Photo via Fox News

Human vs. ChatGPT NFL Week 3 betting picks: can AI recover from its ugly 2-8 start to the season?

Read the original at Fox News ↗
Cite

Zaksheske, D. (2026, September 27). Human vs. ChatGPT NFL Week 3 betting picks: can AI recover from its ugly 2-8 start to the season? Fox News. https://www.foxnews.com/outkick-sports/human-vs-chatgpt-nfl-week-3-betting-picks-can-ai-recover-ugly-2-8-start-season

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Fox News · collected 2026-09-27 · by Dan Zaksheske

Quick Summary

This article reports on a competition between human betting picks and those generated by AI (ChatGPT) for NFL Week 3 games after two weeks of play. ChatGPT has a poor record at 2-8, while the writer is at 5-5. The piece outlines specific bets made by both the writer and ChatGPT for Week 3, emphasizing an upcoming Giants game where the human picks the home team to cover the spread against Tennessee.
Written by AI on 2026-10-02, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In Week 3 of NFL betting, Dan Zaksheske and ChatGPT made their picks based on odds from Saturday, Sept. 26. After a poor start where GPT went 0-5 in Week 1 and then 2-8 overall, it managed to pick two games correctly in Week 2 but still fell short at .500 with Dan at 5-5. For Week 3, Zaksheske is backing the Pittsburgh Steelers getting 3½ points against Cincinnati due to GPT's opposing view and the Steelers' defensive improvement compared to a struggling offense from Cincinnati. The rules involve betting five games each week, with odds no worse than -120, and all bets sized to win one unit.

Written for “AI Football Betting Picks” on 2026-11-02, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 AI Football Betting Picks
Technology · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 4% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
New York Post
Hedges 0 of 12 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different betting contexts and events; one compares human vs AI picks with a focus on Steelers vs. Cincinnati, while the other offers bonus bets for Jets vs. Lions.”
New York Post
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles are about NFL Week 3 predictions but from different perspectives and formats involving human experts versus AI.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
98
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
4%
4 of 98 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
69/100
Fox News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Technology
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-27 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Fox News · 6241 article(s) · 11 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 11 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Dan Zaksheske
55 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Gabby Williams scored 28 of her 30 points in the second half and was named Finals MVP.
🔮 Golden State guard Gabby Williams delivered the performance Atlanta needed from its star.
🔮 Not even a radically left-wing church choir could get the players to stand on the court for two minutes during the anthem.
🔮 The WNBA expanded to best-of-seven in 2025, and this year's Game 5 began with the series tied 2-2, so neither team could clinch the title.
🔮 Indianapolis’ passing struggles, Jacksonville’s strong run defense and forecast wind support a limited Colts contribution.
🔮 Their shooting also ensured that the WNBA’s championship would be decided in prime time.
🔮 For one man attending with a female Dream fan, the question was more complicated. Asked whether he considered the absences disrespectful, he said, "Me personally, maybe a little bit."
🔮 Hayes, who said he lives in Florida, could make the early start work, but he expressed concern for the people who couldn’t.
🔮 This page may contain affiliate links to legal sports betting partners.
🔮 Game 6 between the Atlanta Dream and Golden State Valkyries will tip off at 12:30 p.m. ET Thursday at State Farm Arena, rather than its originally scheduled 8 p.m. start.
Also by Dan Zaksheske
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 55 articles by Dan Zaksheske →

Topics

Chargers GPT New York Giants Pittsburgh Steelers Steelers

Subjects

GPT ORG · 6× Giants ORG · 5× Dan PERSON · 4× New York Giants ORG · 4× Pittsburgh Steelers ORG · 4× Chargers ORG · 2× Chicago Bears ORG · 2× Jameis Winston PERSON · 2× Steelers ORG · 2× Tennessee ORG · 2×

Narrative

I’m backing Cincinnati because its improved defensive front faces a struggling Steelers offense, while Joey Porter Jr. and Jamel Dean are questionable against Joe Burrow, Ja’Marr Chase and Tee Higgins.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-27
🔮 The Browns rewarded our willingness to back them after an ugly opener by beating Tampa Bay outright, while the Panthers and Falcons comfortably stayed under the total with 37 combined points.

Claims (98 extracted, 4 hedged)

After going 0-5 in Week 1, GPT finally picked a game correctly. asserted
GPT → go → game
Actually, it picked two! asserted
it → pick → two
But it still went under .500 and is now a dreadful 2-8 on the season. asserted
it → go → season
I'm exactly .500 at 5-5, which isn't awesome, but looks fantastic next to GPT's putrid 20% win rate. asserted
which → look → rate
It also makes me feel a lot better about backing the Steelers getting 3½ points against Cincinnati in Week 3, since AI is on the opposite side. asserted
AI → make → side
The rules remain the same. asserted
rules → remain → ?
ChatGPT and I each make our five best bets using the same set of odds, and no selection can be priced worse than -120. asserted
selection → make → -120
Every wager is sized to win one unit, which means a bet at -110 risks 1.10 units to win one, while a bet at +110 risks 0.91 units to win one. asserted
bet → size → one
Odds were captured Saturday, Sept. 26, at 6 p.m. ET. asserted
Odds → capture → ET
Before we get to the Week 3 picks, let’s review last week. asserted
’s → get → picks
The Browns rewarded our willingness to back them after an ugly opener by beating Tampa Bay outright, while the Panthers and Falcons comfortably stayed under the total with 37 combined points. asserted
Panthers → reward → points
I'm going to whine about Jayden Daniels getting hurt, because that certainly didn't help our Commanders bet. asserted
that → go → bet
Green Bay was fortunate to win at all, and the Chargers made me look really dumb for expecting a bounce-back performance. asserted
me → win → performance
We leaned heavily on the idea that the betting market overreacted to Week 1. asserted
market → lean → Week
Week 2 reminded us that sometimes a team looks bad because it is bad. asserted
it → remind → us
We learned from those mistakes, and we're ready to get back on track in Week 3. asserted
we → learn → Week
After going 0-5 in Week 1, GPT improved by going 2-3 in Week 2. asserted
GPT → go → Week
Both unders cashed easily, with the Steelers and Patriots combining for 23 points and the Vikings and Bears managing just 12. asserted
Vikings → cash → 12
Jacksonville lost by seven, the Giants got blown out by 22 and Kansas City needed overtime to beat Indianapolis by three. asserted
City → lose → three
This is what's known as a "plug your nose" bet. asserted
what → know → bet
It doesn't feel great to back the Giants after they just lost quarterback Jaxson Dart for the rest of the regular season and Jameis Winston looked atrocious in his stead. asserted
Winston → feel → stead
However, with a week preparing as the starter, I expect Winston to be better and the Giants to rally around their backup QB. asserted
Giants → prepare → QB
Plus, I just don't think Tennessee is very good. asserted
Tennessee → think → ?
GPT’s analysis: Getting the Giants below a field goal is the appeal, and Malik Nabers being cleared gives Jameis Winston his most important receiving option. asserted
cleared → get → option
My concern is trusting New York to create separation with a replacement quarterback on a short week. asserted
concern → trust → week
Brian Burns, Deonte Banks and Tyler Nubin are questionable, while Tennessee’s running game offers a way to keep this close. asserted
game → offer → this
I passed because the Giants’ defensive uncertainty outweighs the attractive number. asserted
uncertainty → pass → number
This is definitely a "fade the public" type bet. asserted
This → fade → public
The Steelers haven't looked good in either of their two games, despite being 1-1, and the Bengals look like legitimate Super Bowl contenders. asserted
Bengals → look → contenders
So, why are we backing Pittsburgh? asserted
we → back → Pittsburgh
I love getting 3½ points at home in a divisional matchup. asserted
I → love → matchup
With everyone expecting Cincinnati to roll Pittsburgh, I'll grab the points. asserted
I → expect → points
GPT’s analysis: The extra half-point is valuable in a matchup Pittsburgh’s defense could turn into a field-goal game. uncertain
defense → turn → game
I’m backing Cincinnati because its improved defensive front faces a struggling Steelers offense, while Joey Porter Jr. and Jamel Dean are questionable against Joe Burrow, Ja’Marr Chase and Tee Higgins. asserted
Jr. → back → Burrow
Pittsburgh can cover without winning, but I trust Cincinnati’s paths to creating a margin more. asserted
I → cover → margin
Honestly, the Vikings have been at their best with Kyler Murray not playing quarterback, and he's back to starting in Week 3. asserted
he → play → Week
This just feels like the Vikings are a pretty fraudulent 2-0 and the Bucs are probably not quite as bad as their 0-2 record suggests. uncertain
record → feel → ?
The lookahead line prior to Week 2 favored the Bucs, so I think we're getting a lot of value with Tampa as a home dog. asserted
we → favor → dog
The Vikings have not consistently sustained offense, and Tampa Bay has left scoring opportunities unfinished. asserted
Bay → sustain → opportunities
I also prefer the Buccaneers moneyline to taking just one point. asserted
I → prefer → point
…and 58 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support