Photo via Washington Examiner

Montana just found the legal cheat code to kill Citizens United

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Wargotz, E. (2026, September 27). Montana just found the legal cheat code to kill Citizens United. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/op-eds/4736131/montana-initiative-194-citizens-united/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-09-27 · by Eric Wargotz

Quick Summary

Montana voters are considering Initiative 194, also known as “The Montana Plan,” which aims to ban corporations and unions from spending money on state elections. This proposal leverages Montana's historical skepticism towards corporate influence in politics, particularly stemming from the early 20th century "Copper King" era when corporate entities wielded significant political power. The initiative seeks to navigate around the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision by asserting that states have the authority under the 10th Amendment to define what powers corporations can exercise within their borders. This approach could potentially set a new precedent for regulating corporate influence in politics at the state level, despite expected challenges from business groups and legal skepticism about its constitutionality.
Written by AI on 2026-09-27, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Montana voters will decide on Initiative 194, also known as "The Montana Plan," which aims to ban corporations, labor unions, and other artificial legal entities from spending money in state elections. This initiative tests whether local laws can override national precedents like the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. FEC, which allowed unlimited corporate political spending. Despite Montana being a stronghold for the Republican Party, where President Trump won by nearly 20 percentage points in 2024, grassroots advocates are using the state's history of battling against corporate influence to push this radical proposal. The initiative addresses concerns over "dark money" — untraceable funds that flow through opaque corporate structures into political campaigns. Montana’s historical context, where corporations once wielded immense power during the Copper King era, makes the current movement against corporate spending resonate deeply with voters concerned about preserving democratic integrity.

Written for “Montana Campaign Finance Law” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Montana Campaign Finance Law
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
47
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
9%
4 of 47 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
70/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-27 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 3988 article(s) · 7 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 7 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Eric Wargotz
46 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 MAGA has become the central pillar holding up the modern Right, meaning its exit would pull down the entire architecture.
2026-10-31 · assertive framing · MAGA won the party. It just lost the math
🔮 The timing of this rapidly unfolding development could not be more dangerous.
🔮 But right now, all these conflicting voices in his ear, the domestic polling, and the foreign pressure might just be clouding his judgment.
🔮 A highly active, independent 85-year-old with multiple risk factors might experience significant, long-term survival benefits from continuous lipid management.
🔮 When we — whether ordinary citizens or high-level officials — flirt with systemic collapse simply because we despise the current administration, we play with a fire that will consume everyone.
🔮 National surveys published by the Pew Research Center Climate Pessimism Study document that roughly 60% of Americans express deep anxiety that global actors will fail to mitigate the worst environmental impacts due to political division.
2026-10-09 · assertive framing · The climate war’s dumbest lie: Jobs vs. nature
🔮 If your only window into the American soul is the nightly cable news broadcast, you would assume we are a nation completely irreconcilable, locked in a permanent cultural cold war.
🔮 Meanwhile, Trump boldly cut through the bureaucratic panic, signaling that the White House has no appetite for heavy-handed domestic regulations that would cripple our edge and stating that our primary guardrails remain the rule of law and the Department of Justice.
🔮 When we look at this disparity under the microscope, we find that it is neither a failure of individual willpower nor a consequence of an isolated genetic pool.
🔮 Every single time I hit “send” on a new draft, a cynical voice in my head asks the exact same questions: Will the editor accept this, as they’re overwhelmed with tons of these a day?
Also by Eric Wargotz
MAGA won the party. It just lost the math
2026-10-31 · Washington Examiner
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 46 articles by Eric Wargotz →

Topics

Initiative 194 Montana Montanans Republican Party the Supreme Court’s

Subjects

Montana ORG · 3× Citizens United ORG · 2× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× FEC ORG · 1× Montanans NORP · 1× Republican Party ORG · 1× Supreme Court ORG · 1× the Supreme Court’s ORG · 1× the Transparent Election Initiative ORG · 1×

Narrative

Under Initiative 194, also known as “The Montana Plan,” voters will decide whether to completely bar corporations, labor unions, and other artificial legal entities from spending money on state elections, testing whether local frameworks can withstand national scrutiny.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-27
🔮 Yet, grassroots advocates are looking to the state’s unique political heritage to advance proposals that could radically alter the political landscape.
2026-09-27 · Washington Examiner
Montana just found the legal cheat code to kill Citizens United · assertive framing

Claims (47 extracted, 4 hedged)

When political analysts look at Montana, they see a reliable stronghold of the modern Republican Party. asserted
they → look → Party
This is a state that President Donald Trump carried by nearly 20 percentage points in 2024, a place where conservative populism runs deep in the soil. asserted
populism → carry → soil
Yet, grassroots advocates are looking to the state’s unique political heritage to advance proposals that could radically alter the political landscape. uncertain
that → look → landscape
Under Initiative 194, also known as “The Montana Plan,” voters will decide whether to completely bar corporations, labor unions, and other artificial legal entities from spending money on state elections, testing whether local frameworks can withstand national scrutiny. asserted
frameworks → know → scrutiny
The concept taps into a brewing, cross-partisan fury over the pervasiveness of so-called “dark money” — the untraceable millions flowing into political campaigns through opaque corporate structures. asserted
concept → tap → structures
To outsiders, a red state leading the charge against corporate political speech might seem paradoxical. uncertain
state → lead → speech
But to anyone familiar with Montana’s history, it makes perfect sense. asserted
it → make → sense
This is a state where corporate “robber barons” once ran wild, buying judges and legislatures during the Copper King era of the early 20th century. asserted
barons → run → century
Montanans have a long, proud history of fierce institutional skepticism toward money in politics. asserted
Montanans → have → politics
Now, they are using that history to pioneer a novel legal strategy that could trigger a national domino effect. uncertain
that → use → effect
What makes this emerging framework revolutionary is its procedural maneuver around federal jurisprudence. asserted
framework → make → jurisprudence
For over a decade, traditional campaign finance reform has slammed into a legal brick wall: the Supreme Court’s landmark 2010 Citizens United v. FEC decision. asserted
reform → slam → FEC
That ruling established that independent political spending is a form of free speech protected by the First Amendment, effectively granting corporations the same political speech rights as living, breathing citizens. asserted
spending → establish → citizens
Rather than challenging Citizens United head-on, a strategy doomed to fail before the current conservative supermajority, this new approach attacks the problem from the flank. asserted
approach → challenge → flank
It shifts the legal battlefield from corporate rights to corporate powers. asserted
It → shift → powers
Under the 10th Amendment, state governments possess the absolute authority to charter corporations and define the legal scope of what those “artificial persons” are allowed to do. asserted
persons → possess → what
Proponents argue that while a person has an inherent right to free speech, a corporation only has the powers granted to it by the state. asserted
corporation → argue → state
By stripping political spending from the approved list of corporate powers, advocates are testing whether states can regulate the entity itself, rather than the speech. asserted
states → strip → entity
A high-stakes Supreme Court challenge is virtually guaranteed if such measures are successfully enacted. asserted
measures → guarantee → ?
Business groups and opponents have already denounced these strategies as flatly unconstitutional. asserted
groups → denounce → strategies
Legal scholars are fiercely divided on how the nation’s highest court will react. asserted
court → divide → ?
Skeptics view the strategy as a transparent “end run” around Citizens United that a conservative court will eagerly strike down. asserted
court → view → that
However, constitutional optimists note that the strategy forces the conservative block into an uncomfortable ideological corner. asserted
strategy → note → corner
The justices will be forced to choose between two core conservative tenets: protecting corporate political expression or upholding federalism and a state’s 10th Amendment right to govern its own corporate charters. asserted
justices → force → charters
If the court rules against such state regulations, it will have to explicitly declare that federal corporate speech rights override a state’s fundamental sovereignty over its own creation. asserted
rights → rule → creation
Movement organizers at the Transparent Election Initiative note that variations of this corporate charter-power strategy are active or under consideration in more than 30 states, creating a bipartisan populist front across the country. asserted
variations → note → country
Citizens looking to follow these developments can consult official state portals to verify the status of legislative proposals and charter-power frameworks across the country. asserted
Citizens → look → country
On the opposite coast, the reform group Honest Elections Oregon filed a near-identical constitutional amendment for its state’s November 2028 ballot. asserted
group → file → ballot
Meanwhile, states such as Michigan, California, and Alaska are independently advancing their own variations of campaign finance restrictions, targeting everything from utility company political contributions to foreign-influenced corporate spending. asserted
states → advance → spending
The unusual coalitions forming around these measures prove that the fatigue over campaign finance has transcended traditional partisan boundaries. asserted
fatigue → form → boundaries
This broad, cross-partisan alliance features high-profile state leaders like former Republican Gov. Marc Racicot, standing alongside populist progressive figures. asserted
alliance → feature → figures
To track active campaign finance measures, petition filings, and upcoming ballot schedules in Montana, citizens can verify current initiatives and leadership details directly through the Montana secretary of state’s office and official state voter portals. asserted
citizens → track → office
These movements are united by a simple, universal truth: When anonymous corporate entities can dump unlimited sums into an election, the voices of actual voters are completely drowned out. asserted
voices → unite → voters
Critics of such measures argue that barring corporations from political spending is an unfair restriction that prevents local businesses from defending themselves against harmful regulations. asserted
that → argue → regulations
They contend that in a modern economy, policy decisions directly impact a company’s survival, and businesses must have a seat at the electoral table. asserted
businesses → contend → table
But this argument fundamentally misunderstands the nature of the crisis. asserted
argument → misunderstand → crisis
This reform model does not prevent small business owners, corporate executives, or union members from spending their own hard-earned money to support candidates or causes. asserted
model → prevent → candidates
It simply demands that they do so transparently, under their own names, as citizens. asserted
they → demand → citizens
What it stops is the practice of hiding behind a shell corporation or a generic LLC to drop half a million dollars into a local race without accountability. asserted
stops → stop → accountability
It restores a level playing field where human beings, not paper entities, decide elections. asserted
beings → restore → elections
…and 7 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support