Photo via Daily Mail

Labour shambles over Heathrow third runway as Treasury ministers pledge support for airport's expansion - despite Burnham failing to back project

Read the original at Daily Mail ↗
Cite

Heffer, G. (2026, September 28). Labour shambles over Heathrow third runway as Treasury ministers pledge support for airport's expansion - despite Burnham failing to back project. Daily Mail. https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16165961/Labour-shambles-Heathrow-runway-Treasury-ministers-pledge-support-airports-expansion-despite-Burnham-failing-project.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Daily Mail · collected 2026-09-28 · by Greg Heffer

Quick Summary

Labour faces internal confusion over supporting Heathrow’s third runway expansion, with Treasury ministers James Murray and Dan Tomlinson backing the project despite Andy Burnham’s hesitation. Murray emphasized that expanding Britain’s busiest airport is crucial for job creation and economic investment across the country, contradicting Burnham's suggestion that it should be a decision left to London. This stance highlights disagreements within Labour as they navigate public opinion and economic benefits tied to Heathrow's expansion.
Written by AI on 2026-09-28, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Andy Burnham, the UK Prime Minister, has declined to support plans for a third runway at Heathrow Airport, citing the need to consider local opinions first. The project, which was initially set to be completed by 2035, is now expected to open in 2039 due to delays and regulatory challenges. Burnham's stance contrasts with his predecessor Keir Starmer’s support for the expansion, which is projected to create at least 108,000 jobs but faces significant opposition from environmental groups and communities concerned about pollution and climate impacts. Despite these challenges, Heathrow aims to secure planning permission by 2029, after which construction could take a decade. Burnham's reluctance to endorse the project further casts doubt on its future as it faces ongoing debates in Parliament and scrutiny over compliance with UK’s legally binding climate targets.

Written for “Heathrow Third Runway Delay” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 14 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Heathrow Third Runway Delay
Politics · 15 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans right and hedges 15% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
BBC News
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 3 of 20 claims Outlet record 68/100
Evening Standard
Hedges 3 of 23 claims Outlet record 65/100
Evening Standard
Hedges 2 of 18 claims Outlet record 65/100
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 2 of 16 claims Outlet record 68/100
“While both articles discuss opposition to Heathrow airport expansion, they describe different meetings and statements made by different government officials at distinct times.”
Evening Standard
Hedges 2 of 9 claims Outlet record 65/100
“While both articles discuss Andy Burnham's stance on a third runway at Heathrow, Article A describes his refusal to back the project during an interview, while Article B focuses on Labour's confusion and Treasury ministers supporting it despite Burnham's lack of endorsement, indicating different aspects or later developments.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 1 of 11 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The first article reports on Burnham's refusal to back the third runway project, while the second describes Treasury ministers supporting the expansion despite Burnham's stance, indicating a different but related development.”
The Guardian
Hedges 4 of 33 claims Outlet record 66/100
“While both articles discuss similar issues around Labour's stance and delays for the Heathrow third runway, they describe different aspects of the ongoing situation rather than a single specific incident.”
Evening Standard
Hedges 2 of 11 claims Outlet record 65/100
“The articles report on different aspects of the Heathrow third runway project, with Article A focusing on the delay announcement and economic impact, while Article B focuses on Treasury ministers supporting the expansion despite confusion within Labour.”
Evening Standard
Hedges 0 of 22 claims Outlet record 65/100
“While both articles discuss Andy Burnham's reluctance to support a third runway at Heathrow, Article A focuses on his multiple refusals in an interview, while Article B discusses the broader confusion and conflicting statements from Labour and Treasury ministers.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this Hedges 6 of 62 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the Heathrow third runway project, with Article A focusing on delays and opposition, while Article B covers political confusion within Labour over support for the expansion.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
27
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
15%
4 of 27 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
68/100
Daily Mail's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
15
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-28 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Daily Mail · 8535 article(s) · 20 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 20 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Greg Heffer
68 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Andy Burnham today ruled out calling a snap general election in the next 12 months - despite the Budget fuelling speculation he could soon go to the polls.
🔮 But I could see, given that my prayer card had been removed, I was heading towards another physical altercation.
🔮 Prior to Wednesday's Budget, a survey by the motoring group found one in three drivers (34 per cent) would prefer the Chancellor cut VAT on fuel over reducing fuel duty.
🔮 But he insisted Labour's 'red lines' on Brexit - which include no return to the single market, customs union or free movement - would remain in place until the next general election.
🔮 Sorry John... but it's important to be direct.' However, despite the warning from Mr Zelensky, the Chancellor is not expected to set out how he will meet a NATO defence spending target on Wednesday.
🔮 Angela Rayner suggested that Labour could even take Britain back into the EU's single market without holding a referendum.
🔮 But leaving people languishing on benefits when they could be working isn’t compassion.
🔮 The Defence Secretary cautioned that the UK's enemies could be 'in a position to attack' by 2030 as he urged the country to 'prepare for the worst'.
🔮 Angela Rayner today signalled that Shabana Mahmood will weaken Labour's proposed immigration crackdown after she led a revolt against 'un-British' reforms.
🔮 There is likely to be an even bigger row within Labour's ranks if Rosebank is approved, as the oil field is predicted to produce many more tons of carbon emissions – if it is also given the go-ahead – than Jackdaw.
Also by Greg Heffer
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 68 articles by Greg Heffer →

Topics

Daily Mail Labour London Londoners Treasury

Subjects

London GPE · 7× Labour ORG · 6× Treasury ORG · 5× Burnham PERSON · 3× Londoners NORP · 3× Andy Burnham PERSON · 2× James Murray PERSON · 2× Murray PERSON · 2× Britain GPE · 1× Daily Mail ORG · 1×

Narrative

Labour's position on Heathrow's third runway was mired in confusion today after Treasury ministers backed the project - despite Andy Burnham failing to support it James Murray, the Financial Secretary to the Treasury, said the expansion of Heathrow was 'really important' for the country's future '
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-28
🔮 Asked why the PM could not give his full backing to the project, Mr Murray said: 'Well, he was saying that it's important to listen to what Londoners have to say and there's been a consultation.

Claims (27 extracted, 4 hedged)

- See more Daily Mail on Google - save us as a Preferred Source Labour's position on Heathrow's third runway was mired in confusion today after Treasury ministers backed the project - despite Andy Burnham failing to support it. asserted
Burnham → see → it
James Murray, the Financial Secretary to the Treasury, said the expansion of Britain's busiest airport was 'really important' for the country's future. asserted
expansion → say → future
His Treasury colleague Dan Tomlinson, the growth minister, also pledged his support for the proposal. asserted
colleague → pledge → proposal
They both spoke after the Prime Minister cast huge doubt over Heathrow's expansion by repeatedly refusing to endorse the scheme. asserted
Minister → speak → scheme
In a TV interview on Sunday at the start of Labour's conference in Liverpool, Mr Burnham suggested it was a matter 'for London' and that the Government was waiting for the outcome of a consultation. uncertain
Government → suggest → consultation
The ambivalent stance came despite Chancellor John Healey telling the House of Commons earlier this month that the Government supports the project. asserted
Government → come → project
The PM's equivocation sparked a sharp response from Labour's trade union allies, who pointed out Heathrow's expansion should create 100,000 jobs. asserted
expansion → spark → jobs
Mr Murray, whose Ealing North seat is in west London, contradicted Mr Burnham on Monday by saying it was not just an issue for the capital. asserted
it → contradict → capital
Labour's position on Heathrow's third runway was mired in confusion today after Treasury ministers backed the project - despite Andy Burnham failing to support it James Murray, the Financial Secretary to the Treasury, said the expansion of Heathrow was 'really important' for the country's future ' asserted
expansion → mire → future
What the PM set out yesterday was that it's important to listen to Londoners and I know that – I'm a London MP and if I listen to my constituents, you know there are different views on it,' he told the Press Association. asserted
he → set → Association
'But I think we recognise that having that third runway is really important for jobs, it's really important to get that investment into Heathrow and it's actually really important for the whole country. asserted
it → think → country
'Because that investment in making Heathrow stronger, making our country stronger, making sure that we boost trade and making sure we get more jobs right across the country is really important for our future.' asserted
get → make → future
Asked why the PM could not give his full backing to the project, Mr Murray said: 'Well, he was saying that it's important to listen to what Londoners have to say and there's been a consultation. uncertain
Londoners → ask → what
The Government's now looking at the consultation responses and will set out its response shortly.' asserted
Government → look → response
He added: 'I think Heathrow has a really important role to play and as an MP in west London, I know how important it is for jobs and my constituents. asserted
it → add → jobs
It's for the whole country and it's really important to have investment in aviation right across the country. asserted
it → have → country
Mr Tomlinson also pledged his support for Heathrow's third runway, telling a LabourList fringe meeting on Sunday: 'As growth minister, I think you might be all wondering what my view is on Heathrow, and I want to tell you that as a London MP who lives under the flight path, that I am very pro Heathrow expansion.' uncertain
I → pledge → expansion
Labour's support for Heathrow's third runway was set out by former chancellor Rachel Reeves in January last year. asserted
support → set → January
Estimated to cost £33billion, including £1.5billion to move the M25 to build the runway, the scheme is expected to be fully privately financed. asserted
scheme → estimate → runway
It would see Heathrow's capacity increase to 756,000 flights and 150 million passengers per year. asserted
It → see → year
But Mr Burnham was unwilling to confirm that he was in favour of the project going ahead in a major interview at the start of Labour's conference. ' asserted
project → confirm → conference
Principally, it's a matter for London and Londoners,' he told the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg when asked if he would back the move. asserted
he → tell → move
He diverted questions about his views, saying he would wait to hear the outcome of a consultation process on the matter. asserted
he → divert → matter
'It's not right for me to just jump straight in on the back of the consultation,' he said. asserted
he → jump → consultation
He later added: 'I think it's right that we hear what people have said through the consultation, and then consider the way forward from there.' asserted
people → add → way
Ms Reeves had suggested the runway could be open in 2035 but airport bosses have told ministers that timetable appears impossible to meet. uncertain
timetable → suggest → ministers
The airport aims to get planning permission by 2029, and from that point believes building the new runway within a decade to be a reasonable goal. asserted
building → aim → decade
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support