Photo via Dawn

War in the Gulf

Read the original at Dawn ↗
Cite

Chaudhry, A. A. (2026, September 27). War in the Gulf. Dawn. https://www.dawn.com/news/2032959/war-in-the-gulf

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Dawn · collected 2026-09-27 · by Aizaz Ahmad Chaudhry

Quick Summary

The article reports that a recent 40-day war initiated by the United States and Israel against Iran in February failed to achieve its objectives, despite killing much of Iran's leadership and damaging facilities. While the stated purpose was to prevent Iran from building nuclear weapons, the text claims this was merely a pretext; the real aim may have been regime change due to Iran's opposition to Israeli expansionist goals. The conflict led to significant setbacks for both the US and Israel, including damaged relations with Gulf states and questions about American military dominance in the region.
Written by AI on 2026-10-02, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

The US and Israel initiated military actions against Iran in 2025, intending to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. Despite these efforts, Iran remained compliant with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) safeguards and did not violate the 2015 nuclear deal it had agreed upon. President Donald Trump's decision to withdraw the US from this agreement in 2018 set off a series of escalations.

In June 2025, after ongoing negotiations failed, Israel launched an attack on Iran, leading to a brief 12-day conflict. This was followed by a more extensive joint operation by the US and Israel starting February 28, which lasted for 40 days. The strikes killed significant parts of the Iranian leadership and heavily damaged infrastructure.

Throughout these conflicts, Iran continued adhering to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and maintained its stance against pursuing a nuclear weapon program under directives from Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Critics argue that Iran’s supposed nuclear ambitions were merely a pretext for military intervention aimed at regime change.

Written for “War in the Gulf” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 War in the Gulf
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly left and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Al Jazeera
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Article A reports on an address given by Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian at the UN General Assembly regarding Iran's stance on the Strait of Hormuz, while Article B discusses a broader context and implications of an ongoing war between US/Israel and Iran.”
The Straits Times
Hedges 1 of 20 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A reports on an interview given by the Iranian president during UN General Assembly meetings where he calls for dialogue to end conflict, while Article B discusses the broader context and failure of a war imposed by US and Israel on Iran.”
Dawn
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 2 of 25 claims Outlet record 72/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the broader conflict: Article A focuses on Iran's stance regarding the Strait of Hormuz and the US rejection, while Article B provides a historical overview of the war's origins and objectives.”
The Independent
Hedges 4 of 40 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles refer to different time periods and events related to US-Iran relations; Article A describes a recent meeting and threat by Trump, while Article B discusses an ongoing war and failed objectives from previous years.”
Al Jazeera
Hedges 1 of 2 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different stages of a broader conflict, not the same specific incident.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this Hedges 2 of 30 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the ongoing conflict with Iran, with Article A focusing on the failure of military objectives and Article B highlighting Trump's strategy as effective.”
The Independent
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 5 of 46 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the broader conflict, with Article A focusing on the failure of the war objectives and historical context, while Article B specifically addresses Trump's denial regarding sanctions relief offers to Iran.”
The Independent
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 7 of 43 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the broader conflict; Article A focuses on oil supply and prices during the war, while Article B provides a historical and political context for the war's causes.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 4 of 28 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A describes Iran's diplomatic initiative at the UN General Assembly to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and end hostilities, while Article B discusses a broader context of war between the US/Israel and Iran.”
The Hindu
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 2 of 30 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different stages of the ongoing conflict between Iran and the US-Israel alliance. Article A discusses the failure of objectives from an earlier period, while Article B focuses on recent developments regarding Iran's conditions for reopening the Strait of Hormuz.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
37
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 37 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
72/100
Dawn's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-27 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Dawn · 2546 article(s) · 3 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 3 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Aizaz Ahmad Chaudhry
2 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 And will this bonhomie last?
2026-10-25 · assertive framing · Pak-US reset?
🔮 It had also willingly agreed to a nuclear deal in 2015.
2026-09-27 · assertive framing · War in the Gulf
Also by Aizaz Ahmad Chaudhry
Pak-US reset?
2026-10-25 · Dawn
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Hamas Iran Iranian Israel Israeli

Subjects

Iran GPE · 18× Israel GPE · 7× Iranian NORP · 4× America GPE · 3× Israeli NORP · 3× Hamas ORG · 2× Houthis NORP · 2× Pakistan GPE · 2× Trump PERSON · 2× IAEA ORG · 1×

Narrative

All this while Iran remained in the NPT and maintained that it was not building a nuclear bomb, thanks in large measure to a directive from Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei to not pursue a nuclear weapon programme.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-27
🔮 It had also willingly agreed to a nuclear deal in 2015.
2026-09-27 · Dawn
War in the Gulf · assertive framing

Claims (37 extracted, 0 hedged)

THE war that the US and Israel imposed on Iran this year has failed to achieve any of the objectives that the two countries had intended. asserted
countries → impose → that
The declared purpose was to prevent Iran from building a nuclear weapon. asserted
purpose → declare → weapon
A fact-check indicates that Iran had kept its civil nuclear programme under IAEA safeguards. asserted
Iran → indicate → safeguards
It had also willingly agreed to a nuclear deal in 2015. asserted
It → agree → 2015
It was President Donald Trump who pulled the US out of the deal in 2018 and re-engaged with Iran in his second term under a “maximum pressure” campaign. asserted
who → pull → campaign
While talks were still underway, Israel attacked Iran in June 2025, resulting in a 12-day war. asserted
Israel → attack → war
Having failed to subdue Iran, the US and Israel launched joint strikes on Iran on Feb 28, this year, killing much of the Iranian leadership and relentlessly bombing Iranian facilities and installations for 40 days. asserted
US → fail → days
All this while Iran remained in the NPT and maintained that it was not building a nuclear bomb, thanks in large measure to a directive from Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei to not pursue a nuclear weapon programme. asserted
it → remain → programme
This means that Tehran’s nuclear programme was only a pretext to attack Iran this year. asserted
programme → mean → Iran
Arguably, the real objective of the February strike was to change the ruling regime in Iran. asserted
objective → change → Iran
It would be recalled that by 2020, many Arab countries had joined the Abraham Accords and normalised relations with Israel. asserted
countries → recall → Israel
Lest the Palestinian cause be forgotten, Hamas mounted a resistance attack on Israel in October 2023, which was used by the Benjamin Netanyahu government to bomb Gaza to rubble, committing horrific genocide. asserted
which → forget → genocide
Having weakened Hamas and Hezbollah, Israel began to entertain the idea of establishing a ‘Greater Israel’ and found the Iranian regime to be a major roadblock to its ambitions. asserted
regime → weaken → ambitions
Since his efforts to dislodge Iran’s government had failed in June 2025, Netanyahu persuaded Trump to undertake a joint attack against Iran on Feb 28. asserted
Netanyahu → dislodge → Feb
Two factors seem to have encouraged Trump to accept this gamble. asserted
factors → seem → gamble
He had successfully dislodged the government of president Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela in January, and Iran had witnessed massive protests against the government on account of inflation. asserted
Iran → dislodge → inflation
The US and Israeli leadership wrongly assessed that they would be able to wipe out the Iranian regime within days. asserted
they → assess → days
They also failed to destroy Iran’s long-range missile programme, though they did succeed in weakening Iran’s Axis of Resistance. asserted
they → fail → Resistance
While Iran has survived the American and Israeli onslaught, the war has been nothing less than a disaster for the US itself. asserted
war → survive → US
The Gulf states are increasingly becoming disillusioned with America’s capacity or will to provide them with security. asserted
states → become → security
The US bases in the region have been practically destroyed. asserted
bases → destroy → region
The myth of invincibility of the US military machine has been shattered. asserted
myth → shatter → machine
The Strait of Hormuz, which was open before the war, is now being contested. asserted
which → contest → war
The war is expanding horizontally, with Iraqi militias targeting Saudi Arabia’s east-west pipeline and Yemen’s Houthis attacking Saudi cities and oil installations. asserted
Houthis → expand → cities
Bab al-Mandeb also runs the risk of closure as the Houthis have captured all key positions and islands along the Red Sea. asserted
Houthis → run → Sea
With oil prices soaring, most countries have run into serious economic difficulties. asserted
countries → soar → difficulties
The Gulf countries, whose economies largely depended on energy flows, tourism, and services, have been shaken to the core. asserted
economies → depend → core
Meanwhile, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Turkiye have entered into a regional arrangement for joint defence, predicated on the principle of collective security. asserted
Pakistan → enter → security
With Israeli parliamentary elections due on Oct 27 and mid-term Congressional elections in America on Nov 3, the US is contemplating how best to handle the war with Iran. asserted
US → contemplate → Iran
One way is to revert to the MoU that was mediated by Pakistan and signed in June by the presidents of the US and Iran. asserted
that → revert → US
However, the MoU had received severe criticism within the US and was largely interpreted as capitulation by the US. asserted
MoU → receive → US
Ever since, Trump has pulled back from any peace attempts. asserted
Trump → pull → attempts
The other option being considered is to resort to another large-scale military attack. asserted
option → consider → attack
Given what had happened in the earlier military campaigns, it can be safely assumed that another confrontation is unlikely to yield a different result. asserted
confrontation → give → result
Pakistan, Qatar, and others must continue their efforts for peace. asserted
Pakistan → continue → peace
Secondly, it is time for China to step in as a mediator as it depends heavily on oil flows from the Gulf and had successfully brokered normalisation between Iran and Saudi Arabia in 2023. asserted
it → step → 2023
China should also impress upon the US leadership the futility of finding a military solution to the crisis in the Gulf region. asserted
China → impress → region
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support