Photo via The Guardian

‘Cash grab’: One Nation demands up to $630,000 from Victorian election candidates

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Cite

correspondent, S. M. S. (2026, September 27). ‘Cash grab’: One Nation demands up to $630,000 from Victorian election candidates. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2026/sep/27/one-nation-to-demand-thousands-from-victorian-election-candidates-ntwnfb

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Guardian · collected 2026-09-27 · by Sarah Martin Senior correspondent

Quick Summary

One Nation is facing criticism for charging potential Victorian state election candidates significant fees. The party could collect up to $633,000 from applicants, including a non-refundable application fee of $150 and an additional campaign fee of $5,500 if preselected as a candidate. Critics argue this is more akin to a “cash grab” than a genuine selection process, with some alleging that decisions were already made before the alleged application rounds began.
Written by AI on 2026-09-27, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

One Nation, an Australian political party, is facing criticism over its candidate selection process ahead of the November Victorian state election. The party reportedly received 1,209 expressions of interest from potential candidates but only about 220 progressed to a final stage. Those who reached this stage were required to pay a non-refundable application fee of $150, which could generate up to an estimated $33,000 for the party if all applicants paid. Additionally, full members must pay at least $60 annually, adding another potential $72,000. Critics are calling this a “pay-to-play” scheme and accuse One Nation of conducting a "cash grab." Former councillors, mayors, and deputy mayors who applied but were rejected have voiced concerns about the process's fairness.

Written for “Election Funding Demands Victoria” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Election Funding Demands Victoria
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 10% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Sydney Morning Herald
Hedges 1 of 7 claims Outlet record 61/100
“The articles discuss different topics related to One Nation, with Article A covering potential political deals and discussions before an election, while Article B discusses financial practices concerning candidates for a Victorian state election.”
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 3 of 50 claims Outlet record 61/100
“Article A discusses One Nation's 'cash grab' application fees from potential Victorian election candidates, while Article B talks about the Liberal Party facing a backlash in the marginal seat of Pakenham due to preselection issues.”
ABC News (AU)
Hedges 2 of 81 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of One Nation's practices, with Article A focusing on internal party operations and Ms Game's criticism, while Article B specifically reports on a 'cash grab' demand from the party in relation to Victorian election candidates.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
30
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
10%
3 of 30 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
The Guardian's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-27 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Guardian · 2736 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Sarah Martin Senior correspondent
2 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 One Nation could collect as much as $633,000 from people who have put their hand up to run in the Victorian state election, with potential candidates questioning whether the party is staging a “cash grab”.
🔮 Hanson said the vehicle would help the party’s campaign efforts and “provides us the presence we need in the lead-up to the next federal election”.
Also by Sarah Martin Senior correspondent
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Guardian Guardian Australia One Nation Victoria Victorian

Subjects

One Nation ORG · 8× Guardian ORG · 4× Victoria GPE · 2× Victorian NORP · 2× Aidan McLindon PERSON · 1× Guardian Australia ORG · 1× McLindon PERSON · 1× One Nation’s ORG · 1× The Populist ORG · 1× Warren Pickering PERSON · 1×

Narrative

One Nation told the Guardian that 1,209 people put in an expression of interest to run in the November state election, and approximately 220 proceeded to the final stage, resulting in an estimated $33,000 flowing into party coffers if all final stage candidates paid this amount.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-27
🔮 One Nation could collect as much as $633,000 from people who have put their hand up to run in the Victorian state election, with potential candidates questioning whether the party is staging a “cash grab”.

Claims (30 extracted, 3 hedged)

One Nation could collect as much as $633,000 from people who have put their hand up to run in the Victorian state election, with potential candidates questioning whether the party is staging a “cash grab”. uncertain
party → collect → grab
Guardian Australia has spoken to multiple former councillors, mayors and deputy mayors who expressed an interest in running for the party. asserted
who → speak → party
They claim they went through what one called a “pay-to-play” application process, after which they were rejected. uncertain
they → claim → which
Those who applied to be considered were required to pay $150 as a “non refundable application fee”, invoices seen by the Guardian show. asserted
invoices → apply → Guardian
One Nation told the Guardian that 1,209 people put in an expression of interest to run in the November state election, and approximately 220 proceeded to the final stage, resulting in an estimated $33,000 flowing into party coffers if all final stage candidates paid this amount. asserted
candidates → tell → amount
Applicants were also expected to be party members, with this translating to an additional $72,000 based on the minimum membership fee of $60 a year. asserted
this → expect → 60
In addition, candidates were advised in interviews that they would be required to pay $5,500 of their own money to run if preselected, even though the vast majority of lower house electorates are not deemed winnable. asserted
majority → advise → electorates
While it is not uncommon for the major parties to require candidates to pay an application fee, they do not levy campaign fees on candidates like those being charged by One Nation. asserted
they → require → Nation
The candidate fee will bring $528,000 into the party’s coffers, based on running 88 lower house candidates and eight for the upper house. asserted
fee → bring → house
In total, the amount paid by candidates could be as much as $633,000. uncertain
amount → pay → candidates
Aidan McLindon, a political consultant who worked with One Nation in Victoria last year, said many potential candidates had been left frustrated by what appeared to be a “money-spinning exercise”. asserted
what → work → Victoria
One Nation was “disproportionately focusing on profits over policy”. asserted
Nation → focus → policy
McLindon said in an interview for episode three of The Populist, out on Monday. asserted
McLindon → say → Monday
Based on the party’s polling numbers, One Nation is also in line to receive as much as $10m through Victoria’s public electoral funding scheme. asserted
Nation → base → scheme
Applicants who spoke to the Guardian have questioned whether the application process was genuine, saying the party had conducted 15-minute video interviews with each candidate before a decision was made. asserted
decision → speak → candidate
Potential candidates were all required to sign non-disclosure agreements about the process on application. asserted
candidates → require → application
There is also concern that the upper house candidates were “captain’s picks” selected by the party’s state leader, Warren Pickering, with One Nation overlooking candidates with significant local government and professional experience. asserted
Nation → be → experience
A complaint letter sent to the party by one former Victorian mayor says the process has left many candidates feeling “that we were used, lied to, misled and gaslit”. asserted
we → send → candidates
“The issue is that the process increasingly looks as though it was used as cover to conceal decisions that had already been substantially made, while creating the public appearance of an open, merit-based candidate search,” the letter seen by the Guardian states. asserted
letter → look → Guardian
“Applicants should not have been encouraged to invest their time, energy, reputations and personal information in an elaborate exercise merely to provide legitimacy, numbers or political cover for what now appears to have been a biased and self-serving leadership process.” asserted
what → encourage → legitimacy
Another local government member who had applied questioned whether the process was a “cash grab”. asserted
process → apply → ?
“They are asking everyday folk, hard-working mums and dads, for $5,500 which is a lot of money,” one said. asserted
one → ask → money
“I just think it is a cash grab for the federal election. asserted
it → think → election
My feeling is they are just using all of the states to fundraise for the federal election where they want to take power.” asserted
they → use → power
Another said they believed that under the party’s constitution, all funds would be transferred to One Nation’s Brisbane headquarters. asserted
funds → say → headquarters
“They will get $800,000 in the kitty for doing absolutely nothing,” one said. asserted
one → get → nothing
A spokesperson for One Nation said the party uses “a nominal cost recovery model to do police and other checks on candidate nominees”. asserted
party → say → nominees
“All candidate fees have been paid into the Victorian state campaign account in accordance with the Victorian Electoral Commission rules. asserted
fees → pay → rules
“Application fees and campaign contributions are a standard requirement implemented by all major parties within Australia.” asserted
fees → implement → Australia
The Guardian has previously reported that candidates at the 2025 federal election were left out of pocket by the party’s candidate funding agreements. asserted
candidates → report → agreements
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support