Photo via Washington Examiner

Manufacturing mental illness to block deportations: It’s time to put immigration evaluations on ice

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Brooks, L. (2026, September 26). Manufacturing mental illness to block deportations: It’s time to put immigration evaluations on ice. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/op-eds/4737644/psychologists-immigration-evaluations-deportation-fraud/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-09-26 · by Larry Brooks

Quick Summary

A neuropsychologist describes attending training sessions sponsored by the Hispanic Neuropsychological Society aimed at helping psychologists document cognitive impairments or emotional barriers for immigrants to avoid deportation. The sessions revealed that some presenters view these evaluations as a form of social justice advocacy, suggesting that comprehensive assessments are not necessary since ICE attorneys lack expertise to challenge them. The author raises concerns about potential bias in psychological evaluations affecting immigration outcomes and suggests that diagnoses might be manipulated to aid illegal immigrants unfairly. U.S. Customs and Immigration Service data indicate extreme hardship waivers had an approval rate approaching 90% in 2025, highlighting the significant impact of these evaluations on immigration decisions.
Written by AI on 2026-09-26, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Larry Brooks, writing for the Washington Examiner, discusses concerns over immigration evaluations conducted by psychologists to help undocumented immigrants avoid deportation. Recently, changes in licensing laws have allowed most psychologists to conduct telehealth evaluations nationwide without leaving their office, leading some practitioners to establish group telehealth practices that can evaluate multiple illegal immigrants daily across different states.

Brooks attended four training sessions sponsored by the Hispanic Neuropsychological Society's social justice and advocacy committee. The sessions focused on documenting immigrants’ “cognitive impairments or severe emotional barriers” that could justify exceptions to procedural requirements, essentially helping them avoid deportation. Presenters viewed these evaluations as a form of social justice, but Brooks worries this might compromise the objectivity and integrity of mental health professionals involved in immigration cases.

Written for “Immigration Evaluations Controversy” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Immigration Evaluations Controversy
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
32
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
28%
9 of 32 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
70/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-26 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 3820 article(s) · 7 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 7 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Larry Brooks
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Specifically, it promised to help me and my peers document illegal immigrants’ “cognitive impairments or severe emotional barriers that may justify exceptions to procedural requirements.”
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

America ICE Immigration and Customs Enforcement U.S. the Hispanic Neuropsychological Society

Subjects

U.S. GPE · 2× America GPE · 1× Americans NORP · 1× En Solidaridad ORG · 1× ICE ORG · 1× Immigration and Customs Enforcement ORG · 1× U.S. Customs and Immigration Service ORG · 1× Washington GPE · 1× the Hispanic Neuropsychological Society ORG · 1× the United States GPE · 1×

Narrative

Recent state changes to licensing laws mean that most psychologists can now conduct telehealth evaluations in most of the nation without leaving their desk, and entrepreneurial practitioners have built group telehealth practices capable of evaluating multiple illegal immigrants daily all over the country.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-26
🔮 Specifically, it promised to help me and my peers document illegal immigrants’ “cognitive impairments or severe emotional barriers that may justify exceptions to procedural requirements.”

Claims (32 extracted, 9 hedged)

I rarely pay attention to advertisements, but one that targeted neuropsychologists like me recently caught my eye. asserted
that → pay → eye
Sponsored by the social justice and advocacy committee of the Hispanic Neuropsychological Society, it invited me to join online training sessions focused on immigration. asserted
it → sponsor → immigration
Specifically, it promised to help me and my peers document illegal immigrants’ “cognitive impairments or severe emotional barriers that may justify exceptions to procedural requirements.” uncertain
that → promise → requirements
The implication was that psychologists could help people avoid deportation. uncertain
people → help → deportation
Concerned about advocacy overriding objectivity in immigration-related psychological practice, I decided to attend four training sessions over the summer. asserted
I → concern → summer
What I saw deeply concerned me about the intellectual integrity of my profession, as well as the strength of the rule of law. asserted
saw → see → law
The sessions focused on “immigration evaluations,” which are mental health assessments, frequently authored by psychologists, that can influence an immigration proceeding. asserted
that → focus → proceeding
They are widely used when deportation is on the table. asserted
deportation → use → table
Several presenters stated that they considered these evaluations a form of social justice advocacy, and one psychologist said that evaluations don’t need to be comprehensive because Immigration and Customs Enforcement attorneys lack the expertise to challenge a psychologist’s conclusions. asserted
attorneys → state → conclusions
It turned out that another presenter had written favorably about psychologists resisting ICE. asserted
presenter → turn → ICE
Altogether, I left the trainings concerned that biased evaluations may be undermining America’s immigration system. uncertain
evaluations → leave → system
In immigration law, a psychologist’s findings can fundamentally alter the outcome of a case. asserted
findings → alter → case
A trauma diagnosis, for instance, supports an illegal immigrant’s claim that they experienced persecution in their country and therefore deserve asylum in the United States. uncertain
they → support → States
Psychological evaluations have been shown to roughly double an immigrant’s chances of a positive outcome. asserted
evaluations → show → outcome
Psychological reports can also explain away credibility-damaging discrepancies in an illegal immigrant’s testimony; psychologists may claim that the errors are due to trauma-related memory distortion. uncertain
errors → explain → distortion
Psychiatric diagnoses are also used to buttress illegal immigrants’ requests for what’s known as an “extreme hardship waiver,” which allows the immigrant to remain in the U.S. rather than be deported if extreme mental or physical hardship to a close relative who is a U.S. resident can be demonstrated. asserted
who → use → relative
U.S. Customs and Immigration Service data show that such waivers had an approval rate approaching 90% in 2025. asserted
waivers → show → 2025
Though humanitarian exceptions to deportation exist for justifiable reasons, Americans should worry that trauma and other mental-health diagnoses are being manufactured by sympathetic psychologists to unfairly aid illegal immigrants. asserted
trauma → exist → immigrants
Recent state changes to licensing laws mean that most psychologists can now conduct telehealth evaluations in most of the nation without leaving their desk, and entrepreneurial practitioners have built group telehealth practices capable of evaluating multiple illegal immigrants daily all over the country. asserted
practitioners → mean → country
One psychologist who markets her practice as uniting families — which raises concerns of bias in her evaluations — claims it has completed more than 34,000 immigration evaluations. uncertain
it → market → evaluations
In May 2026, illegal immigrants filed a class action lawsuit against an immigration attorney in Washington who reportedly served 80,000 immigrants and allegedly sent some to a psychology practice called En Solidaridad for fraudulent psychological evaluations. uncertain
who → file → evaluations
In other forensic arenas, such as personal injury and criminal cases, expert witnesses are commonly retained by both sides to help the trier of fact determine the credibility of each side’s claims. uncertain
trier → retain → claims
But the government infrequently uses experts in immigration cases, which means that biased psychological examinations on behalf of immigrants go mostly unchallenged. asserted
examinations → use → immigrants
A 2025 study showed that although psychologists can assess the veracity of a patient’s symptoms using established credibility tests, only 25% of psychologists conducting immigration evaluations use those tests. asserted
% → show → tests
In forensic psychology, an evaluation that excludes credibility testing is substandard, and substandard analyses are apparently the norm in immigration cases. asserted
analyses → exclude → cases
Only a few years ago, people were paying psychologists to write letters certifying their pets as emotional support animals so they could fly with them on planes. uncertain
they → pay → planes
Initially begun to help people with genuine disabilities, the loophole was abused and eventually reined in by the federal government. asserted
loophole → begin → government
We face a similar situation with immigration evaluations, so the government should take steps to limit abuse. asserted
government → face → abuse
It should restrict evaluations to the most extreme immigration cases, mandate court-overseen credibility testing across the board, and increase prosecutions of unethical psychologists who abuse the system. asserted
who → restrict → system
If such efforts don’t bear fruit, immigration evaluations should be reconsidered altogether, though only as a last resort. asserted
evaluations → bear → resort
Without immediate reform, biased psychological evaluations will continue to undermine both the rule of law and the integrity of the nation’s immigration system. asserted
evaluations → continue → system
Larry Brooks is a board-certified neuropsychologist in Florida. asserted
Brooks → certify → Florida
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support