Photo via New York Post

The mystery of Princess Diana’s death lives on, nearly 30 years later

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Adams, C. (2026, September 27). The mystery of Princess Diana’s death lives on, nearly 30 years later. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/09/27/opinion/new-princess-di-book-revisits-secrets-of-her-tragic-death/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-09-27 · by Cindy Adams

Quick Summary

Charles Spencer, Diana's brother and author of "Swan Song: Diana, My Sister," provides new insights into Princess Diana's relationship with Prince Charles and the royal family in the lead-up to her death 30 years ago. The book reveals that Charles was jealous of Diana's popularity and Buckingham Palace was unsupportive of her. However, Spencer does not delve into the specifics of how Diana died, which remains a mystery despite public interest. The article contrasts this with modern media coverage, suggesting that today’s round-the-clock news cycle would likely have uncovered more details about such a high-profile event.
Written by AI on 2026-09-27, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On September 28, 2026, King Charles III and Prince William became furious after Charles Spencer, Princess Diana's brother, released his new book "Swan Song: Diana, My Sister," which includes explosive claims about the royal family. Spencer alleged that then-Prince Charles sounded "giddily elated" upon hearing of Diana’s death in 1997 and threatened to forget her soon enough. This reopened old wounds within the royal family and led to frustration and anger among royal experts, with Kinsey Schofield stating there is genuine anger at what amounts to an attack on King Charles' character almost three decades later. Prince William feels a sense of betrayal from his uncle’s actions as it involves reopening traumatic events from his childhood while damaging allegations are made about his father.

Written for “Charles William Furious Over Book Claims” on 2026-10-30, grounded in this article and the 3 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Charles William Furious Over Book Claims
Politics · 4 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 11% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Sydney Morning Herald
Hedges 4 of 27 claims Outlet record 61/100
“The articles discuss different aspects related to Princess Diana and Earl Spencer's book but do not describe the same specific incident.”
CBC News
Hedges 8 of 35 claims Outlet record 74/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Princess Diana's legacy and her brother's book but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
Fox News
Hedges 8 of 30 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Princess Diana's life and legacy as revealed in her brother's memoir but do not describe the same specific incident.”
Times of India
Hedges 10 of 55 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Princess Diana's life and legacy rather than a single specific incident.”
CBC News
Hedges 5 of 65 claims Outlet record 74/100
“Article A discusses the content and impact of a book about Princess Diana, while Article B focuses on an interview with her brother regarding the intention behind writing the book.”
Daily Mail
Hedges 6 of 40 claims Outlet record 68/100
“Article A discusses a book about Princess Diana, while Article B reports on Prince William and Kate's decision not to publicly comment on Earl Spencer's book.”
ABC News (AU)
Hedges 9 of 84 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss related topics concerning Princess Diana but describe different aspects and occurrences - one focuses on Earl Spencer's analysis of his eulogy, while the other covers claims from his new memoir about her death.”
New York Post
Hedges 0 of 22 claims Outlet record 66/100
“While both articles discuss Princess Diana's death and related family dynamics, they describe different aspects of ongoing events rather than a single specific incident.”
Evening Standard
Hedges 0 of 12 claims Outlet record 65/100
“Article A discusses the content and quotes from Earl Spencer's book about Princess Diana, while Article B focuses on Earl Spencer's interview where he claims to have shared a quote from the book with Barbara Walters in 1997.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
36
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
11%
4 of 36 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
4
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-27 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 15208 article(s) · 35 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 35 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Cindy Adams
14 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 If another country releases evidence first, Washington should explain why Americans may learn about it from some crappy sunken island!
🔮 My own driver knows the place automatically so he could take us to this restaurant blindfolded.
🔮 They would buy out smaller doctors with the least financial futures and tiniest practices and located in the lesser communities.
🔮 With today’s fiscal restraints and wormy little tax-happy mayor, problems with many desperate to earn a living and people moving out of this city, for any tiny brick-and-mortar store to do well is a marvel.
🔮 Nobody could do that now.
🔮 News anchor’s walking on air Fox TV’s Dana Perino might be Fox’s best-looking anchor.
🔮 Opening his political circle is a tactic that is failing Mayor Zohran Mamdani Seems a hole in Crapdammy’s tight — now loosening — circle.
🔮 Yeah, we know would be nice if your pesty neighbor could move.
🔮 Zoos would term them animal trainers.
🔮 Five generations ago, my great-great-grandfather would take his horse and buggy into town.
2026-10-05 · assertive framing · Getting to the core of the Big Apple
Also by Cindy Adams
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 14 articles by Cindy Adams →

Topics

Biarritz Eton France Guam Penguin Press

Subjects

Spencer PERSON · 3× Diana PERSON · 2× Guggenheim ORG · 2× New York GPE · 2× Picasso PERSON · 2× Charles Spencer PERSON · 1× Eton PERSON · 1× Guam GPE · 1× Penguin Press ORG · 1× Princess Diana PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Split the baby in a Solomonic solution: Guggenheim takes the woman, the Handlers get the armchair, I get a grainy photo on my crappy phone and Donald sells the specs to Iran.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-27
🔮 Chapter 22’s “A Permanent Quest to Bring Her Down” states, “I used to fear that a terrible accident could take place.”
2026-09-27 · New York Post
The mystery of Princess Diana’s death lives on, nearly 30 years later · assertive framing

Claims (36 extracted, 4 hedged)

Author: Eton-educated journalist Charles Spencer, a k a 9th Earl Spencer, whom I know and who lost his adored sister Princess Diana in August 1997. asserted
who → educate → August
A copy was delivered to me before he crossed the ocean to meet every US reporter this side of Guam. asserted
he → deliver → Guam
It explains her future king husband hissed, and here’s his Page 121 quote, “We’ll forget her soon enough.” asserted
We → explain → her
Page 128: “Diana was made to feel as if she was stupid.” asserted
she → make → ?
Chapter 22’s “A Permanent Quest to Bring Her Down” states, “I used to fear that a terrible accident could take place.” uncertain
accident → bring → place
Spencer’s quote: “I always believed she’d be killed in the end. asserted
she → believe → end
Buckingham Palace did not favor her. asserted
Palace → favor → her
And her husband was “extremely jealous of Diana’s star power,” Spencer writes. asserted
Spencer → write → power
As for the night it happened, its how/what/why/who is never reported on. asserted
who → happen → night
Only how “the Queen looked smart and composed in a black dress for the funeral.” asserted
Queen → look → funeral
Only how “the Queen was seen in the streets outside the royal palaces thanking people for their kind condolences.” asserted
Queen → see → condolences
A wacko zaps a homeless person in a subway? asserted
wacko → zap → subway
Chat shows nobody’s heard of discussing the story. asserted
nobody → show → story
Princess Di gone? asserted
Di → go → ?
Social media and AI will tell every detail. asserted
media → tell → detail
And nobody knows nothing? asserted
nobody → know → nothing
Would seem somebody knows something. asserted
somebody → seem → something
But nobody says anything. asserted
nobody → say → anything
We have podcasts, radio, newspapers, marchers schlepping placards, airplane skywriters, supermarket ads, devotees, chewing gum wrappers, T-shirts — and not one single body reporting what might appear to have happened? uncertain
what → have → placards
His Majesty the King — with infirmities and how the book treats him, and how the world views the rest of his family — is not sending copies of this for the holidays. asserted
world → treat → holidays
Still, a lifetime later, nobody dares suggest knowing anything about that August night. asserted
nobody → suggest → night
Maybe someday somebody will know and somebody will tell. asserted
somebody → know → ?
I have stuff to tell you: 1918 in Biarritz, France. asserted
I → have → Biarritz
It’s where he painted “Woman in an Armchair.” asserted
he → ’ → Armchair
Understand, we are not talking cockamamie Crayolas here. asserted
we → understand → Crayolas
Solomon Guggenheim acquired the canvas for his foundation. asserted
Guggenheim → acquire → foundation
In 1960 it was lent to the University of Pittsburgh. asserted
it → lend → Pittsburgh
Suddenly this masterpiece disappeared — stolen from the student union. asserted
masterpiece → disappear → union
Chubb Insurance paid $7,000 for the loss. asserted
Insurance → pay → loss
The plot thickens. asserted
plot → thicken → ?
This painting recently popped up at Christie’s. asserted
painting → pop → Christie
How, I don’t know. asserted
I → know → ?
But now a crate of Guggenheim lawyers is suing Lawrence Jay and Wendy Cohen Handler, who claim they bought the stolen Picasso in ’99 from Fifth Avenue’s Beadleston Gallery. uncertain
they → sue → Gallery
They want it back. asserted
They → want → it
Split the baby in a Solomonic solution: Guggenheim takes the woman, the Handlers get the armchair, I get a grainy photo on my crappy phone and Donald sells the specs to Iran. asserted
Donald → split → Iran
The thing could end up as a Crayola on 14th Street. uncertain
thing → end → Street
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support