Photo via Washington Examiner

Justice Alito recuses himself from major Supreme Court climate change case

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Birle, J. (2026, September 28). Justice Alito recuses himself from major Supreme Court climate change case. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/supreme-court/4745497/justice-alito-recuses-supreme-court-climate-change-case/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-09-28 · by Jack Birle

Quick Summary

Justice Samuel Alito announced his recusal from the Suncor Energy v. County Commissioners of Boulder County case just a week before oral arguments were set to begin, following pressure from left-wing groups. This leaves the possibility for a 4-4 deadlock if another justice also recuses themselves or abstains, which would uphold the lower court’s decision without setting new precedent. Alito previously recused himself last term in a similar case due to financial interests in ConocoPhillips. The upcoming arguments will determine whether lawsuits against oil companies for their role in climate change can proceed.
Written by AI on 2026-09-28, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Justice Samuel Alito recused himself from Suncor Energy v. Boulder County, a major climate change case set to be heard by the Supreme Court on October 5th. The case involves state efforts to sue fossil fuel companies over alleged contributions to global warming, and Alito's decision comes after facing pressure from environmental groups due to his stock holdings in oil companies. In a letter posted to the court’s docket, the Clerk of the Supreme Court stated that Justice Alito "has determined that he will not continue to participate in this case." This recusal could leave the case with only eight justices, potentially leading to a 4-4 deadlock, which would uphold the lower court's ruling. The decision is seen as significant given Alito’s history of dissenting in preemption cases and his conservative judicial stance.

Written for “Alito Recuses In Climate Case” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 8 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Alito Recuses In Climate Case
Politics · 9 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans right and hedges 21% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Guardian
Hedges 2 of 12 claims Outlet record 66/100
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 3 of 14 claims Outlet record 68/100
Reason
Hedges 4 of 13 claims Outlet record 67/100
Fox News
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 7 of 36 claims Outlet record 69/100
ABC News (US)
Hedges 2 of 13 claims Outlet record 70/100
Reason
Hedges 2 of 10 claims Outlet record 67/100
Toronto Star
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 64/100
Mother Jones
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 5 of 49 claims Outlet record 95/100
Reason
Hedges 18 of 87 claims Outlet record 67/100
“While both articles mention the Suncor Energy v. Boulder County case, Article A describes Justice Alito's recusal from the case a week before oral arguments, while Article B discusses an amicus brief and anticipation for the upcoming oral arguments.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 12 of 56 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss related events but different aspects: Article A covers Justice Alito's recusal from a case, while Article B discusses upcoming arguments and the broader implications of the case.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
14
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
21%
3 of 14 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
70/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
9
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-28 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 3851 article(s) · 7 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 7 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Jack Birle
34 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 As same-day voters go to the polls for the midterm elections next week, the Supreme Court will hear a major religious liberty case over a Colorado universal preschool program with implications beyond the Centennial State.
🔮 A trio of cases involving property rights and personal freedoms set to be argued this term illustrates the role of the Supreme Court as the last line of defense for people fighting what they see as government overreach.
🔮 The Supreme Court will hear a pair of cases over the legality of sweeping “assault weapons” bans later this year, and the local governments at the center of the lawsuits are urging the high court this week to let them ban the firearms they claim are responsible for the “most tragic and frightening crimes.”
🔮 The Supreme Court handed the Trump administration a loss on its emergency docket on Wednesday, declining to lift a lower court’s block on a new regulation for federal prisons that would stop providing inmates with transgender surgeries and procedures.
🔮 The high court announced in an order list that because they lacked a quorum in BMG Rights Management v. Vetter, the lower court’s ruling would be affirmed as if the justices never took up the case, the same way that a deadlock at the Supreme Court would affirm a lower court’s ruling.
🔮 The Supreme Court announced Monday that it will hear a challenge to a federal law barring the distilling of alcohol at home, weighing whether it oversteps the federal government’s powers.
🔮 Justice Samuel Alito began his 22nd Supreme Court term last week, but even as he insists he will remain on the bench, speculation has grown over whether it could be his final one on the high court.
🔮 The high court ruled 7-2 to halt a ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit that would have forced the FCC to issue a final ruling on a revised rule allowing political parties and joint fundraising committees to access the same, more favorable television advertisement rates that are typically reserved for political candidates.
🔮 A lower federal court had ordered discovery into whether DOGE is subject to FOIA, but the Trump administration has argued the “sweeping, intrusive discovery” would effectively give the watchdog the documents it wants through the request before the court could even determine if it is subject to the public records request.
🔮 A female high school wrestler in Washington urged the Supreme Court earlier this week to intervene in a lawsuit over the state’s laws allowing biological men to compete in women’s sports, as the high court could issue another key ruling about transgender sports policies months after its landmark June decision.
Also by Jack Birle
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 34 articles by Jack Birle →

Topics

Chevron ConocoPhillips Suncor Supreme Court the Supreme Court

Subjects

Alito PERSON · 6× the Supreme Court ORG · 5× Suncor ORG · 3× Chevron ORG · 2× ConocoPhillips ORG · 2× Suncor Energy ORG · 2× George W. Bush PERSON · 1× Samuel Alito PERSON · 1× Scott Harris PERSON · 1× Supreme Court ORG · 1×

Narrative

Alito, who has served on the Supreme Court since 2006 after being appointed by then-President George W. Bush, did not offer an explanation for his recusal, with the Clerk of the Supreme Court Scott Harris saying in a letter posted to the high court’s docket that the justice “has determined that he will not continue to participate in this case.”
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-28
🔮 Justice Samuel Alito announced Monday he would be recusing himself from a major Supreme Court climate change case a week before oral arguments, after facing pressure from left-wing groups to do so.
2026-09-28 · Washington Examiner
Justice Alito recuses himself from major Supreme Court climate change case · mixed framing

Claims (14 extracted, 3 hedged)

Justice Samuel Alito announced Monday he would be recusing himself from a major Supreme Court climate change case a week before oral arguments, after facing pressure from left-wing groups to do so. asserted
he → announce → groups
Alito, who has served on the Supreme Court since 2006 after being appointed by then-President George W. Bush, did not offer an explanation for his recusal, with the Clerk of the Supreme Court Scott Harris saying in a letter posted to the high court’s docket that the justice “has determined that he will not continue to participate in this case.” asserted
he → serve → case
The upcoming arguments in Suncor Energy v. County Commissioners of Boulder County will see the justices decide whether a lawsuit brought by Boulder County, Colorado, seeking to hold oil companies accountable for their alleged role in global climate change, may move forward, with major ramifications for similar lawsuits that climate activists and Democratic-led jurisdictions have attempted to bring against oil companies. uncertain
activists → see → companies
Alito’s recusal means oral arguments next Monday will include only the other eight justices, leaving open the possibility of a 4-4 deadlock. asserted
arguments → mean → deadlock
If the high court comes to a 4-4 split, the lower court’s ruling would remain in place, and it would be as if the Supreme Court never took up the case for oral arguments, a scenario which occurred in May 2025 when Justice Amy Coney Barrett recused herself from a case over a Catholic charter school seeking admission into the Oklahoma charter school system. uncertain
Barrett → come → system
Alito previously recused himself from another climate change lawsuit last term, citing his financial interest in ConocoPhillips, the parent corporation for Burlington Resources Oil and Gas Company, which remained a party to the case Chevron USA v. Plaquemines Parish. asserted
which → recuse → Parish
Similar to his recusal announcement on Monday, Alito announced his recusal from the Chevron case days before oral arguments. asserted
Alito → announce → arguments
Alito explained that, at the time, he was informed that ConocoPhillips had fully withdrawn from the case, but later learned the company was still part of the lawsuit in the lower court, so he elected to recuse himself. asserted
he → explain → himself
In the Chevron case, the Supreme Court later ruled 8-0 in favor of the oil companies’ bid to move a lawsuit seeking damages for coastline damage caused by oil production in Louisiana from state court to federal court. asserted
Court → rule → court
Left-wing legal groups had pointed to Alito’s past rationale as a reason for him to recuse himself from the Suncor case, something he had resisted doing until Monday. asserted
he → point → Monday
Justice Elena Kagan has similarly received pressure from right-wing legal groups to recuse herself from the Suncor case after she wrote the forward to the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, which included a chapter on climate science that critics claim addresses issues in dispute in the upcoming case. uncertain
critics → receive → case
Kagan has declined to recuse herself, telling senators during a hearing over the summer she did not review that section of the manual and did not reference climate science in her foreword. asserted
she → decline → foreword
The Supreme Court will open its upcoming term next Monday with oral arguments in the Suncor Energy case, with oral arguments in a variety of cases continuing through the end of April 2027. asserted
arguments → open → April
The high court is expected to issue rulings in all cases, including the Suncor case, by the end of June 2027. asserted
court → expect → June
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support