Photo via Washington Examiner

Trump is right about left-wing bias — but he shouldn’t rewrite history

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Watts, C. (2026, September 26). Trump is right about left-wing bias — but he shouldn’t rewrite history. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/op-eds/4740318/trump-bias-rewriting-american-history/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-09-26 · by Christopher Watts

Quick Summary

In March 2025, President Donald Trump issued an executive order directing federal museums and historical sites to highlight America's positive contributions while downplaying its failures. The article argues that there is merit in expressing pride in American history but criticizes what it sees as an excessive focus on negative aspects and ideological biases in academia and media. It highlights concerns about teaching a narrative that emphasizes oppression rather than the nation’s advancements toward liberty and prosperity, suggesting that such a perspective can be detrimental to patriotism.
Written by AI on 2026-09-26, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In March 2025, President Donald Trump issued an executive order directing federal museums and historical sites to emphasize America's achievements and contributions to liberty and prosperity, arguing that many institutions had moved towards a narrative focusing solely on oppression and shortcomings. The order aimed to counter what Trump perceived as an increasingly anti-American presentation of the nation’s history in academic and media circles. Critics argue that this move could distort historical perspectives by promoting a biased view of American heritage with excessive pride, potentially undermining critical understanding of past failures.

Written for “Trump Criticizes Media Bias” on 2026-10-30, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Trump Criticizes Media Bias
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 5% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
ProPublica
Hedges 13 of 162 claims Outlet record 58/100
“Article A describes Trump's attempts to install warning signs and fire officials, while Article B discusses an executive order from March 2025 aimed at correcting left-wing bias in historical presentations. They describe related but distinct actions.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
38
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
5%
2 of 38 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
70/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-26 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 3780 article(s) · 7 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 7 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Christopher Watts
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Would conservatives be comfortable if the next progressive president, say President Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez or President Gavin Newsom, decided what the “correct interpretation” of history should be?
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

America American anti-American

Subjects

America GPE · 7× American NORP · 3× Trump PERSON · 2× Americans NORP · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× Smithsonian ORG · 1× anti-American NORP · 1×

Narrative

There is nothing wrong with wanting people to encounter their history with a degree of pride and respect, and I do believe that many institutions have moved beyond a basic criticism of some of America’s failures to a place of using these shortcomings to define America as a whole, viewing our history in an oppressor versus oppressed narrative framework, and teaching this to the younger generation as if it were absolute truth.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-26
🔮 Would conservatives be comfortable if the next progressive president, say President Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez or President Gavin Newsom, decided what the “correct interpretation” of history should be?
2026-09-26 · Washington Examiner
Trump is right about left-wing bias — but he shouldn’t rewrite history · assertive framing

Claims (38 extracted, 2 hedged)

In March 2025, President Donald Trump issued an executive order aimed at what his administration described as an increasingly anti-American presentation of the nation’s history. asserted
administration → issue → history
The order directed federal museums and historical sites to emphasize America’s extraordinary heritage, its progress toward a more perfect union, and its contributions to liberty and prosperity. asserted
order → direct → liberty
There is nothing wrong with wanting people to encounter their history with a degree of pride and respect, and I do believe that many institutions have moved beyond a basic criticism of some of America’s failures to a place of using these shortcomings to define America as a whole, viewing our history in an oppressor versus oppressed narrative framework, and teaching this to the younger generation as if it were absolute truth. asserted
it → be → generation
The idea that there is a certain self-loathing of America and American ideals prevalent in academia and media has been a longtime conservative whipping boy, although the complaint no longer seems confined to conservative intellectual circles. asserted
complaint → be → circles
Some segments of our political spectrum seem to recoil at the very thought of patriotism or pride in the nation’s heritage. asserted
segments → seem → heritage
There have even been those who have claimed our entire heritage is simply a program of white supremacy. asserted
heritage → claim → supremacy
We do have things to be proud of in American history. asserted
We → have → history
The high-minded principles in our founding documents have been used time and again to modify our society, expanding democratic processes and addressing inequalities in our civil liberties. asserted
principles → use → liberties
America has spearheaded innovation and enterprise, creating a way of life that is both imitated and coveted around the world. asserted
that → spearhead → world
America has stood up to totalitarian states and presided over the cultural and technological progress of the modern age. asserted
America → stand → age
A patriotic history, however, does not have to pretend that we have always conformed to the principles of liberty that have defined us. asserted
that → have → us
Those who write the curriculum of our schools or write the inscriptions and organize the exhibits at our national museums claim, “We’re just teaching history.” uncertain
We → write → history
Someone decides what exhibit in a museum is “Exhibit A” or “B.” asserted
exhibit → decide → museum
Someone produces and approves the content that accompanies the exhibit on the wall. asserted
that → produce → wall
The word “story” is built into the word history. asserted
story → build → history
The academic institutions are very certainly presenting the “story” of America in a specific frame, one that many on the Right see as explicitly ideologically leftist. asserted
many → present → Right
In the classroom, history is often interpreted through an ideological framework emphasizing power, oppression, identity, and group conflict. asserted
history → interpret → power
It seems ludicrous to indoctrinate the future leaders of your country with a general disdain for it. asserted
It → seem → it
Do I think that the president’s claims of ideological institutional capture are a right-wing conspiracy theory? uncertain
claims → think → capture
Taking Trump’s argument at face value, agreeing that there has been an ideological capture of American institutions, does not imply that the solution to this problem is to ideologically capture our institutions in the reverse direction. asserted
solution → take → direction
Continuing the fight against the left-wing takeover of the narrative, the president proceeded to review the Smithsonian in July of 2026. asserted
president → continue → 2026
The administration did not demand historical accuracy. asserted
administration → demand → accuracy
It demanded that federal historical sites should be “solemn and uplifting” and instructed officials to prevent presentations that “inappropriately disparage” Americans. asserted
that → demand → Americans
The truth is not always “uplifting. asserted
truth → uplift → ?
Accuracy is a standard historians can debate using evidence. asserted
historians → debate → evidence
“Uplifting” is a prescribed emotional outcome. asserted
Uplifting → prescribe → ?
The moment the government moves from requiring accuracy to requiring the proper emotional response, it has crossed from preserving history into managing it. asserted
it → move → it
Trump has no greater authority over historical truth than his political opponents do. asserted
opponents → have → truth
In a republic, the truth is a debate, not a government-issued public relations statement. asserted
truth → issue → republic
Would conservatives be comfortable if the next progressive president, say President Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez or President Gavin Newsom, decided what the “correct interpretation” of history should be? asserted
interpretation → say → history
Is a conservative capture of our institutions justified by the previous progressive ideological capture? asserted
capture → justify → capture
What stops the next president from changing the thought-policing regime to their own political preferences? asserted
What → stop → preferences
Although I can find common ground with the desire to restore respect for this Republic’s past, there are few things more contrary to American ideals than the President himself commanding how our history should be taught and interpreted. asserted
history → find → President
Given our four-to-eight-year changeover in administrations, American history runs the risk of being an official piñata that Republicans and Democrats hit back and forth at each other, more concerned with politicizing the past in the present than in a genuine understanding or debate. asserted
Republicans → give → understanding
History can be a potent propagandist’s tool, or it can be a study not only of where we came from but also of where we are capable of going. asserted
we → come → where
Trump is right, American history deserves better, but it deserves much better than government-approved history. asserted
it → deserve → history
Christopher Watts is a freelance writer covering history, politics, and international affairs. asserted
Watts → cover → history
His work has appeared on WorldAtlas. asserted
work → appear → WorldAtlas
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support