Photo via Washington Examiner

Without the Jones Act, communist China could crew the Mississippi

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Landrith, G. (2026, September 27). Without the Jones Act, communist China could crew the Mississippi. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/op-eds/4740588/jones-act-national-security-inland-waterways-china/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-09-27 · by George Landrith

Quick Summary

Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy has emphasized the importance of ensuring that only qualified drivers operate commercial vehicles on U.S. highways. This raises concerns about maritime safety, particularly regarding foreign vessels operating in U.S. waters. The article highlights the Jones Act's role in requiring ships carrying goods between two U.S. points to be built, owned by, and crewed with Americans, emphasizing its national-security implications. It underscores that while foreign ships can enter American ports for international trade, they cannot operate domestically within U.S. inland waterways or make multiple stops at different ports, a distinction aimed at protecting critical infrastructure.
Written by AI on 2026-09-27, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

The Washington Examiner discusses the potential national security risks associated with allowing foreign vessels to operate within U.S. waters under the Jones Act. The act requires that ships carrying goods between U.S. ports be built in America, owned by Americans, and crewed primarily by American mariners. Without it, China could potentially use its vessels to transport cargo along critical waterways like the Mississippi River. This raises concerns about security, as foreign-flagged ships might not adhere to stringent safety standards or be subject to thorough oversight, posing risks to infrastructure such as bridges, pipelines, and chemical plants. The article highlights a 2024 incident in Baltimore where a Singapore-registered ship lost power and struck a bridge, underscoring the severe consequences of maritime failures.

Written for “Jones Act And Chinese Shipping” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Jones Act And Chinese Shipping
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
48
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
8%
4 of 48 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
70/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-27 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 3988 article(s) · 7 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 7 correction(s)

Who wrote this

George Landrith
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Domestic vessels move through areas containing bridges, pipelines, petroleum facilities, chemical plants, and other critical infrastructure. But there is a meaningful security difference between permitting foreign vessels to deliver international commerce to American ports and turning routine domestic commerce between American points over to foreign-flagged vessels whose ownership structures, employment systems, and flag-state oversight may be based abroad.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

America American Transportation U.S. the Jones Act

Subjects

American NORP · 10× America GPE · 4× U.S. GPE · 2× Americans NORP · 1× Baltimore ORG · 1× Sean Duffy PERSON · 1× Singapore GPE · 1× The National Transportation Safety Board ORG · 1× Transportation ORG · 1× U.S.-built GPE · 1×

Narrative

Congressional Research Service analysis describes the national-security goals behind the Jones Act as maintaining three things: a U.S.-controlled commercial fleet that can supplement military sealift, an American merchant-mariner workforce capable of crewing reserve military vessels, and domestic shipbuilding and repair capacity.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-27
🔮 Domestic vessels move through areas containing bridges, pipelines, petroleum facilities, chemical plants, and other critical infrastructure. But there is a meaningful security difference between permitting foreign vessels to deliver international commerce to American ports and turning routine domestic commerce between American points over to foreign-flagged vessels whose ownership structures, employment systems, and flag-state oversight may be based abroad.
2026-09-27 · Washington Examiner
Without the Jones Act, communist China could crew the Mississippi · assertive framing

Claims (48 extracted, 4 hedged)

Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy has made commercial-driver safety a major priority, tightening the rules governing non-domiciled commercial driver’s licenses and requiring more reliable verification that foreign-domiciled drivers are legally eligible and qualified to operate enormous commercial vehicles on American highways. asserted
drivers → make → highways
That raises an important parallel question: If we care about who is operating an 80,000-pound tractor-trailer on an American interstate, shouldn’t we care at least as much about hostile nations that operate massive commercial vessels carrying cargo through America’s ports, rivers, and inland waterways? asserted
that → raise → ports
The potential consequences of a maritime failure can dwarf those of even a catastrophic highway accident. asserted
consequences → dwarf → accident
A large oceangoing vessel can weigh tens of thousands of tons and carry enormous quantities of fuel, chemicals, containers, or other cargo. asserted
vessel → weigh → fuel
A loss of propulsion or steering can threaten bridges, ports, refineries, waterfront communities, and environmentally sensitive waterways. asserted
loss → threaten → bridges
Americans saw the scale of that risk in Baltimore in 2024, when the 984-foot Singapore-flagged containership Dali lost electrical power, propulsion, and steering and struck the Francis Scott Key Bridge. asserted
containership → see → Bridge
Six highway workers died, and the bridge collapsed. asserted
bridge → die → ?
The National Transportation Safety Board eventually determined that a loose electrical connection caused the blackout. asserted
connection → determine → blackout
But the disaster demonstrated what happens when a massive vessel loses control in a strategically important American harbor. asserted
vessel → demonstrate → harbor
That is one reason the Jones Act deserves to be understood as more than a century-old shipping regulation. asserted
Act → deserve → regulation
The law requires vessels carrying merchandise between two U.S. points to be U.S.-built, U.S.-owned, and coastwise-qualified, with U.S.-citizen crewing requirements. asserted
vessels → require → requirements
It does not prohibit foreign ships from entering American ports. asserted
It → prohibit → ports
Foreign-flag vessels conduct enormous amounts of international trade with the United States every day, but they cannot make multiple stops at U.S. ports and sail up our inland waterways. asserted
they → conduct → waterways
The Jones Act reserves domestic point-to-point maritime commerce for American vessels, operators, and crews. asserted
Act → reserve → vessels
That distinction has important national-security consequences. asserted
distinction → have → consequences
The Army Corps of Engineers maintains roughly 25,000 miles of navigable channels across the country, including approximately 12,000 miles of commercially active inland and intracoastal waterway system. asserted
Corps → maintain → system
These waterways reach deeply into the American heartland, connecting ports, agricultural regions, energy facilities, manufacturing centers, and major metropolitan areas. asserted
waterways → reach → ports
Domestic vessels move through areas containing bridges, pipelines, petroleum facilities, chemical plants, and other critical infrastructure. But there is a meaningful security difference between permitting foreign vessels to deliver international commerce to American ports and turning routine domestic commerce between American points over to foreign-flagged vessels whose ownership structures, employment systems, and flag-state oversight may be based abroad. uncertain
structures → move → vessels
Domestic commerce under the Jones Act keeps that activity within a U.S.-flagged maritime system and sustains an American maritime workforce. asserted
commerce → keep → workforce
That deserves consideration as a homeland security benefit. asserted
That → deserve → benefit
The larger national security argument concerns something America cannot recreate overnight during a war: shipyards, maritime suppliers, skilled tradespeople, and merchant mariners. asserted
America → concern → war
Congressional Research Service analysis describes the national-security goals behind the Jones Act as maintaining three things: a U.S.-controlled commercial fleet that can supplement military sealift, an American merchant-mariner workforce capable of crewing reserve military vessels, and domestic shipbuilding and repair capacity. asserted
that → describe → vessels
That matters because maritime capability is not simply a collection of ships. asserted
capability → matter → ships
When those capabilities disappear, Congress cannot recreate them by passing an emergency appropriation after a war begins. asserted
war → disappear → appropriation
The U.S. already faces serious maritime capacity challenges. asserted
U.S. → face → challenges
CRS reported that the oceangoing Jones Act fleet declined from 181 ships in 2000 to approximately 93, while several specialized vessel categories are absent altogether from the U.S.-built commercial fleet. asserted
categories → report → fleet
That should make the issue more — not less — important. asserted
issue → make → ?
The Maritime Administration explicitly identifies domestic shipping laws such as the Jones Act as part of the country’s national-security maritime system. asserted
Administration → identify → system
MARAD also maintains the Ready Reserve Force and other programs designed to ensure that commercial maritime capabilities can support the War Department during war or national emergencies. asserted
capabilities → maintain → war
A nation that cannot build, repair, maintain, and crew ships is strategically dependent on nations that can. asserted
that → build → nations
And in a world in which China has become a dominant global shipbuilder, dependence on overseas maritime capacity is no longer merely an economic question. asserted
dependence → become → capacity
The trucking comparison is worth considering Duffy’s Transportation Department recently finalized tighter rules governing non-domiciled commercial licenses. asserted
Department → consider → licenses
DOT says the changes are intended to verify immigration and employment status more reliably and ensure the fitness of drivers operating commercial vehicles on American roads. asserted
changes → say → roads
The underlying principle is straightforward: The government has a legitimate interest in knowing who is operating enormous commercial machinery inside the U.S. and whether that person is properly qualified and accountable. asserted
person → underlie → U.S.
That principle does not suddenly become irrelevant when the vehicle floats. asserted
vehicle → become → ?
A tractor-trailer accident can close an interstate. asserted
accident → close → interstate
A major marine casualty can close a port. asserted
casualty → close → port
A truck can damage a bridge. asserted
truck → damage → bridge
A vessel weighing tens of thousands of tons can destroy one. asserted
vessel → weigh → one
A highway accident may spill hundreds of gallons of fuel or hazardous cargo. uncertain
accident → spill → fuel
…and 8 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support