May President Trump Exclude CNN from Air Force One? Very Likely Yes

Read the original at Reason ↗
Cite

Volokh, E. (2026, September 26). May President Trump Exclude CNN from Air Force One? Very Likely Yes. Reason. https://reason.com/volokh/2026/09/26/may-president-trump-exclude-cnn-from-air-force-one-very-likely-yes/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Reason · collected 2026-09-26 · by Eugene Volokh

Quick Summary

President Trump has excluded CNN from traveling on Air Force One, following his earlier unsuccessful attempt to ban them from the White House press briefing room. This move is legally permissible according to a 2025 D.C. Circuit decision in AP v. Budowich, which affirmed that restricted spaces like Air Force One are not subject to First Amendment protections against viewpoint discrimination. The decision allows the President discretion over who can access such spaces based on their viewpoint or other considerations.
Written by AI on 2026-09-26, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On September 25, 2026, the White House barred CNN from flying with President Donald Trump on Air Force One for his trip to Knoxville, Tennessee, on September 26, where he was scheduled to attend a college football game. This decision followed a previous ban by Trump against CNN and other outlets like MS NOW and Politico from covering his daily activities at the White House. Despite a judge’s order restoring access to the White House grounds for these networks, the ruling did not address Air Force One pool duties. The spot meant for CNN was instead given to Real America's Voice News, a conservative network. This move escalates an ongoing dispute over media freedoms and highlights concerns about First Amendment implications.

Written for “CNN Barred From Air Force One” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 20 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 CNN Barred From Air Force One
Politics · 21 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans right and hedges 27% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
BBC News
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 0 of 13 claims Outlet record 68/100
ABC News (AU)
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 2 of 25 claims Outlet record 68/100
NBC News
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 1 of 10 claims Outlet record 60/100
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 64/100
Mother Jones
Hedges 4 of 14 claims Outlet record 96/100
“The articles describe different incidents: one about news networks pausing coverage of presidential events due to Trump banning CNN from the White House, and another about Trump excluding CNN from Air Force One.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 2 of 17 claims Outlet record 66/100
CBC News
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 1 of 16 claims Outlet record 74/100
New York Post
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 2 of 19 claims Outlet record 66/100
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 2 of 13 claims Outlet record 70/100
South China Morning Post
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 1 of 3 claims Outlet record 64/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
44
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
27%
12 of 44 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
67/100
Reason's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
21
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-26 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Reason · 1039 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Eugene Volokh
167 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The hope would be to siphon votes away from Sullivan.
🔮 Defendants observe that Alibaba is not completely banned from appearing before the federal government—it could hire more in-house lobbyists or find a firm that is willing to forgo defense contractor clients….
🔮 Still others predicted that someone would eventually remove the context and circulate the resulting footage as though Mr. Piker had been speaking sincerely.
2026-10-27 · assertive framing · Hasan Piker Sues Scott Jennings
🔮 The Indictment alleges that Holmes posted on that account several statements against the Jewish community and Israel, including: "The jew will be destroyed and discarded," "From the river to the sea every Jew will die," "You inbred people will all die," and "Die Jew."
🔮 When reviewing whether the evidence was sufficient to support the issuance [or extension] of a 258E order, we consider [consistently with the statutory requirements] whether, "by a preponderance of the evidence, together with all permissible inferences," the judge could have found "that the defendant had committed '[three] or more acts of willful and malicious conduct aimed at a specific person committed with the intent to cause fear, intimidation, abuse or damage to property and that [did] in fact cause fear, intimidation, abuse or damage to property.'"
🔮 The Volokh Conspiracy Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent New from Reason: a look into what Javier Milei has accomplished and what it will take to make the most of Argentina’s window for real change.
2026-10-25 · assertive framing · Open Thread
🔮 The Volokh Conspiracy Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent New from Reason: a look into what Javier Milei has accomplished and what it will take to make the most of Argentina’s window for real change.
2026-10-24 · assertive framing · Open Thread
🔮 The original TRO—the one actually issued on July 20, 2025—named as plaintiffs eleven individuals and organizations who had never been party to the case; named as defendants two officials who were not actually sued; claimed, without evidence, that three post-secondary institutions had already cancelled DEI initiatives or programming because of the act; further declared, again without evidence, that staff at another school had been told not to discuss certain topics, including "historical interpretations involving systemic racism"; misquoted H.B. 1193 as applying to "race or sex stereotyping," "race or sex scapegoating," "critical race theory," and "institutional bias," despite none of these terms' appearing in the act's text; and referenced purported declarations of four individuals who do not appear in the record at all and may not even exist….
🔮 Critics fear that the Department of Justice's antitrust division will overlook mergers when it is convenient for the administration.
🔮 Body armor may be used more today than Defendants' understanding of its use in 1791.
2026-10-21 · assertive framing · Body Armor Ban Struck Down by N.Y. Federal Court
Also by Eugene Volokh
Hasan Piker Sues Scott Jennings
2026-10-27 · Reason
Open Thread
2026-10-27 · Reason
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 167 articles by Eugene Volokh →

Topics

Air Force One CNN D.C. Circuit First Amendment the White House

Subjects

the White House ORG · 7× Trump PERSON · 3× CNN ORG · 2× Knight PERSON · 2× Sherrill PERSON · 2× AP v. Budowich ORG · 1× D.C. Circuit ORG · 1× Volokh PERSON · 1× Washington GPE · 1× White House ORG · 1×

Narrative

Finally, note that, just as the precedents that limit revocation of White House press passes don't apply to exclusion from the Oval Office and Air Force One, the Thursday order's terms likewise cover only White House press passes: Defendants (except for President Trump) and their agents, representatives, and all persons or entities acting in concert with them shall immediately return, reinstate, and restore the White House "hard pass" press credentials held by employees of CNN, MS NOW, and POLITICO that were revoked on or about September 18, 2026, until further Order of the Court or the expiration of this Temporary Restraining Order. So the President's Air Force One decision doesn't violate the district court's order, as well as being consistent with D.C. Circuit precedent.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-26
🔮 The White House therefore retains discretion to determine, including on the basis of viewpoint, which journalists will be admitted.

Claims (44 extracted, 12 hedged)

After being blocked in his attempt to keep CNN out of the White House altogether (including the main press briefing room), President Trump has excluded CNN from traveling with him on Air Force One. asserted
Trump → block → Force
This, though, he is quite likely allowed to do. asserted
he → allow → This
As you likely recall, last year Trump kicked AP out of the Oval Office press pool, because the AP had refused (in my view correctly refused) to call the Gulf of Mexico "the Gulf of America." asserted
AP → recall → America
A D.C. Circuit panel majority, to oversimplify slightly, concluded that this was constitutionally permissible, both as to the Oval Office and as to Air Force One. asserted
this → oversimplify → One
The White House is likely to succeed on the merits because these restricted presidential spaces {Oval Office, … Air Force One, and … the President's home in Mar-a-Lago} are not First Amendment fora opened for private speech and discussion. asserted
spaces → succeed → speech
The White House therefore retains discretion to determine, including on the basis of viewpoint, which journalists will be admitted. asserted
journalists → retain → viewpoint
The majority concluded that those spaces differed from some more broadly open spaces in the White House: asserted
spaces → conclude → House
Reporters and photographers have long been permitted access to the White House complex to cover the President and his administration. asserted
Reporters → permit → President
The White House manages access by requiring journalists to obtain a press credential called a hard pass. asserted
House → manage → credential
More than one thousand journalists hold hard passes, through which they may access spaces such as the James S. Brady Briefing Room, where the White House Press Secretary delivers regular briefings. uncertain
Secretary → hold → briefings
Hard pass holders may also sign up via a reservation system to attend larger events hosted in the East Room, which is often used for meetings with foreign leaders, executive order signings, and press conferences. uncertain
which → sign → leaders
Because the White House has opened these press facilities "to all bona fide Washington-based journalists," hard passes may not be denied arbitrarily or based on the content of a journalist's speech. uncertain
passes → open → speech
When the White House opens its facilities to the press generally, as it does in the Brady Briefing Room, it cannot exclude journalists based on viewpoint. asserted
it → open → viewpoint
On the other hand, we have never suggested that there are any First Amendment restrictions on "the discretion of the President to grant interviews or briefings with selected journalists." uncertain
we → suggest → journalists
In deciding which journalists to speak with, the President may of course take into account their viewpoint. uncertain
President → decide → viewpoint
If President Trump sits down for an interview with Laura Ingraham, he is not required to do the same with Rachel Maddow. asserted
he → sit → Maddow
The First Amendment does not control the President's discretion in choosing with whom to speak or to whom to provide personal access. asserted
Amendment → control → access
It is a time honored and entirely mundane aspect of our competitive and free press that public officials "regularly subject all reporters to some form of differential treatment based on whether they approve of the reporters' expression." asserted
they → honor → expression
These uncontested principles provide the framework for assessing the AP's claim that the Oval Office and other restricted spaces become nonpublic fora [in which viewpoint discrimination is forbidden -EV] when the White House selects a small group of journalists (such as the press pool) to be present for observational newsgathering and reporting…. uncertain
House → provide → newsgathering
The Oval Office is the President's office, over which he has absolute control and discretion to exclude the public or members of the press. asserted
he → have → press
As the district court explained, the Oval Office "is a highly controlled location … shrouded behind a labyrinth of security protocols," which "few members of the public will ever" enter. asserted
members → explain → public
The President uses the space for myriad purposes, including speeches, signing ceremonies, and meetings with senior officials or heads of state. asserted
President → use → state
When events in the Oval Office are broadcast to the public, they feature the President's speech and expressive activity. asserted
they → broadcast → speech
It hardly needs to be said that the Oval Office, Air Force One, or even the East Room are not places "traditionally open to assembly and debate," nor are they open to the public for expressive activity…. asserted
they → need → activity
Only about one percent of hard pass holders can fit in spaces like the Oval Office. asserted
percent → fit → Office
{Both the AP and the district court at various points suggest that if the White House maintains something like the press pool, it must allow access on a viewpoint neutral basis. asserted
it → suggest → basis
For the reasons already explained, a group of journalists observing presidential events is not a forum of any sort. asserted
group → explain → sort
Accordingly, the White House should not have to choose between excluding all journalists and admitting journalists under the restrictions of a nonpublic forum. asserted
House → have → forum
By recognizing the distinctions between different fora "we encourage the government to open its property to some expressive activity in cases where, if faced with an all-or-nothing choice, it might not open the property at all."} uncertain
it → recognize → property
… The messages conveyed in the Oval Office are government speech and opportunities for the President's administration to express its message. asserted
administration → convey → message
"When government speech is involved, forum analysis does not apply and the Government may favor or espouse a particular viewpoint." uncertain
Government → involve → viewpoint
Choosing who may observe or possibly speak with the President in these spaces is not the type of action that supports a retaliation claim. uncertain
that → choose → claim
Rather, it is more akin to a decision about how the President wields the bully pulpit…. asserted
President → wield → pulpit
To be sure, CNN has also argued that the revocation of its reporters' White House press passes violated the Due Process Clause as well as the First Amendment. asserted
revocation → argue → Clause
Indeed, the judge's order Thursday morning requiring the White House to reinstate those press passes relied on the Due Process Clause, and didn't reach the First Amendment. asserted
order → require → Amendment
(The D.C. Circuit Sherrill v. Knight decision, which the judge relied on Thursday and which AP v. Budowich discussed, concluded that denial of a White House press pass based on viewpoint would violate both the First Amendment and the Due Process Clause.) asserted
denial → rely → Amendment
But the logic of the D.C. Circuit AP v. Budowich decision, it seems to me, applies equally to the Due Process Clause. asserted
it → seem → Clause
The Sherrill precedent expressly yoked the First Amendment and Due Process Clause claims together: uncertain
precedent → yoke → Amendment
In our view, the procedural requirements of notice of the factual bases for denial, an opportunity for the applicant to respond to these, and a final written statement of the reasons for denial are compelled by the foregoing determination that the interest of a bona fide Washington correspondent in obtaining a White House press pass is protected by the first amendment. asserted
interest → respond → amendment
This first amendment interest undoubtedly qualifies as liberty which may not be denied without due process of law under the fifth amendment. uncertain
which → qualify → amendment
…and 4 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support