveals that the flash-frame imagery in the ad is exclusively of Trump commanding the stage in a bizarre mix of moments during his second term, including: overseeing the US military raid on Venezuela; hosting a state dinner for Saudi crown prince Mohammed bin Salman; accepting the Fifa peace prize; pardoning a turkey; announcing a new class of US navy ships to be named for himself; attending a Kennedy Center performance; awarding the Fifa Club World Cup trophy; showing Cristiano Ronaldo his presidential walk of fame; and addressing McDonald’s owners. asserted
Trump → slow → owners
The paid advertising by prior administrations which the Trump White House compared its ad to on Friday were uniformly non-partisan public information campaigns. asserted
House → pay → Friday
A 2002 Super Bowl ad from the White House office of national drug control policy, which connected drug use by young Americans to funding terrorist attacks, made no mention of political parties or then president George W Bush. asserted
which → connect → parties
A 2015 ad showing people how much money they could save by signing up for health insurance at healthcare.gov did not show or mention Barack Obama. uncertain
they → show → Obama
A 2021 ad from the department of health and human services to promote the Covid-19 vaccine similarly made no mention of the president at the time, Joe Biden. asserted
ad → promote → time
The White House defense of its ad comes after the representative Jamie Raskin, a Maryland Democrat and constitutional scholar, suggested on social media that the ad may violate federal laws including the Hatch Act. uncertain
ad → come → Act
“This may be felony criminal theft and conversion of government property for political campaign purposes,” Raskin wrote. uncertain
Raskin → write → purposes
“It is a Hatch Act violation for any government employees who worked on it or used government resources to make it. asserted
who → work → it
It is blatantly unethical under numerous federal ethics provisions proscribing the use of government resources for political campaigns.” asserted
It → proscribe → campaigns
AdImpact, a firm that tracks political ads, told the Wall Street Journal that the pro-Trump ad aired on Fox News in New York City, Los Angeles, Miami and Washington DC, as well as on Newsmax in Chicago. asserted
ad → track → Chicago
JMSN, the Detroit-born artist who wrote and performs the song Love Me, wrote on social media that it had been used “illegally”, because he was not approached by the White House for permission. asserted
he → bear → permission
“I would never authorize my music to be used for ANY political agenda or campaign,” the singer wrote. asserted
singer → authorize → agenda
“I am looking at lawyers handling this.” asserted
I → look → this
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support